Of course the low income, uninformed psychos would vote for "Miss Entitilist"rraley said:A nice poll from Quinnipiac University...
Hypothetical match-ups...
Clinton: 60%
Pataki: 31%
Clinton: 50%
Guiliani: 44% (the GOP's top choice for presidential nominee in 2008)
awesome stuff
vraiblonde said:Poll from the Gude household:
George Pataki: 60%
Hillary Clinton: 0%
Undecided: 40%
Rudy Giuliani: 80%
Hillary Clinton: 0%
Undecided: 20%
Awesome stuff!![]()
rraley said:A nice poll from Quinnipiac University...
Hypothetical match-ups...
Clinton: 60%
Pataki: 31%
Clinton: 50%
Guiliani: 44% (the GOP's top choice for presidential nominee in 2008)
awesome stuff
To her credit, Janey is a staunch Republican. (I almost said "Bush supporter" but I know where y'all would have taken that!!)itsbob said:Biggest flaw in this poll is Quinnipiac UNIVERSITY.. try to take a poll where the pollees aren't getting liberalism stuffed down their throats EVERY day.. Hmmm have to wonder, is Janey a Hillary fan.. ??
As for the University thing, I have to say that I agree that it's not the right place for this type of poll to reflect anything approaching neutral bias.
A nice poll from Quinnipiac University...
Hypothetical match-ups...
Clinton: 60%
Pataki: 31%
Clinton: 50%
Guiliani: 44% (the GOP's top choice for presidential nominee in 2008)
Check it out:ylexot said:To be fair, universities do run polls that are larger than just the university. Some do nationwide polls. However, rraley provided no information about the poll to make it at all useful. Who was polled would be the biggest question. Not knowing how the poll was conducted makes the numbers useless.
SamSpade said:Check it out:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x14708.xml
Since it looks like just New York voters, I'm not impressed or worried.
ylexot said:To be fair, universities do run polls that are larger than just the university. Some do nationwide polls. However, rraley provided no information about the poll to make it at all useful. Who was polled would be the biggest question. Not knowing how the poll was conducted makes the numbers useless.
The elections sound even worse if you consider that in 92 and 96, Clinton didn't even get 50%, and he's far and away the most popular Democratic candidate in years. The last Democrat to get more than 50% was Jimmy Carter - 50.08%, actually. You really gotta go back to Johnson's blowout of Goldwater for a big win. Even Kennedy and Truman were squeakers, and even THEY didn't get 50% of the vote.SmallTown said:Note to dems: You're lost the last two elections. It will be difficult enough just to get in the whitehouse again, don't lessen your chances by having a woman (sort of) on your ticket. Stick to the basics.
vraiblonde said:I don't hate Hillary.