Dialing up to reregulation - FCC and Radio

R

RadioPatrol

Guest
:coffee:



Dialing up to reregulation

By James C. Miller III
May 13, 2008

The rationale for the original content regulations (imposed over several decades) is that radio broadcasters tend to lose touch with the local populations they were intended to serve under their "public service obligation." The theory (never really proven) is that, since they typically faced little competition from other broadcasters, they would respond only to narrow commercial interests, not the public as a whole. This led to quotas for certain types of government-preferred, non-entertainment programming.

The same reasoning led to the so-called Fairness Doctrine, which throttled real debate and almost strangled talk radio in its infancy. The result was that broadcasters not only had to fill out a lot of paperwork no one ever read, but the public was saddled with messages and formats they really didn"t want.

:doh:

According to the FCC's press release of last December, radio stations would have to "establish permanent advisory boards ... with which to consult periodically on community needs and issues." Also, ominously, the commission would adopt license renewal procedures to "ensure that all broadcasters provide some locally-oriented programming." And who determines what qualifies as acceptable locally produced programming? Why, the FCC of course!

:jameo:

Imagine, for a moment, the outrage that would ensue if some federal agency were established to assure that publications were "responsive to the needs and issues" (FCC language) of their customers. Or, think of a federal agency to decide the kinds of foods Safeway, Kroger and Wal-Mart, as well as the local grocer, must carry and the space devoted to each type. Or a home improvement czar to tell Home Depot, Lowe's and the local Ace Hardware just what building materials to carry and how they should be displayed. Think this would really help consumers?

:faint:

It all sounds very Socialistic .....

:whistle:
 
Top