Factually true, but....

[This_person]

I did not send classified material, and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified.

Well, no, you won't receive information "marked or designated classified" if you intentionally have the markings removed first, at your order:

If they can’t [send the classified information properly using secure channels, then] turn into nonpaper (sic) w[ith] no identifying heading and send nonsecure

But, we do get to hear all about how Cruz may have filed information about a loan he took out years ago on the wrong form. He filed it, just in some potentially wrong way.

Yep, nothing to see here folks, move along.

 

[Hodr]

But, we do get to hear all about how Cruz may have filed information about a loan he took out years ago on the wrong form. He filed it, just in some potentially wrong way.

I have heard about the Clinton quote and it's impact on her e-mail scandal at least a dozen times in the last couple days. This is the very first time I have heard anything about Cruz not filing information about a loan.

I think maybe the left-wing-liberal-media is not quite as biased as you seem to think.

 

[This_person]

I have heard about the Clinton quote and it's impact on her e-mail scandal at least a dozen times in the last couple days. This is the very first time I have heard anything about Cruz not filing information about a loan.

I think maybe the left-wing-liberal-media is not quite as biased as you seem to think.

For news, while I listen to Fox and MSNBC also, I spend most of my time on CNN of late. I've heard almost nothing (not saying it wasn't there, just that I haven't heard it) about Clinton's most recent revelation, but I've heard twice about some Goldman-Sacs loan that Cruz filed (took it from his own account, not from Goldman), but there is some pencil-pusher who says there was an I not dotted properly, so it's a big deal.

:shrug: Maybe just perception and timing, who knows. But, I feel really sure that the Clinton thing SHOULD be above-the-fold (so to speak), top and bottom of the hour headlining news, with interviews and commentary and all that, every hour, every newspaper. It doesn't feel like that is what is happening. I have not yet heard one call for a special prosecutor, or DoJ investigations, or anything along those lines. I've not heard the president condemn the impropriety (at least) and vow to "get to the truth". I've heard Cruz might have put the right information on the wrong form. Oh, and did you hear he was born in Canada, and Trump's hair looks funny?

 

[Hodr]

I've heard Cruz might have put the right information on the wrong form. Oh, and did you hear he was born in Canada, and Trump's hair looks funny?

I'm starting to think Trump's hair might be a valid point of discussion. My own personal theory, way back in the early 90s it seemed pretty obvious that he had a ginormous comb-over, and it was funny because he always acted like no one would notice or care and if you brought it up he would get quite flustered. Maybe we shouldn't have focused on it, but we did. Then at some point in the early 00's I think, he suddenly gets a sense of humor about his hair. And not only that, he starts letting people pull on it and check that it's not a comb-over and is really just an eccentric hairstyle.

So my personal theory is that he had transplants, or Bosley, or something to that affect, but continued to comb his hair over just so that he could make the claim that he always had hair, that he was never balding. And that to me would seem to say something about the man's capacity for deception and for self-delusion.

Course I could be wrong and he just got a sense of humor during his midlife crisis. It happened to Shatner after all.

 

[This_person]

I'm starting to think Trump's hair might be a valid point of discussion. My own personal theory, way back in the early 90s it seemed pretty obvious that he had a ginormous comb-over, and it was funny because he always acted like no one would notice or care and if you brought it up he would get quite flustered. Maybe we shouldn't have focused on it, but we did. Then at some point in the early 00's I think, he suddenly gets a sense of humor about his hair. And not only that, he starts letting people pull on it and check that it's not a comb-over and is really just an eccentric hairstyle.

So my personal theory is that he had transplants, or Bosley, or something to that affect, but continued to comb his hair over just so that he could make the claim that he always had hair, that he was never balding. And that to me would seem to say something about the man's capacity for deception and for self-delusion.

Course I could be wrong and he just got a sense of humor during his midlife crisis. It happened to Shatner after all.

In today's media, taking on that project would earn you a prime-time special, and asking Josh E. why Clinton hasn't yet been indicted or at least a special prosecutor appointed would earn you a place on the unemployment line.

 

[Bird Dog]

I have heard about the Clinton quote and it's impact on her e-mail scandal at least a dozen times in the last couple days. This is the very first time I have heard anything about Cruz not filing information about a loan.

I think maybe the left-wing-liberal-media is not quite as biased as you seem to think.

It just took them a while to ferret it out. Like Trumps Military School BS...
.......and not unlike the stupid crap they dug up on Romney.....

Hillary's stuff is serious.....