Ehrlich Unlawfully Picks DSS Head W/O Mayor's Approval

D

DysonFamily

Guest
State Unlawfully Named Interim Chief, Ruling Says; Mayor's Approval Not Obtained; Governments Get 45 Days To Decide In Replacement

By Laura Vozzella
Sun Staff
July 13, 2004

The administration of Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. acted unlawfully when it appointed Floyd R. Blair to lead a city-based social service
agency over the objections of Mayor Martin O'Malley, a Baltimore
Circuit Court judge ruled yesterday.

Judge M. Brooke Murdock granted the city's motion for summary
judgment at the end of an hourlong hearing in which City Solicitor
Ralph S. Tyler described Blair's appointment as "a lawless exercise
of brute force."

Murdock gave the state and city 45 days to agree on someone to
replace Blair at the helm of the long-troubled Baltimore City
Department of Social Services, a primarily state-funded agency that employs 2,600 and serves more than 50,000 children and adults.

She did not remove Blair from his post in the meantime. The city had sought his immediate removal when it filed its lawsuit in November, but it did not ask for that remedy yesterday.

"We're pleased that the court upheld the mayor's argument and found that the state had acted unlawfully," Tyler said.

Assistant Attorney General Steven M. Sullivan, who represented the state in the case, said he was not sure if the state would
appeal. "I have to discuss that with the governor and secretary," he said, referring to Secretary of Human Services Christopher J. McCabe.

The question of who leads DSS is considered important because the department is responsible for the welfare of the city's most
vulnerable children and adults. There have been a number of horrific cases - the fatal beating of month-old twins in May; the starvation death of 15-year-old Ciara Jobes in December 2002 - in which critics have accused the agency of dropping the ball.

But along with human stakes, the appointment battle comes with a political subplot. Ehrlich and O'Malley are bitter political foes.
The Democratic mayor is widely expected to be among the candidates to challenge the Republican governor in 2006.

The political acrimony was hardly snuffed out by the ruling. Ehrlich
issued a statement that noted his right to appeal, praised Blair's
accomplishments, suggested Blair should be considered a candidate for the permanent post and criticized O'Malley as being
uncooperative.

"Today I find myself in the position of again asking the Mayor to
put politics aside and act in the best interests of Baltimore City's
citizens," Ehrlich said.

Letter to McCabe

Steve Kearney, a spokesman for O'Malley, said the mayor's staff sent a letter yesterday to McCabe, saying City Hall was ready to work with him on the search. But in a statement, the mayor also had harsh words for Ehrlich.

"It's a good day for the vulnerable children and adults who rely on
DSS in Baltimore," he said. "Substance and the law have won out over politics. It is a shame that the governor refused our repeated calls to work together, and wasted a year that we didn't have to spare. Now, the court has spoken, and it's time to get an effective leader for this troubled agency."

McCabe appointed Blair in September as interim director against the wishes of O'Malley. In November, O'Malley filed a lawsuit seeking Blair's removal because he lacked five years' management experience and the mayor's approval. Both are required by law.

At the time, Blair contended he was qualified for the job, in part
because of his inspirational life story. A self-described "poor kid
from the projects," Blair became a lawyer who worked for President Bush for 17 months as an associate director of a faith-based social services initiative.

Blair's qualifications were not debated during yesterday's hearing,
which centered on whether McCabe had the legal right to put Blair in the job without O'Malley's consent.

Tyler came to court armed with a poster-sized excerpt from state
law, Article 88A, Section 13(b), which states that the director is
to be appointed "with the concurrence of the Secretary of Human
Resources and ... the Mayor of Baltimore City."

While conceding that the mayor has a say in who directs the
department, Sullivan said the requirement did not apply to Blair
because he was serving in an interim capacity. If the governor's
office was denied the power to appoint a temporary director,
Sullivan argued, a mayor who wanted to stonewall the state could
prevent the agency from functioning.

Tyler said McCabe did not have the authority to appoint a director,
even on an interim basis, without the mayor's consent. He said
McCabe had no intention to replace Blair, who has been in the post 10 months.

Trying for a choice

Sullivan said Ehrlich and McCabe had been trying to come up with a permanent choice who would be acceptable to O'Malley.

"You're not saying politics would interfere with their ability to do
right by the citizens of Baltimore?" Murdock asked.

Sullivan said politics should not play a role, but the selection was
complicated because the officials involved were "diametrically
opposed" to each other.

In her ruling, Murdock noted that McCabe had sought and obtained O'Malley's consent for the appointment of a previous interim director, and that McCabe put Blair in the position after O'Malley had rejected him as a permanent choice. She expressed hope that the Ehrlich administration and O'Malley would "overcome political differences" and agree on someone to take the helm of the "large, complex and troubled organization."

Copyright © 2004, The Baltimore Sun


http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-md.blair13jul13,0,2483446.story?coll=bal-local-headlines
 

Sharon

* * * * * * * * *
Staff member
PREMO Member
Forum Rules

Reminder for News Postings

Please do NOT post articles that contain copyrighted material. Excerpt and link to the article instead. An excerpt consists of one or two paragraphs from the source.

From now on, any copyrighted materials that get posted on here will be removed and the poster temporarily banned. We must take this seriously, as the authors of the works take it VERY seriously and we have no interest in fighting off lawsuits.

Thank you for your cooperation.
 

FromTexas

This Space for Rent
Big deal anyway. Its the politics game. Its no major crime or conspiracy. Mayor will block anything he wants just from being a polar opposite to him. He will try to get what he wants.
 
Top