Freedom of Speech Is Dead - UK Edition

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member








New Justice Secretary Mahmood’s Past of Promoting “Mob Rule”


Shabana Mahmood, the UK’s new Secretary of State for Justice, brings a troubling record to her new role. In 2014, she was accused of promoting “mob rule” after leading a protest backing the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel, forcing a Sainsbury’s in Birmingham to close for hours. Taking the law into her own hands…

She later boasted of the Sainsbury’s shutdown to a rally:

“Last week I was with 200 activists outside in the centre of Birmingham and we lay down in the street and we lay down inside Sainsbury’s to say that we object to Sainsbury’s stocking goods from the illegal settlements and that they must stop. We managed to close down that store for 5 hours at peak time on a Saturday. This is how we can make a difference.”


At the time, she was slammed by Mike Freer, then MP for Finchley and Golders Green: “For any Parliamentarian to encourage mob rule as a way of protesting is shameful.” Is this the sort of enforcement of justice Mahmood will be promoting as the new Secretary of State?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

UK Prepares to Go Full Fascist in Crackdown on Internet









It's unclear just how much of the rioting in Great Britain last week was carried out by the "right-wing" and how much was conducted by other parties, including Muslim mobs. By midweek, the authorities were predicting "hundreds of riots." Either they were misinformed or it was a hoax. Most of the "riots" turned out to be small groups of angry locals upset at the inaction of police. There were just as many angry Muslims confronting them, protesting against the disinformation that tied their community to the murders of children attending a dance class.

It will soon be illegal to express views against migration in Great Britain. There have already been several arrests of people who opposed migration online.

Anil Kanti “Neil” Basu, who served as the top counter-terror police officer said anti-migration riots should be treated as "terrorism."

“I think we have seen serious acts of violence designed to cause terror to a section of our community,” he told the BBC.


And Prime Minister Keir Starmer made an explicit threat that the age of free speech in England was coming to an end. The Guardian reports that he said “we’re going to have to look more broadly at social media after this disorder.” Starmer said there would be “sentencing for online behavior” in courts today, and also said “whether you’re directly involved or whether you’re remotely involved, you’re culpable, and you will be put before the court."

Breitbart:

Critics say the government’s new slogan “think before your post” is a little too Orwellian for comfort, but some have already been caught up in that net. Cheshire Police boasted on Thursday evening they had arrested a woman “in connection with inaccurate social media post”, stating “a woman in relation to social media post containing inaccurate information about the identity of the attacker in the Southport murders.”

The leader of civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, Silkie Carlo, expressed alarm at this language from the Police, stating their press release was “so badly written” — generously overlooking the possibility it was meant to be deliberately vague. Offering her interpretation of the law, Carlo claimed that it is not, in fact, an offence to accidentally post inaccurate information on social media unless it was intentional stirring of racial hatred or knowingly publishing false information intending to cause non-trivial harm.

Reuters reports that YouGov "published a survey of more than 2,000 adults, which found two-thirds (66%) believe social media companies should be held responsible for posts inciting criminal behavior."

Also, "A further 70% of respondents said social media companies were not strongly regulated enough, and 71% said they did not do enough to counter misinformation while the riots were ongoing."

There's not going to be much of an outcry if the Brits' freedoms are taken away. That's because they're not going to miss what they never had. There is no "freedom of speech" per se in Great Britain. This is evidenced by the new online speech law that was supposed to go into effect until early next year.

The "Online Safety Act" frames freedom of speech as a "safety" issue. It's a poor disguise to control people's thoughts and speech.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The United Kingdom's government is in a bit of a pickle right now. Three little girls under the age of 10 were stabbed to death at a dance camp, sparking riots. These weren't the run-of-the-mill Muslim migrant riots the police are used to ignoring, though —there were "far-right," white British natives who'd had enough. The reaction from Prime Minister Kier Starmer was swift, with police arresting citizens over Facebook posts and threatening to arrest any "curious observers" who were even watching, and not participating in, the riots.

The government blames social media for the riots, and the European Commission has even suggested extraditing Elon Musk and putting him on trial in the U.K. Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland writes:

One man is missing. Of course, it’s good that so many of those responsible for a week of terrifying far-right violence are facing an especially swift and severe form of justice – but there’s one extremely rich and powerful suspect who should join them in the dock. If the UK authorities truly want to hold accountable all those who unleashed riots and pogroms in Britain, they need to go after Elon Musk.

Let’s remind ourselves who brought Robinson and a whole slew of far-right agitators back in from the cold, thereby putting X out of step with the likes of YouTube and Facebook. It was Musk, of course. He decided to make X a safe space for racism and hate almost as soon as he bought it. The effect was instant. One analysis of tweets found a “nearly 500% increase in use of the N-word in the 12-hour window immediately following the shift of ownership to Musk”. The same study also found that posts including “the word ‘Jew’ had increased fivefold since before the ownership transfer”, and something tells me those tweets weren’t tributes to the comic style of Mel Brooks.


This editor calls bulls**t on that analysis of tweets containing the N-word. We're all on X all day, every day, and we didn't see it.

Author and columnist Douglas Murray notes that the same columnist calling for Musk's arrest wrote a book fantasizing about the assassination of a president a few years back under a pseudonym.












 
Top