Yep.Is he the one who got offended when somebody said Baltimore was rat infested?
He was well loved by MDers; especially folks in Baltimore. A lot of blame is thrown on him about the conditions in Baltimore, but there are far more people responsible for that than Cummings. I don't think anything will change as a result of his passing.Sad for his family, sadly good for MD.
As Congressional Representative, he's not responsible for the conditions in Baltimore.He was well loved by MDers; especially folks in Baltimore. A lot of blame is thrown on him about the conditions in Baltimore, but there are far more people responsible for that than Cummings. I don't think anything will change as a result of his passing.
But, I am sad for his family that he had to go so young.
So, happy ending or not?Sad for his family, sadly good for MD.
As Congressional Representative, he's not responsible for the conditions in Baltimore.
He was well loved by some MDers, especially in his gerrymandered district (it seems, since he was re-elected repeatedly). Not sure that made him good for MD - even his gerrymandered district.
As with the other thread of that title, I don't see it as a happy ending. Unless a person is in great pain and chooses of their own volition to die (and even then it's more sad than happy) there's really no such thing as a death being a happy ending, in my opinion.So, happy ending or not?
My knee-jerk reaction was "good; no telling how much damage he's done or could still do," but then I remembered a) his family is likely in mourning, and b) he's only a few years older than me. So: mixed blessing.
One can certainly try and take money from others and use it in the way you describe, but I believe the conditions in a local area are the responsibility of the local people (first and foremost), and of the local government individuals like police, mayors and councilmen, commissioners, dog catchers, etc., etc. If we are going to blame government for conditions, the level we should probably start with is school boards as the key government to blame. Personally, I blame we, the people, much more than the government for local conditions.Pretty sure that you have something to do with conditions in your district. Either ignoring them and playing the DC power game, or working for thier benefit and ensuring your district gets it's share of the endless stream of money pouring out of DC. Either of those things affect the conditions in your district.
Well, there's a conundrum when most of the people in your district, and you yourself believe that all life in America should be in the hands of the Federal (and to a lesser extent the state, as executor of/for) government to improve the quality of life for one and all. Who exactly do you blame when things are not the Utopian dream that an all-knowing, all-powerful Government is supposed to bring about?One can certainly try and take money from others and use it in the way you describe, but I believe the conditions in a local area are the responsibility of the local people (first and foremost), and of the local government individuals like police, mayors and councilmen, commissioners, dog catchers, etc., etc. If we are going to blame government for conditions, the level we should probably start with is school boards as the key government to blame. Personally, I blame we, the people, much more than the government for local conditions.
As I say, I see that as a failure of the school system (if we want to blame government) and the parents/individuals (if we want to go with reality), not a conundrum.Well, there's a conundrum when most of the people in your district, and you yourself believe that all life in America should be in the hands of the Federal (and to a lesser extent the state, as executor of/for) government to improve the quality of life for one and all. Who exactly do you blame when things are not the Utopian dream that an all-knowing, all-powerful Government is supposed to bring about?
They'll appoint someone just like him to fill his seat, then elect someone just like him to replace him permanently. No change for MD.Sad for his family, sadly good for MD.
It's a certainty.Weren't he and the wife knee-deep in corruption and graft, and in some trouble? Guess that'll have to be dropped now that he's a saint.