Ethics complaint on Schiff

[This_person]

It's not,..........unless you are already President and asking a foreign country to do that digging for you and "blackmailing them to do it". Then it's illegal and against the Constitution and the presidential Oath of Office. Impeachable acts , as is covering it up .

Be specific: Where in the Constitution is a president restricted from dealing with a foreign nation to investigate crimes people admit to doing? What is in the oath, specifically, that restricts a president from asking a foreign nation to investigate a crime we know exists?

 

[Rommey]

I see, so you think the republicans have every committee meeting open to the public ?

Don't twist things around to fit your narrative. Of course some Committee hearings are not open to the public, but we are not talking about just ANY run-of-the-mill hearings. There's a lot on the line and the outcome of these hearings will affect virtually everything with the presidency.

You claimed: "they are going by the exact same procedure's that were use [sic] with Clinton and Nixon". But when the Republicans were impacting Clinton, those hearings were in public and not conducted by the Intelligence Committee. So you statement is factually incorrect. The are NOT going by the same EXACT procedures today as they did for Clinton. They are NOT even going by SIMILAR procedures.

 

[Gilligan]

Don't twist things around to fit your narrative. Of course some Committee hearings are not open to the public, but we are not talking about just ANY run-of-the-mill hearings. There's a lot on the line and the outcome of these hearings will affect virtually everything with the presidency.

You claimed: "they are going by the exact same procedure's that were use [sic] with Clinton and Nixon". But when the Republicans were impacting Clinton, those hearings were in public and not conducted by the Intelligence Committee. So you statement is factually incorrect. The are NOT going by the same EXACT procedures today as they did for Clinton. They are NOT even going by SIMILAR procedures.

Buss never cares about the accuracy of anything he spews.

 

[Gilligan]

Be specific: Where in the Constitution is a president restricted from dealing with a foreign nation to investigate crimes people admit to doing? What is in the oath, specifically, that restricts a president from asking a foreign nation to investigate a crime we know exists?

This oughta be good.....

 

[This_person]

This oughta be good.....

Boss ignores obvious questions he can’t answer. When pushed, he says we won’t understand. Classic 3rd grade arguing techniques.

 

[Gilligan]

Boss ignores obvious questions he can’t answer. When pushed, he says we won’t understand. Classic 3rd grade arguing techniques.

Classic narrative parrot too.

 

[Ken King]

It's not,..........unless you are already President and asking a foreign country to do that digging for you and "blackmailing them to do it". Then it's illegal and against the Constitution and the presidential Oath of Office. Impeachable acts , as is covering it up .

There was no "blackmailing them to do it". Matter of fact it is in alignment with "Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters".

 

[The Boss]

There was no "blackmailing them to do it". Matter of fact it is in alignment with "Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters".

So where in your agreement link does it say.,........... "funds will be held up if you do not investigate political rivals of the president."



.............becuase that is what was done and that is a crime .

 

[The Boss]

Boss ignores obvious questions he can’t answer. When pushed, he says we won’t understand. Classic 3rd grade arguing techniques.

LOL, "pushed"...? More like I am the one pushing your buttons ,please respond with more insults ,.........it's what trump does.

 

[The Boss]

Get that temper under control and we might continue.

Now the spin, he answers the question, it doesn't fit the narrative / agenda so you ignore it and attack, becuase you can't answer you spin away from the actual point was he answered your question but you don't like his answer.

 

[The Boss]

Be specific: Where in the Constitution is a president restricted from dealing with a foreign nation to investigate crimes people admit to doing.

you always ignore one part ..........................."political rivals of the president", and holding up funds until it's done , funny how all of you ignore that.

 

[Gilligan]

So where in your agreement link does it say.,........... "funds will be held up if you do not investigate political rivals of the president."



.............becuase that is what was done and that is a crime .

Except you made that up.

 

[Gilligan]

you always ignore one part ..........................."political rivals of the president", and holding up funds until it's done , funny how all of you ignore that.

Where, specifically, are those words in the Constitution?

 

[Gilligan]

LOL, "pushed"...? More like I am the one pushing your buttons ,please respond with more insults ,.........it's what trump does.

But, unlike you, Trump accomplishes things. ;-)

 

[stgislander]

So let's see if I have this straight since it all revolves around Hunter Biden. The only difference between what Biden did (he's on the record saying he did it) and what Trump supposedly did is that Biden is running for President (a political rival to Trump). Got it.

 

[PsyOps]

Now the spin, he answers the question, it doesn't fit the narrative / agenda so you ignore it and attack, becuase you can't answer you spin away from the actual point was he answered your question but you don't like his answer.

I won't have a conversation with someone that can't keep his temper.

There was no crime of digging up dirty from a foreign government. Zelensky has confirmed he was never pressured by Trump to do anything. It's in the transcript that Trump requested Zelensky to look into the Biden thing. He also requested Zelensky look into the Crowdstrike thing. Oh, and now the whistleblower doesn't want to testify. You people just keep wishing for a crime and just can't find one, so you have to make one up.

WHERE'S THE CRIME?

 

[This_person]

LOL, "pushed"...? More like I am the one pushing your buttons ,please respond with more insults ,.........it's what trump does.

I responded to you with questions...questions you refuse to answer.

 

[This_person]

So where in your agreement link does it say.,........... "funds will be held up if you do not investigate political rivals of the president."



.............becuase that is what was done and that is a crime .

What crime? What is the law being violated?

 

[This_person]

you always ignore one part ..........................."political rivals of the president", and holding up funds until it's done , funny how all of you ignore that.

Where is it against the constitution to ask a government to look into crimes admitted by a US citizen?

 

[Rommey]

you always ignore one part ..........................."political rivals of the president", and holding up funds until it's done , funny how all of you ignore that.

Can you point to the exact wording that anyone was trying to "dig up dirt" on political rivals? Do you believe Biden's story about him getting a prosecutor fired by holding up funds?
The funds were held up, but Ukraine didn't know they were being held up. Can you point to any action, any statement, or any evidence that Ukraine did anything that caused those funds to be released?