Executive Nominations
- Thread starter This_person
- Start date
Chuck Schumer is the new Harry Reid, who was the new Tom Daschle. You don't get to a leadership position in the Democrat Party without being a nasty combative ugly lying hypocrite. Schumer is just carrying on the family tradition.
Have they successfully blocked one yet?
This_person
Well-Known Member
It's not about blocking (because, essentially they cannot). It's about making Trump look bad, making him fail....you know, all the stuff they said Republicans were doing to Obama (of course, Republicans approved all nominations with little or no delay in a matter of a couple of days, but truth is not necessary for the people who are only driven by "party-first" mentality.
Marrick Garland
Merrick
Just wondered if they'd continued their winning ways.
"winning" being defined the same way as Charlie Sheen "winning" (i.e. losing your ass)
What Cabinet post in a newly elected administration was he selected for?
Focus, Droopy Drawers, focus...
This_person
Well-Known Member
You've talked about this person many times. Do you understand that there was no requirement to give this person a hearing, or a vote? Do you understand that if it had been the other way around, the left would have done the same thing? Do you understand that when the left would have done the same thing, the right would have argued the same points against it? And, none of that matters a lick because the Senate did nothing wrong. Do you get that?
How do you expect her to get it? She can't even spell his name correctly. And the correct spelling has been pointed out to her many times. :shrug:
This_person
Well-Known Member
Oh, I know. But, TJ does it to make a point that there was a bad action on the part of the R's, which in the "we didn't do it, but if we did your side did it first" philosophy of right and wrong means it's ok to do wrong things. So, I like to point out, "nuh uh, we didn't actually do that."
Childish, but when dealing with a child you must speak the child's language.