Well lets just highlight a few items from this article shall we??
The survey was carried out by the UK-based Iraq Body Count and Oxford Research Group - which includes academics and peace activists.
Peace activists?? Now they wouldn't be biased would they??

Survey?? Who did they survey? So this is based on peoples opinions, not facts!!
The Iraqi government criticised their conclusions, saying Iraqis were most at risk from terrorists who target them.
Imagine that. The country suffering the casualties disputes the findings. Smart country!!
The Dossier on Civilian Casualties in Iraq 2003-2005 says 37% of all non-combatant deaths were caused by the US-led coalition.
Based on a survey conducted on who? Proof it was caused by the coalition please....
But killings by anti-occupation and criminal elements also increased steadily over the entire two-year period.
What say you liberals??
"The international forces try to avoid civilian casualties, whereas the terrorists target civilians and try to kill as many of them as they can," it said in a statement.
Again, what say you libs??
"The root cause of Iraq's suffering is terrorism,inherited from Saddam's fascist regime and from mistaken fundamentalist ideology.
You mean the guy we unjustly removed from power?? Nooooooo......... say it aint so!!
More than half of civilian deaths were caused by explosive devices
Ummmmmm....set off by who???
Our data has been extracted from a comprehensive analysis of over 10,000 press and media reports... Our accounting is not complete: only an in-depth, on-the-ground census could come close to achieving that
Ok, which is it? A survey or media reports? We all know how fair and balanced media reports are...
The IBC wants to see an independent commission set up in Iraq to give the best estimate of civilian deaths and full details of how each person died.
Of course you do because you don't know!!!