Female

Starman3000m

New Member
You should take some lessons from PsyOps. (He is a man, so it's okay for him to teach you something. :lol:)
Irregardless of whether you hear it nicely from PsyOps or quite bluntly from me - has that really changed anyone's mind? I have seen many thankful comments to PsyOps' replies but the respondent still remains in disagreement with what he sets forth as his faith. The Bible accounts indicate that God's message was given both ways - harsh rebuke and warnings to those who are straying in unbelief and religious deception and on the other hand kind and gentle to those whose spirit is broken and sincerely seeking to place their faith in Jesus Christ as personal Lord and Saviour.

Yes, I agree that PsyOps takes a kinder, gentler approach and that reflects his gentleman's personality. Sorry, but I'm gonna continue to tell it like it is so that in the final analysis it all boils down to the same answer either way that you hear it:

There Is Only One Truth

:buddies:
 

Mr.Steed

New Member
I thought you said you didn't have kids?
The wrath of woman is something men have had to put up with for eons. It's like: "if momma's not happy, no one is happy". It's the way you ladies are wired. The guys have the "off" switch but most of them don't use it.

And, since you say it's not just me, there must be some credibility to it all, eh? Don't get me wrong, I love women! Nothing in the world could replace them for me. God had His stuff together in knowing exactly what would make our hearts throb for you. The downside is all those emotions being unleashed at one time...:jameo: :lmao:

Again, again; it's by God's design. It doesn't mean that women can't take leadership roles at work & in the home & in some aspects of church life. God just doesn't want them pastoring His churches (so as to stay on topic).

There's a reason why women can't tinkle their names in the snow...or lift 400 pounds but that doesn't make them "weak". Men can't have babies because they wouldn't put up with all that is involved, like women do.

If we were all allowed only 3,000 words each day, the men might have some words left over by bedtime but the women would be unable to talk after noon o'clock. See? We're different, but in complimentary ways...

The roles of women & men were defined by God from the beginning. God knew what would happen if they were ignored. We all can see what DID happen today by ignoring God's laws: Broken families, men being more feminine and less responsible, and women taking on more of the responsibility of both partners, etc.

It's kind of a long story but let's just say that men & women are essential to well balanced kids being produced. In a normal family, the man SHOULD give the kids some of his manly qualities: their decision making abilities, their emotional & physical strength and their desire to help & protect others, etc.
The woman SHOULD give the kids some of her feminine qualities: compassion, caring & survival skills that are needed to maintian a good family, etc.

A man can make his boys strong enough to face the world on their own one day, to be a provider and a leader, etc.
He can give his girls their value & self worth so they won't need to go find it in other men on the streets, etc.
A woman gives her boys the compassion that they need so that they won't grow up to be heartless animals, etc.
She gives her girls the nurturing skill they need to take care of themselves and their families later on, etc.

Men & women are not "equal" in the above examples but together they are the "best" at what they each do. Men do lots of things better than women, and vice-versa. It is TOGETHER that they form an invincible bond that is essential to making strong, intelligent kids to carry on in life.
A godly woman understands these things and doesn't fuss about them. She is secure in her femininity and doesn't worry about what the world thinks if she does her "womanly" duties.

This is the biggest load of patronizing cr*p I've read "IS", no wonder you do not have a female partner. I find it incredibly sad that you, Starman, and your like cannot look beyond your smugness. There is a difference between the Old Testament and the New, it's called EVOLUTION. We humans are designed to evolve. The fact that you can't evolve and that you can't understand the contexts in various times in which various religions have been conceived/practiced is beyond me.

The most glaring lapse of your judgment is your refusal to accept that patriarchal based religions were instituted by males to benefit males just as history of the last several thousand years has been written by males through a male perspective (up until recently). Most ancient religions/cultures were centered around matriarchies, in deference to females and their "magical" ability to bring forth life and that which males could not do. In fact, if push came to shove, and I was forced to assign a gender to whatever/whomever created us it would be "female", the bearer of life.

As far as I am concerned, Jesus and other men and women have been here/are here to help guide the human race. Frankly, I give more credence to the idea that we evolved from something extra-terrestrial. We are just a speck in the bigger scheme of things and so is "your" version of Christianity. One day you will understand the erring of your misguided assumptions, not only about men and women, but also about religion and its place in time and space.
 

Starman3000m

New Member
This is the biggest load of patronizing cr*p I've read "IS", no wonder you do not have a female partner. I find it incredibly sad that you, Starman, and your like cannot look beyond your smugness. There is a difference between the Old Testament and the New, it's called EVOLUTION. We humans are designed to evolve. The fact that you can't evolve and that you can't understand the contexts in various times in which various religions have been conceived/practiced is beyond me.

The most glaring lapse of your judgment is your refusal to accept that patriarchal based religions were instituted by males to benefit males just as history of the last several thousand years has been written by males through a male perspective (up until recently). Most ancient religions/cultures were centered around matriarchies, in deference to females and their "magical" ability to bring forth life and that which males could not do. In fact, if push came to shove, and I was forced to assign a gender to whatever/whomever created us it would be "female", the bearer of life.

As far as I am concerned, Jesus and other men and women have been here/are here to help guide the human race. Frankly, I give more credence to the idea that we evolved from something extra-terrestrial. We are just a speck in the bigger scheme of things and so is "your" version of Christianity. One day you will understand the erring of your misguided assumptions, not only about men and women, but also about religion and its place in time and space.
Your thoughts, comments and complaints have been duly noted Mr. Steed.

Have a great weekend. :buddies:
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
Irregardless of whether you hear it nicely from PsyOps or quite bluntly from me - has that really changed anyone's mind?
It might. First impressions can mean a lot, you know. How you approach a conversation can greatly affect its direction, even if your opponent seems obstinate.

If you knew me, M, you would know that I want to hear the truth, whatever it is. If I was "headed for a cliff" I would want to be told.

At the same time, you need to take into account that spirituality is an issue - the greatest issue, in fact - of subjectivity. PsyOps and others understand that and tailor their approaches accordingly. That does not mean you are caving or letting Satan win, but rather that you can admit that you are human and part of this environment as we all are.

You and IS, as much as you agree, present subtle differences in your styles; more evidence of subjectivity and variance. This is NOT a perfect system, no matter how much you contend it is.

With that said, carry on as you wish.




P.S.: "Irregardless" is not a real word. :wink:
 

Zguy28

New Member
This is the biggest load of patronizing cr*p I've read "IS", no wonder you do not have a female partner. I find it incredibly sad that you, Starman, and your like cannot look beyond your smugness. There is a difference between the Old Testament and the New, it's called EVOLUTION. We humans are designed to evolve. The fact that you can't evolve and that you can't understand the contexts in various times in which various religions have been conceived/practiced is beyond me.

The most glaring lapse of your judgment is your refusal to accept that patriarchal based religions were instituted by males to benefit males just as history of the last several thousand years has been written by males through a male perspective (up until recently). Most ancient religions/cultures were centered around matriarchies, in deference to females and their "magical" ability to bring forth life and that which males could not do. In fact, if push came to shove, and I was forced to assign a gender to whatever/whomever created us it would be "female", the bearer of life.

As far as I am concerned, Jesus and other men and women have been here/are here to help guide the human race. Frankly, I give more credence to the idea that we evolved from something extra-terrestrial. We are just a speck in the bigger scheme of things and so is "your" version of Christianity. One day you will understand the erring of your misguided assumptions, not only about men and women, but also about religion and its place in time and space.
Spoken like a true humanist. Hopefully somebody such as yourself will never be given governing power of any sort.
 

Starman3000m

New Member
It might. First impressions can mean a lot, you know. How you approach a conversation can greatly affect its direction, even if your opponent seems obstinate.

If you knew me, M, you would know that I want to hear the truth, whatever it is. If I was "headed for a cliff" I would want to be told.

At the same time, you need to take into account that spirituality is an issue - the greatest issue, in fact - of subjectivity. PsyOps and others understand that and tailor their approaches accordingly. That does not mean you are caving or letting Satan win, but rather that you can admit that you are human and part of this environment as we all are.

You and IS, as much as you agree, present subtle differences in your styles; more evidence of subjectivity and variance. This is NOT a perfect system, no matter how much you contend it is.

With that said, carry on as you wish.

P.S.: "Irregardless" is not a real word. :wink:
Thanks for your comments, hvp05, and for the grammar correction ("irregardless" of how the word is commonly spoken - LOL)

I totally agree that first impressions can mean a lot but I also know that when I try to "nicely" engage those who are in disagreement the more their true colors show within a short time because they are offended at being challenged. It's no surprise that even Jesus stated that His Truth would be an offense to those who do not want to hear it.

Do you really want to know the Truth hvp05? Take some time to read the New Testament accounts of the Holy Bible. Think upon what you read and seek the Truth about God, Jesus and your personal salvation. Your answers will be found there my friend.

As always - There Is Only One Truth:buddies:
 

ItalianScallion

Harley Rider
Then you need to look for 'normal' women :lol: problem for you is that - in my experience - these women do not generally frequent the type of church you would approve of.
If I could find ONE normal woman, I can assure you I wouldn't let her get away...
 
Last edited:

ItalianScallion

Harley Rider
This is the biggest load of patronizing cr*p I've read "IS", no wonder you do not have a female partner. I find it incredibly sad that you, Starman, and your like cannot look beyond your smugness. There is a difference between the Old Testament and the New, it's called EVOLUTION. We humans are designed to evolve. The fact that you can't evolve and that you can't understand the contexts in various times in which various religions have been conceived/practiced is beyond me.

The most glaring lapse of your judgment is your refusal to accept that patriarchal based religions were instituted by males to benefit males just as history of the last several thousand years has been written by males through a male perspective (up until recently). Most ancient religions/cultures were centered around matriarchies, in deference to females and their "magical" ability to bring forth life and that which males could not do. In fact, if push came to shove, and I was forced to assign a gender to whatever/whomever created us it would be "female", the bearer of life.

As far as I am concerned, Jesus and other men and women have been here/are here to help guide the human race. Frankly, I give more credence to the idea that we evolved from something extra-terrestrial. We are just a speck in the bigger scheme of things and so is "your" version of Christianity. One day you will understand the erring of your misguided assumptions, not only about men and women, but also about religion and its place in time and space.
Another with the personal attacks...:duh: You've obviously you've bought into the New Age beliefs. Sounds like Mr Steed is a Mrs...
Me? Patronizing? Those are God's own words!
The Bible evolved?
God evolved? When HE said He doesn't change??
And God is a male chauvanist and should have made things "female?? WOW! Just WOW! Please tell me what belief system you follow so I won't have to guess... :faint:
 

UNA

New Member
If I could fine ONE normal woman, I can assure you I wouldn't let her get away...
You're obviously either a) looking in the wrong places, b) waiting for a woman what will bow down to you or c) are so jaded WRT to women that you will never find one that you don't have a problem with. There are plenty of women that are not how you describe.

Honestly; you've got such a misogynistic opinion of women it's no wonder you haven't found one to settle down with!
 

thatguy

New Member
Wirelessly posted

ItalianScallion said:
Then you need to look for 'normal' women :lol: problem for you is that - in my experience - these women do not generally frequent the type of church you would approve of.
If I could fine ONE normal woman, I can assure you I wouldn't let her get away...
There are plenty of normal women out there. It's just that normal women have their own opinions and certainly Rent going to allow themselves to be subjugated by the likes of you. I would imAgine that only 'touched' women would even consider a second conversation with you, let alone a date
 

ItalianScallion

Harley Rider
You're obviously either a) looking in the wrong places, b) waiting for a woman what will bow down to you or c) are so jaded WRT to women that you will never find one that you don't have a problem with. There are plenty of women that are not how you describe. Honestly; you've got such a misogynistic opinion of women it's no wonder you haven't found one to settle down with!
Gee thanks for the lesson, babe! :buddies: :duh:
Relax: I'm just yanking your chain a bit...:killingme
 

ItalianScallion

Harley Rider
There are plenty of normal women out there. It's just that normal women have their own opinions and certainly Rent going to allow themselves to be subjugated by the likes of you. I would imAgine that only 'touched' women would even consider a second conversation with you, let alone a date
Good to know; Thanks, I'll keep that in mind...:buddies: :duh:
 

UNA

New Member
Wirelessly posted

ItalianScallion said:
You're obviously either a) looking in the wrong places, b) waiting for a woman what will bow down to you or c) are so jaded WRT to women that you will never find one that you don't have a problem with. There are plenty of women that are not how you describe. Honestly; you've got such a misogynistic opinion of women it's no wonder you haven't found one to settle down with!
Gee thanks for the lesson, babe! :buddies: :duh:
Relax: I'm just yanking your chain a bit...:killingme
So where did you get the ideas you have about women? Seriously, not trying to start anything; genuinely curious!
 
Top