Fireworks or something like it

alex

Member
I have to do some webpages at the office. They have purchased Dreamweaver MX 2004 which I really like. But now I need an easy way to the graphics - banners, buttons, etc. I downloaded the trial of Fireworks and really like program. I know I can do the buttons in Dreamwever but Fireworks makes it so much faster. However, there is no way they are going to spend $300 for that program since they wouldn't even buy the Studio MX when I asked.

So here is my question can someone recommend another program that is not as expensive as Fireworks but is just as easy to use? Oh - it should also work on both Mac's and PC's if possible.
 
K

Kain99

Guest
What about Adobe? The suite or Photoshop? My personal opinion is, that Fireworks doesn't hold a candle. :kiss:
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
alex said:
I have to do some webpages at the office. They have purchased Dreamweaver MX 2004 which I really like. But now I need an easy way to the graphics - banners, buttons, etc. I downloaded the trial of Fireworks and really like program. I know I can do the buttons in Dreamwever but Fireworks makes it so much faster. However, there is no way they are going to spend $300 for that program since they wouldn't even buy the Studio MX when I asked.

So here is my question can someone recommend another program that is not as expensive as Fireworks but is just as easy to use? Oh - it should also work on both Mac's and PC's if possible.
I was going to suggest GIMP, which is free, but it is on Linux.
 

Tonio

Asperger's Poster Child
I do buttons as table cells, setting the border and background colors to get the look I want. I use JavaScript to change the background and text colors when the user rolls over the buttons. I'm not a fan of images as buttons, because it's more work to create a new button with new text if you have to redo the site navigational structure.
 

TWL

Kernel panic: Aiee.......
2ndAmendment said:
I was going to suggest GIMP, which is free, but it is on Linux.
The GIMP is also available for Win32 and MacOSX. www.gimp.org


Tonio said:
I do buttons as table cells, setting the border and background colors to get the look I want. I use JavaScript to change the background and text colors when the user rolls over the buttons. I'm not a fan of images as buttons, because it's more work to create a new button with new text if you have to redo the site navigational structure.
:yeahthat: Plus less images = quicker load time.
 

tirdun

staring into the abyss
Tonio said:
I do buttons as table cells, setting the border and background colors to get the look I want.

I'd use CSS for this, rather than tables. It loads faster and you avoid nightmarish table layouts. It takes some time to convert and adjust, though. There are also IMHO some real issues with box formatting using CSS that CSS 2 and 3 don't seem to address.

As for GIMP, I like the program, but it's got a big learning curve. It can do just about anything, if you know how. Macromedia's programs are nice, but they tend to be expensive and are a little too "no-no do it our way" for me.

I use Paintshop Pro for image work, it's like $90 bucks.
 

Tonio

Asperger's Poster Child
tirdun said:
I'd use CSS for this, rather than tables.
Are you talking about using DIVs positioned through the style sheet? I tried that for a test page, but I was getting some weird results with older browsers.
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
Tonio said:
Are you talking about using DIVs positioned through the style sheet? I tried that for a test page, but I was getting some weird results with older browsers.
Put a browser update link on the page. I run all my pages through W3C validation. I hand pound most of my pages. Fewer validation errors that way.

I ran Microsoft's home page through the W3C validation and it had over 100 errors on it. :lol: Front Page creates a lot of errors.
 

Tonio

Asperger's Poster Child
If I were in charge of the universe, all browsers would conform 100% to the W3C standards. I've often found that code that meets the W3C validation still has problems in some browsers.

I know the government has some disability access requirements for all agency Web sites. The code on these sites has to be readable by the assistive devices that some disabled people have on their computers.
 
Top