How do you know that?
This is why these internet discussions piss me off: information is given, then people just sit around and make up crap to "support" whatever viewpoint they've decided to take.
Chris, you want everyone to stick with the facts, so how about you do the same.
I don't know that, nor did I claim to. In a country where 77% of the population identify as a Christian, I'd say it's a good possibility. Which is what I eluded to in the 8th post of this thread:
"I'd be willing to bet that the very teacher that gave her this assignment was, *gasp* Christian."
I don't necessarily view it as indoctrination, I'm just wondering why our schools are suddenly teaching religion when in the past they've been so hell bent (ha) on prohibiting any religious expression at all. You say it's part of world history, but two weeks of it?? And specific assignments about it? Good lord, there's so much to teach with regard to world history that specific religious practices shouldn't even be a part of it in any meaningful way.
I think any rational person would question why this is such a large part of public school curriculum.
"Large part"?? That's assuming it was 2 full weeks of talking about it. 2 full weeks, yet the dad came up with a power point and a single assignment?
Anyway, this was a World History class. In the assignment, there are questions regarding Islam relating to history (The entire 2nd exhibit).
It's been awhile since I was in high school, but I specifically remember things like this being taught.
Why do you feel the need to swear to make your point? There's something moderately hypocritical about an avowed atheist taking the lords name in vain.
I'm an agnostic swear-er (and I tend to cuss, a lot). If I don't believe there's a "god", I'm technically not using his name in vain, am I? I certainly don't use that or "Oh Jesus Christ" or similar phrases in order to piss anyone off.
You would certainly mention it but not do a whole unit on it. Religion is so intangible and personal that there's no way any teacher could possibly cover it in any meaningful way. You could spend a whole school year just on the various denominations of Christianity alone and still only touch on the basics.
Is it correct that they spent 2 weeks of class time on Islam alone? Or did I misunderstand that? I looked at the Exhibits filed and that seems like an AWFUL lot of detail just on one religion, not to mention it's highly subjective and biased. "Radicals are only a small percentage of Muslims...." They don't know that, so why is it being taught?
I think the family is right in challenging this.
So if a teacher can't teach something as profound as religion in any meaningful way, why do you believe the family is correct in the fact that the school in indoctrinating their daughter to Islam?
I'll disagree whole-heartedly that those few questions are too much when discussing the past and modern teachings and information of one of the largest and oldest religions in history.
The last paragraph of yours is a bit different from your previous postings. I'm pretty sure you've admitted that in a world where Islam is the largest, radical Muslims make up a small percentage.
The far left has an overwhelming need to apologize for things real or imaginary. Since we've been at war with "not Islam" for the last couple of decades we've got to apologize and show that there are no hard feelings.
Perhaps you can point to what you believe to be "apologizing"?
Since religion is a matter of faith and not fact, there's no way some teacher or whoever designs the curriculum could be objective about it. Or even universally knowledgeable, for that matter. You can't even just say, "These people believe this..." because there is no religion where all the adherents believe exactly the same thing.
I think teachings of faith have no place in public school. Once you get all the kids so they can communicate effectively, read for context, write a coherent sentence, and do maths accurately, then maybe we can worry about teaching them religion.
Sure, but the facts about how that religion came to be and how they shaped a certain portion of the world in a World History class is something that should be taught, no?
Or should religion not be brought up when discussing world history?
I'd agree with you if it seemed like the school was trying to teach someone to be Christian, Muslim, etc., but I just don't see that here. 2 weeks (assumed) of discussing the origins up to modern times of Islam shouldn't worry someone as devout as this guy and his family (as he claims). If the story is how he told it, then the school could have handled someone who gets their panties in a wad better (be more PC, the thing we've rallied against when discussing Trump), but the terms of this lawsuit are ridiculous with no proof of his claims.