We were concerned with them for eight long years, but the point is moot now that they've left and lost 2016.
first Charges supposedly filed in Mueller investigation
- Thread starter Midnightrider
- Start date
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
if any of that other #### is true, why hasn’t trump appointed a Sc to look into it?
It's because these people are idiots and don't know when they are being lied to and used like pawns.
"But instead of joining his supporters in the calls to prosecute her, the former reality star told the crowd in Grand Rapids, Michigan: “That plays great before the election ... nah, we don’t care."
The Republican ruled out prosecuting Ms Clinton in the days after the election, saying it was “no longer something he felt so strongly about” and he did not want to hurt the family.
He told the New York Times: “Look, I want to move forward, I don’t want to move back. And I don’t want to hurt the Clintons. I really don’t."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/donald-trump-latest-hillary-clinton-lock-her-up-we-dont-care-us-elections-campaign-promise-a7467071.html
So you’re saying he’s a nice guy........
I'm saying he is a liar who used the lack of education and misinformation provided to his supporters to manipulate them.
You need to go back to your safe space for a couple days again......it’s going to be a long 8 years
He and MR should meet back at Applebees.
You might want to read a newspaper.
It's obvious I am right/ So he decided to be nice after the election out of the goodness of his heart? What are you even saying? Do you even know?
Mr. Trump isn't always right.
He tried to emulate other Presidents in not prosecuting an former First lady or even a former President.
It was a mistake. He should have burned them both.
We all see what it got him. Instead of appreciation he got rudeness and accusations.
He tried to emulate other Presidents in not prosecuting an former First lady or even a former President.
It was a mistake. He should have burned them both.
We all see what it got him. Instead of appreciation he got rudeness and accusations.
This_person
Well-Known Member
Well, the criminals that have resided in the White House are part of whom I speak. I am great with criminals being charged. I am hoping for more
PsyOps
Pixelated
Well, not intentionally, but you are a confusing person.
PsyOps
Pixelated
Up to this point, there still is nothing pointing at Trump. I will keep saying it... there are you folks that are absolutely convinced that Trump colluded with the Russians to win the election. It seems so clear to you, but Meuller hasn't gotten there yet. What is it, other than you just wishing it's true, that you're seeing that Meuller isn't at this point?
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
I know you really want that to be my position, but I have stated from the beginning that it should be investigated and whoever is found to have done something illegal should be prosecuted.
You bar has moved quite a bit on the other hand. First it was ‘no collusion’ then It went to ‘no illegal activity’, and no you are at ‘no direct evidence that trump colluded’.
As I said before, let’s see where the investigation goes. It is abundantly clear that there was some collusion and some illegal activity in the campaign
This_person
Well-Known Member
If it is "abundantly clear", please explain what the collusion was that affected the outcome of the election? If it is "abundantly clear", what was the campaign's illegal activity?
I don't think "abundantly clear" means what you think it means.
PsyOps
Pixelated
If it’s abundantly clear, then you must know who colluded with whom. What evidence makes it clear to you, I mean aside from the fact that some people like Flynn and Manafort held meetings with some Russians? If that’s what you’re calling collusion, what was illegal about it, and how did those meetings affect the outcome of the election?
My bar hasn’t changed at all. I have seen nothing to indicate that Trump or anyone else in their campaign colluded in order to affect the outcome of the election. And THAT has been the accusation. So, if I’ve seen no evidence to convince me the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to affect the outcome, that’s akin to saying ‘no collusion’. You’ve jumped over that by simply saying there’s been collusion; maybe not illegal, but there is collusion. Well, if nothing illegal has happened, then why all of this investigating? If you continue to demand this investigation go on, then you must believe something illegal has happened.
He's just being abundantly obtuse....as usual.
Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
read papas guilty plea again. He clearly admits arranging meetings with the Russians and getting those approved by campaign management. That is abundantly clear evidence of collusion. As for the illegal parts, some of them have been described in the charging documents and the rest you will just have to wait for. Mueller is investigating it.
That bolded part is where you changed the bar this time. It’s no surprise as the collusion has been proven in two seperate instance now.
It is abundantly clear. If you can’t see that you are blind. Yet you have no problem believing conspiracy theories about pedophalia that are completely unfounded and claim that you aren’t biased.