Drinking Coffee While Black

[GURPS]

You sound like one of those people who tells handicapped people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps despite them not having legs.

you obviously do not understand SELF HELP and Metaphors

 

[Sapidus]

So you waffle based on the scenario? Can't you make a concrete decision on the matter?

My opinion is that they are NOT responsible no matter what the scenario.

Apt name Middleground to turn around and call someone finding Middle ground a waffler.

More reason to assume you are not bright

 

[Toxick]

Well, you're certainly exercising this to the Nth degree by assuming the actions taken against these two black... errrr... 'people of color' was rooted in racism.

...He said cropping out all supporting context.






Anyway, I am assuming nothing.




I have implied (not even stated outright, until now) that it appears to be the case.
And I have also asserted that selective enforcement of a "No Loitering" policy - when that selection is decidedly based on racial profiles - is definitely racism.

 

[PsyOps]

...He said cropping out all supporting context.






Anyway, I am assuming nothing.




I have implied (not even stated outright, until now) that it appears to be the case.
And I have also asserted that selective enforcement of a "No Loitering" policy - when that selection is decidedly based on racial profiles - is definitely racism.

Assume - Implied

Tomato - Tomahto :shrug:

 

[Gilligan]

You sound like one of those people who tells handicapped people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps despite them not having legs.

So you think black people are handicapped. Sounds pretty racist to me.

 

[Toxick]

Assume - Implied

The #### kinda dictionary are you reading?

 

[Sapidus]

So you think black people are handicapped. Sounds pretty racist to me.

HAHAH

What a moron.

Trying to teach someone the difference between assuming and implying and then ASSUMING i was comparing blacks to handicapped people.

You really can't make this stuff up folks.

Gillian will be performing his amazing acts of stupidity all week

 

[MiddleGround]

Apt name Middleground to turn around and call someone finding Middle ground a waffler.

More reason to assume you are not bright

How do you equate indecision with "finding middle ground?" Are you in politics?

"It depends" means you are not willing to make a firm decision. Which equals indecision. So, now who is not very bright?

By the way... the question is still out there. Do you believe that gun manufacturers should be blamed at all for the recent gun violence?

 

[Sapidus]

How do you equate indecision with "finding middle ground?" Are you in politics?

"It depends" means you are not willing to make a firm decision. Which equals indecision. So, now who is not very bright?

By the way... the question is still out there. Do you believe that gun manufacturers should be blamed at all for the recent gun violence?

In some situations yes and others no.

If the manufacturer was negligent by selling to someone who shouldn't have a gun legally then yes.

Is that so difficult for you to understand?

 

[Toxick]

In some situations yes and others no.

If the manufacturer was negligent by selling to someone who shouldn't have a gun legally then yes.

Is that so difficult for you to understand?

It's pretty hard for me to understand.



Since manufacturers aren't the ones selling them to people.

 

[black dog]

My observation is that the damaging effects of white privilege on the black community are inconsequential when compared to the damaging effects of black entitlement on the black community.

Some of you thin skinned white apologists may understand this better by going into the black community and asking them to explain the meaning of, "Ain't no use being a n_gga if you ain't gonna act like one"

Oh, and the Starbucks thingy? Set-up all the way.

Most of the thin skinned supposed white folks have never spent any quality time in a black neighborhood. Much less the slums or getto.

 

[black dog]

You sound like one of those people who tells handicapped people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps despite them not having legs.

Interesting that you post that,
The greeter at my nearest Walmart sits in a battery chair because his legs don't work and his infant like arms are all twisted up.
But you know what, when I walk in he always has a joke and a fist bump with that twisted up little arm along with a great attitude.
And he gets his black handicapped a$$ out of bed each day and takes public transportation to get back and forth to work.
If his arms worked better I would hire him at twice his pay and let the tattooed chic teach him how to tig weld. What a motivation he would be, hey Billy no legs produced 30% more than the rest of you again this week again.. But his arms don't work..
But that's my White Privilege talking again..

 

[black dog]

In some situations yes and others no.

If the manufacturer was negligent by selling to someone who shouldn't have a gun legally then yes.

Is that so difficult for you to understand?

That's not how it works.....
Why is it so difficult for you to understand that the manufacturer does not sell directly to the customer / consumer.

The lefts severe lack of knowledge on so many topics they try to dominate is hysterical, and really sad.. but you keep trying to see if something sticks.
.

 

[vraiblonde]

You sound like one of those people who tells handicapped people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps despite them not having legs.

Did you really just say black people are handicapped?

 

[MiddleGround]

If the manufacturer was negligent by selling to someone who shouldn't have a gun legally then yes.

Is that so difficult for you to understand?

So, you think gun manufacturers (and distributors by default) should be held accountable for their actions when they sell to someone who shouldn't legally own BUT, you are perfectly fine with just "forgetting" about the people who actually sold blacks into slavery and submitted them to 300+ years of hardships in the first place. Why? Because it doesn't fit the agenda and defeats the argument.

 

[Sapidus]

Did you really just say black people are handicapped?

remember when you tried to twist my words last time and I taught you the word minority?

It still applies here

 

[Sapidus]

Interesting that you post that,
The greeter at my nearest Walmart sits in a battery chair because his legs don't work and his infant like arms are all twisted up.
But you know what, when I walk in he always has a joke and a fist bump with that twisted up little arm along with a great attitude.
And he gets his black handicapped a$$ out of bed each day and takes public transportation to get back and forth to work.
If his arms worked better I would hire him at twice his pay and let the tattooed chic teach him how to tig weld. What a motivation he would be, hey Billy no legs produced 30% more than the rest of you again this week again.. But his arms don't work..
But that's my White Privilege talking again..

That's awesome.

Good for him.

That is not everyones reality or a possibility for everyone. Some people overcome adversity. Some don't

 

[Sapidus]

It's pretty hard for me to understand.

Since manufacturers aren't the ones selling them to people.

Yes but they sell to the middleman and if they are not responsible about which middle man they could be held responsible.

If they repeatedly sell to a store that has been caught selling to minors or other people not legally allowed to buy a gun

 

[This_person]

You sound like one of those people who tells handicapped people to pull themselves up by the bootstraps despite them not having legs.

Do you assume that there are some people who just can not support themselves - handicapped or not? If so, what would be the cause for those people to not be able to support themselves, and what percent of the total population do you believe those people to be?

 

[This_person]

In some situations yes and others no.

If the manufacturer was negligent by selling to someone who shouldn't have a gun legally then yes.

Is that so difficult for you to understand?

Do you then believe that Ford should be held responsible for accidents involving drunk drivers when the purchaser has a previous DUI?