Election 2024 Debate - Trump / Harris

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
I agree with some on TV last night. KH is looking for ANY excuse not to debate Trump.


Kamala is brain dead or drunk ... with so much world salad saying NOTHING ...

I don't know how she ever made it in a Court Room ....

Trump is going to take her lunch
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

ABC News REJECTS Kamala Harris' INSANE DEMANDS TO RIG Debate After Trump Puts Her In CHECKMATE!​



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
This is why Harris wants ' open ' mics



She wants the sound bite of her telling Trump to STFU


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Hold on - Is Kamala Trying to Change Debate Rules AGAIN, Even As She's Struggling in Debate Prep





But now the debate is quickly approaching on September 10. As we reported, they are now trying to argue that Harris is "fundamentally disadvantaged" by having the mics muted when she's not speaking.

But that's the very point that Joe Biden asked for — former President Donald Trump didn't ask for that. So, once again, right out of the box, the Harris team is being dishonest about that. Harris was also the one insisting on how they had to keep to the rules/date agreed to for a debate with Joe Biden, so it's hilarious she now wants to get out of those rules.

It also sounds like the Harris team is still trying to change the rules. They appear to be butting heads with ABC on what has been agreed to, even as they say there's an agreement. According to what was conveyed to POLITICO, Harris campaign official Brian Fallon claimed there were "verbal agreements" that were important to getting Harris to finally agree to proceed.

Those agreed-to stipulations enable the moderators to admonish any candidate who interrupts and urge them to convey anything said into a muted mic to the broader audience. Additionally, the network will have the ability to keep both microphones open during crosstalk or any heated back-and-forth. And, unlike in the June 27 debate between Trump and President Joe Biden, the small pool of journalists traveling with Harris should be in the debate hall and close enough to the stage to be able to hear any remarks that are muted for the wider television audience.

CNN reported a similar story.

The network, according to the source familiar, has offered assurances to the Harris campaign that if there is significant cross talk between Harris and Trump, it may choose to turn on the mics so that the public can understand what is happening, the moderator would discourage either candidate from interrupting constantly and the moderator would also work to explain to viewers what is being said.
Pool reporters, who can report on what they hear both sides saying, will also be in the room, the source added.


But ABC is saying there are no new rules or stipulations — that they're running with what was agreed to in May. So what's going on here? Has ABC made some off-the-record deal with the Harris team that they stupidly revealed? Or is this the Harris team just being their own typical mess?

Either way, Harris is now in Pennsylvania for her debate camp. Even before then, in strategy sessions, there were problems, as our sister site PJ Media notes, citing NOTUS.

"At times, according to two people familiar with the process, strategy sessions have careened sideways when the vice president focused too narrowly on minute details, effectively derailing the sessions," the report acknowledged.
The article appears intent on lowering expectations as well. But it also gave the game away as to why Kamala's campaign desperately wants live microphones.
Allies say Harris has had to defend her ideas inside the White House over the last three years, preparing her in some ways for this moment. But Harris is, for all intents and purposes, an out-of-practice debater with people who aren’t her colleagues. Next week’s debate will come just a month shy of four years since she debated Vice President Mike Pence in Utah. For that, aides holed up in a hotel in Salt Lake City days before the debate, as she used index cards to work through talking points — including the now-famous “I’m speaking” line, which one person involved in the session said was a crowdsourced suggestion. [emphasis mine]

So even that line was staged. Is there anything about Harris that isn't fake or staged?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Democrat ERUPTS On CNN After Republican BURSTS HER BUBBLE On Kamala's Trump DERANGED Debate Plan!​



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Democrat Debate Rules BACKFIRE On Harris, Kamala CANT SASS Trump With mics Being Turned Off​

 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
🔥🔥 Yesterday CNBC revealed Kamala’s strategy in a story headlined, “Harris previews her Trump debate plan: ‘I think he’s gonna lie’.” That’s it! That’s the whole debate plan! She “thinks he’s gonna lie.” Ladies and gentlemen, this is the top professional produced by one of the two major political parties to run the world’s most powerful country.

Out of every other Democrat in the country, they delivered a skilled political player who produces deep thoughts like, I think he’s gonna lie. Let’s just agree our Kamala is no Winston Churchill.

The reality is Democrats are desperately hoping just for a gaffe-free ‘debate.’ But they have several reasons to worry. Let us count the ways:

— Tonight will be only the second time that Vice-President Harris has dared speak live in public without a teleprompter since her selection. She has never proven any debating skills.

— To shield Joe from the mean Orange Man, Democrats insisted on a “quiet mic” policy, where only one candidate’s microphone is on at a time. They tried to change the rule for Kamala, but Trump’s team refused. Politico said the muted mic problem has thrown Kamala’s debate strategy into disarray:

image 2.png

Apparently, interrupting people with gotcha moments is Kamala’s trademark, rather than insightful policy or political acumen. She’s best known for waiting for a debate opponent to start talking then barking, “excuse me, I’m speaking!”

This impolite ambushing through interruption is somehow referred to as being a “girl boss.” There’s a whole different post here about how incivility forms the cornerstone of whatever being a “girl boss” is about. This type of drive-by incivility only works when the other person remains constrained by civility. Otherwise the debate devolves into fisticuffs.

Anyway, thanks to the microphone policy, Kamala will be forced to argue her own case, rather than drafting behind President Trump’s comments while yipping and biting at his oratorical heels.

— Kamala is, shall we say, not famous for successfully speaking contemporaneously or even coherently. 2023 Fox headline:



image 3.png


— Kamala performed poorly in the 2020 primary debates. Hardcore Kalama supporters defend her by pointing to the moments where she interrupted hyper-polite Mike Pence, a tactic which, as noted, isn’t on the boards for tonight.

A weekend New York Times/Siena poll of likely voters showed a Harris “stalling,” with Trump up +1 (48% to 47%). The Times somberly noted “the risks … facing Ms. Harris on Tuesday night, when she and Mr. Trump will face off.” What risks?


image 4.png


Joe Biden’s numbers toppled into the polling pit of Hades after his poor debate performance against President Trump. Kamala’s handlers worry the very same thing could happen to her teetering numbers if she comes out looking un-Presidential.


image 5.png


The Democrats understand this debate is an inflection point for Kamala. There will be no do-overs. Headline from this morning’s Hill:


image 7.png


“People are extremely anxious about her performance,” a democrat strategist quoted for the story said. “This is a make-or-break moment for Harris,” he explained. Another strategist said, “She has to get past this debate. It shouldn’t matter as much as it’s going to matter, but it does.”

No pressure!

The Siena/Times poll contained other troubling data points. Nearly half (47%) of likely voters labeled Kamala as being too liberal, versus only a third (32%) who think Trump is too conservative. Only 40% agreed Harris represented “change,” while 55% said she represented “more of the same.” On the other hand, Trump represents “change” to fully 61% of polled likely voters.

— Until this week, the Harris campaign team selected a deliberate strategy of staying vague about Kamala’s policy choices, as part of her basement campaign. But that created a vaccum, which is being filled for her by others. CNN recently republished Kamala’s bizarre 2019 policies, including gimmes like free sex surgeries for illegal migrants, and throwing the border wide open:


image 6.png


CLIP: CNN anchor expresses disbelief about Kamala’s 2019 platform (1:46).

The Cackle Campaign tried to clean up this problem by releasing a brand-new policy statement yesterday that sounded like it could have been written by the Republican National Committee. Tough on the border, with zero mention of transgender issues. Kamala has a lot to memorize by tonight.

— Finally, and maybe the biggest problem facing Kamala’s debate, is that expectations were set very high. Before Joe’s debate, the headlines softened expectations, informing people that debates weren’t Joe’s strong suit, so all he had to do was not bomb.

Not so for Kamala. Until just the last couple days, corporate media emphasized Kamala’s relative youth and dynamism compared to the old man (Trump). Tellingly, they’re trying to walk it back this week. Debate prep must not be going well. But it’s too late.

Kamala could pull it off; she need only hold her own. But given the Times/Siena poll, holding her own probably won’t be enough to halt her stalling poll numbers. She needs a win, which seems unlikely. Remember, it’s 2024, so anything could happen.



 
Top