Ga. hand recount confirms Biden’s lead; president-elect speaks virtually with governors

gunsmoke

Active Member
Ga. hand recount confirms Biden’s lead; president-elect speaks virtually with governors
After a hand recount of roughly 5 million votes cast in the presidential election, Georgia election officials confirmed President-elect Joe Biden received more votes than President Trump in the state.

Georgia’s secretary of state ordered the recount as a part of the risk-limiting audit process to ensure the public’s trust in the outcome of the presidential vote in the state, where Biden led by 12,284 votes, according to the audited results. That resulted in a 0.0099 percent variation from the original margin, they said.
.0099 variation. Maybe the bot will shut up now??

TRUMP LOST!! TRUMP LOST!! TRUMP LOST!! TRUMP LOST!! TRUMP LOST!!


:bann::bann::bann::bann::bann::bann::bann::bann::bann::bann:

TRUMP LOST!! TRUMP LOST!! TRUMP LOST!! TRUMP LOST!! TRUMP LOST!!
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
“Headlines are already falsely reporting that Joe Biden is declared the winner in Georgia. Sorry, media, that’s not how it works. The State of Georgia has not certified its results, and it should not,” Ellis said in a statement.

“This so-called hand recount went exactly as we expected because Georgia simply recounted all of the illegal ballots that had been included in the total,” she argued. “We continue to demand that Georgia conduct an honest recount, which includes signature matching. We intend to pursue all legal options to ensure that only legal ballots are counted.”

Ellis is correct that Georgia has not certified its results, but the Associated Press did call the race for Biden. Her fact-check boils down to the question of what it means for Biden to be “declared the winner.”

 

PsyOps

Pixelated
“Headlines are already falsely reporting that Joe Biden is declared the winner in Georgia. Sorry, media, that’s not how it works. The State of Georgia has not certified its results, and it should not,” Ellis said in a statement.

“This so-called hand recount went exactly as we expected because Georgia simply recounted all of the illegal ballots that had been included in the total,” she argued. “We continue to demand that Georgia conduct an honest recount, which includes signature matching. We intend to pursue all legal options to ensure that only legal ballots are counted.”

Ellis is correct that Georgia has not certified its results, but the Associated Press did call the race for Biden. Her fact-check boils down to the question of what it means for Biden to be “declared the winner.”

While I do believe widespread fraud occurred, Biden will be president. The thing that allowed this fraud to occur is the same thing that will allow it to stand. This became astonishingly clear when Fox called the race and brazingly stuck to their decision by becoming confrontational to anyone that disagreed with them.
 

SkylarkTempest

Active Member
While I do believe widespread fraud occurred, Biden will be president. The thing that allowed this fraud to occur is the same thing that will allow it to stand. This became astonishingly clear when Fox called the race and brazingly stuck to their decision by becoming confrontational to anyone that disagreed with them.
Why do you believe widespread fraud occurred? No evidence has yet been presented.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Active Member
Why do you believe widespread fraud occurred? No evidence has yet been presented.
I thought it was collusion with Russia! They should announce their intention to impeach before inauguration. On. A real note you must be proud to let the media and elitist decide who is our next president. Maybe 2024 we should just skip the election entirely. :sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm: I mean really if you don’t think there was any fraud at all in this election regardless of which side the ballots were for. ...well then you are an idiot. Cut and dry. Now Biden is going to be our next president and that I accepted, was it legitimate? Probably not. My biggest concern is future elections. That’s the issue at hand is prevention in the future. If we don’t fix it for future elections it very well could be done you the candidate of your choice and then what? Frankly everyone here will tell you to piss off because that what you and your democrat party have been doing to everyone else. What comes around goes around. Keep that in mind.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Why do you believe widespread fraud occurred? No evidence has yet been presented.
You either believe Giuliani, Powell, Ellis, and diGenova are lying or telling the truth when they say they have hundreds of sworn affidavits to voter fraud. Whether the machines were rigged to flip votes, that will have to play out in court.

That aside... I sensed fraud was set up when you liberals pushed this stupid mail-in ballot thing. States pushed out ballots without requests. Thousands of ballots showed up in trucks in the dead of night. Republican observers were kept out of the counting rooms. And you don't even ask "WTF"? Well, the little I know about you on this forum, that really doesn't surprise me.

Tell me... did you buy into the Trump collusion nonsense - the Russians got Trump elected in 2016?
 

SkylarkTempest

Active Member
I thought it was collusion with Russia! They should announce their intention to impeach before inauguration. On. A real note you must be proud to let the media and elitist decide who is our next president. Maybe 2024 we should just skip the election entirely. :sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm: I mean really if you don’t think there was any fraud at all in this election regardless of which side the ballots were for. ...well then you are an idiot. Cut and dry. Now Biden is going to be our next president and that I accepted, was it legitimate? Probably not. My biggest concern is future elections. That’s the issue at hand is prevention in the future. If we don’t fix it for future elections it very well could be done you the candidate of your choice and then what? Frankly everyone here will tell you to piss off because that what you and your democrat party have been doing to everyone else. What comes around goes around. Keep that in mind.
Evidence?
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Active Member
Evidence?
That’s what investigations are for genius!! Gather evidence. If it’s there the may find it if not then oh well. It’s called due process and I guarantee damn tee you if the shoe was on the other foot and your boy Biden was questioning the vote totals you would be singing a different tune. So like I stated early on when this took of us let it play out. Let the courts decide, if they have the evidence it will surface, if not then the courts squash it and America moves on. My net even if they did find evidence the MSM would censor it anyways.
 

SkylarkTempest

Active Member
You either believe Giuliani, Powell, Ellis, and diGenova are lying or telling the truth when they say they have hundreds of sworn affidavits to voter fraud. Whether the machines were rigged to flip votes, that will have to play out in court.

That aside... I sensed fraud was set up when you liberals pushed this stupid mail-in ballot thing. States pushed out ballots without requests. Thousands of ballots showed up in trucks in the dead of night. Republican observers were kept out of the counting rooms. And you don't even ask "WTF"? Well, the little I know about you on this forum, that really doesn't surprise me.

Tell me... did you buy into the Trump collusion nonsense - the Russians got Trump elected in 2016?
I was definitely for an investigation into Russian influence, as was a bipartisan group of lawmakers. Trump's own man, Rosenstein, was the one who appointed Mueller, and I have no reason to question the findings of the investigation. There is no doubt, on both sides of the aisle (and from our intelligence community), that Russia interfered with the election. Whether their influence had an effect is impossible to determine. Some people believe the suppression of information by Facebook and Google had an effect on the outcome of this election. If true, then I don't see why the infusion of Russian propaganda last election wouldn't have an effect, too. But again, it's impossible to know for sure.

As far as widespread fraud, I'll wait until evidence is presented. I haven't seen any. Claims of "hundreds of affidavits" means nothing unless we know what's in them. I saw a woman on Fox Business the other day making claims of voter fraud because she saw food trucks that couldn't possibly hold enough food for the staff. I mean, if that is the kind of claims these affidavits are filled with, I think we can rest assured our electoral system is safe and secure, as DHS has claimed.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
That’s what investigations are for genius!! Gather evidence. If it’s there the may find it if not then oh well. It’s called due process and I guarantee damn tee you if the shoe was on the other foot and your boy Biden was questioning the vote totals you would be singing a different tune. So like I stated early on when this took of us let it play out. Let the courts decide, if they have the evidence it will surface, if not then the courts squash it and America moves on. My net even if they did find evidence the MSM would censor it anyways.
I'm still waiting for Schiff's evidence. :lol:

We're not privy to all of the evidence. Sky knows this. If Sky watched the presser by the legal team, he knows what has been provided to us. He simply rejects it. I have no clue what the results of any of this will be. I am convinced it won't change the results.
 

SkylarkTempest

Active Member
That’s what investigations are for genius!! Gather evidence. If it’s there the may find it if not then oh well. It’s called due process and I guarantee damn tee you if the shoe was on the other foot and your boy Biden was questioning the vote totals you would be singing a different tune. So like I stated early on when this took of us let it play out. Let the courts decide, if they have the evidence it will surface, if not then the courts squash it and America moves on. My net even if they did find evidence the MSM would censor it anyways.
I'm for investigations. I'm just not going to come to conclusions before evidence is presented. If that's your position, then we agree. Right now, it's an open question. But, as of right now, there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
As far as widespread fraud, I'll wait until evidence is presented. I haven't seen any. Claims of "hundreds of affidavits" means nothing unless we know what's in them. I saw a woman on Fox Business the other day making claims of voter fraud because she saw food trucks that couldn't possibly hold enough food for the staff. I mean, if that is the kind of claims these affidavits are filled with, I think we can rest assured our electoral system is safe and secure, as DHS has claimed.
That's what we should do... wait for the evidence. You must not have watched the press conference by Giuliani and the rest of the legal team. Giuliani claims he has hundreds of sworn affidavits of voter fraud. Is he full of crap? Giuliani is one of the most prominent lawyers in this country. He hasn't made such success by bluffing and lying. I don't know, maybe he's gone nuts and thinks he can bluff his way through this. I happen to think he's smarter than that.
 

SkylarkTempest

Active Member
That's what we should do... wait for the evidence. You must not have watched the press conference by Giuliani and the rest of the legal team. Giuliani claims he has hundreds of sworn affidavits of voter fraud. Is he full of crap? Giuliani is one of the most prominent lawyers in this country. He hasn't made such success by bluffing and lying. I don't know, maybe he's gone nuts and thinks he can bluff his way through this. I happen to think he's smarter than that.
Well, like I said, the content of the affidavits is what matters. If they are credible and an investigation leads to the discovery of ballots illegally cast, then he isn't full of crap. I think we see eye to eye on this. But, as of this moment, there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Active Member
I was definitely for an investigation into Russian influence, as was a bipartisan group of lawmakers. Trump's own man, Rosenstein, was the one who appointed Mueller, and I have no reason to question the findings of the investigation. There is no doubt, on both sides of the aisle (and from our intelligence community), that Russia interfered with the election. Whether their influence had an effect is impossible to determine. Some people believe the suppression of information by Facebook and Google had an effect on the outcome of this election. If true, then I don't see why the infusion of Russian propaganda last election wouldn't have an effect, too. But again, it's impossible to know for sure.

As far as widespread fraud, I'll wait until evidence is presented. I haven't seen any. Claims of "hundreds of affidavits" means nothing unless we know what's in them. I saw a woman on Fox Business the other day making claims of voter fraud because she saw food trucks that couldn't possibly hold enough food for the staff. I mean, if that is the kind of claims these affidavits are filled with, I think we can rest assured our electoral system is safe and secure, as DHS has claimed.
I agree. Let’s wait and see. Only those involved know what evidence they do or don’t have. The media is feeding the narratives on both sides keeping everyone spooled up. As far as 2016 Russian interference goes I believe that it may have happened but trump colluding with them not so much. Millions of dollars were wasted on that investigation that could have provided health insurance for those that needed it without messing with my insurance. When they announced they were going to impeach trump before he was inaugurated you could very well bet it was all BS.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Active Member
Well, like I said, the content of the affidavits is what matters. If they are credible and an investigation leads to the discovery of ballots illegally cast, then he isn't full of crap. I think we see eye to eye on this. But, as of this moment, there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.
You have to admit mail in voting was a good opportunity for fraud. Once they tear off the signature portion there is no way to tell which way that person voted to change anything. States had 10 months to prepare for this and they failed. Federal elections process should be the same across all 50 states. There needs to be checks and balances.
 

SkylarkTempest

Active Member
As far as 2016 Russian interference goes I believe that it may have happened but trump colluding with them not so much.
Multiple intelligence agencies have determined that the Russians led a coordinated operation to interfere in the 2016 election.

Millions of dollars were wasted on that investigation that could have provided health insurance for those that needed it without messing with my insurance.
A bipartisan group of lawmakers called for the investigation into Russian interference and the special prosecutor was appointed by Trump's man Rosenstein. There was genuine concern at the time.

When they announced they were going to impeach trump before he was inaugurated you could very well bet it was all BS.
Who is "they"? I can't find information about that.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Active Member
Multiple intelligence agencies have determined that the Russians led a coordinated operation to interfere in the 2016 election.



A bipartisan group of lawmakers called for the investigation into Russian interference and the special prosecutor was appointed by Trump's man Rosenstein. There was genuine concern at the time.



Who is "they"? I can't find information about that.
MSM, newspaper’s, and even a few members of Congress said it. I distinctly remember watching the news and seeing the clip myself in 2016. Cannot recall which house member said it but it was said.
 
Top