Fox Reshuffling

Wishbone

New Member
...

Bolling’s show, The Fox News Specialists, was canceled last week and he was banished from the network. A day later, Bolling’s son died. Some news outlets reported the younger Bolling succumbed to a drug overdose; others said suicide.

Because Bolling’s 5 p.m show was canceled, Fox plans to move the lightweight panel chat “The Five” back to 5 p.m. from its inappropriate 9 p.m. slot. Fox could have moved Ingraham into 9 p.m.to compete woman-to-woman against the formidable Maddow.



http://observer.com/2017/09/in-hannity-vs-maddow-polar-opposites-will-go-head-to-head/
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Ugh. Why do they keep messing with their lineup??? The Five belongs in prime time, not as a lead in. I'm looking forward to Laura Ingraham - they should replace Tucker Carlson with her. Hannity...ugh. Ugh ugh ugh.

But I'll wait and see what really happens because Observer is clearly a Rachel Maddow fan site, which means they are insane and don't know ####. They're also Trump haters, which is just monotonous and boring.
 

Wishbone

New Member
Ugh. Why do they keep messing with their lineup??? The Five belongs in prime time, not as a lead in. I'm looking forward to Laura Ingraham - they should replace Tucker Carlson with her. Hannity...ugh. Ugh ugh ugh.

But I'll wait and see what really happens because Observer is clearly a Rachel Maddow fan site, which means they are insane and don't know ####. They're also Trump haters, which is just monotonous and boring.
The source aside, it seems likely that Fox would start manipulating the lineup to gain market share.

I really think they should have stood with Eric Bolling though. He WAS a decent anchor for them and they lost a show that started out fairly well by sidelining him.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
The source aside, it seems likely that Fox would start manipulating the lineup to gain market share.

I really think they should have stood with Eric Bolling though. He WAS a decent anchor for them and they lost a show that started out fairly well by sidelining him.
They should have stood with Bill O'Reilly because he was their top draw. Honestly, they're not going to gain market share by alienating their base and if they think they can pull progbots over they are delusional.
 

Wishbone

New Member
They should have stood with Bill O'Reilly because he was their top draw. Honestly, they're not going to gain market share by alienating their base and if they think they can pull progbots over they are delusional.
Forgot about O'Reilly. He was never one i watched, but your statement is spot on.

The children are running the network into the ground.
 

black dog

Free America
PREMO Member
WTF Fox,, the second Steve Wilkos Show from 2 to 3 is off the air. A show called the Daily Mail has taken it's place..
 
Top