Genesis 30 Scoundrel v Scoundrel!

seekeroftruth

Well-Known Member
Genesis 30:25 After Rachel gave birth to Joseph, Jacob said to Laban, “Send me on my way so I can go back to my own homeland. 26 Give me my wives and children, for whom I have served you, and I will be on my way. You know how much work I’ve done for you.”

27 But Laban said to him, “If I have found favor in your eyes, please stay. I have learned by divination that the Lord has blessed me because of you.” 28 He added, “Name your wages, and I will pay them.”

29 Jacob said to him, “You know how I have worked for you and how your livestock has fared under my care. 30 The little you had before I came has increased greatly, and the Lord has blessed you wherever I have been. But now, when may I do something for my own household?

31 “What shall I give you?” he asked.

“Don’t give me anything,” Jacob replied. “But if you will do this one thing for me, I will go on tending your flocks and watching over them: 32 Let me go through all your flocks today and remove from them every speckled or spotted sheep, every dark-colored lamb and every spotted or speckled goat. They will be my wages. 33 And my honesty will testify for me in the future, whenever you check on the wages you have paid me. Any goat in my possession that is not speckled or spotted, or any lamb that is not dark-colored, will be considered stolen.”

34 “Agreed,” said Laban. “Let it be as you have said.” 35 That same day he removed all the male goats that were streaked or spotted, and all the speckled or spotted female goats (all that had white on them) and all the dark-colored lambs, and he placed them in the care of his sons. 36 Then he put a three-day journey between himself and Jacob, while Jacob continued to tend the rest of Laban’s flocks.

37 Jacob, however, took fresh-cut branches from poplar, almond and plane trees and made white stripes on them by peeling the bark and exposing the white inner wood of the branches. 38 Then he placed the peeled branches in all the watering troughs, so that they would be directly in front of the flocks when they came to drink. When the flocks were in heat and came to drink, 39 they mated in front of the branches. And they bore young that were streaked or speckled or spotted. 40 Jacob set apart the young of the flock by themselves, but made the rest face the streaked and dark-colored animals that belonged to Laban. Thus he made separate flocks for himself and did not put them with Laban’s animals. 41 Whenever the stronger females were in heat, Jacob would place the branches in the troughs in front of the animals so they would mate near the branches, 42 but if the animals were weak, he would not place them there. So the weak animals went to Laban and the strong ones to Jacob. 43 In this way the man grew exceedingly prosperous and came to own large flocks, and female and male servants, and camels and donkeys.

Sorry, I know this is a long story. I figured on these long stories, it's better to highlight than to bold the whole thing. Two scoundrels trying to cheat each other, that reminds me of countless TV shows or movies! The Bible is full of these messed up people!

The commentaries are all over the place on these verses. I think the tree branches threw them off a bit.

There are three points to this story.
  1. Laban and Jacob are both greedy scoundrels - Each is interested in his own best interests. Laban knew that Jacob's labor made him rich. That's obvious. After all, why keep a man around for 14 years if he's not adding anything to the equation.
  2. Laban claims to know by an unexplained divination that Jacob is blessed by God. The Bible doesn't tell us that Laban is visited by an angel, and we've seen, in the past, that such experiences are normally documented. It also doesn't mention of magician or witch speaking to Laban, so that's not logical either. It seems that Laban might just be using his own experience and calling it divination. He is, after all, as big a scoundrel as Jacob.
  3. Jacob uses husbandry to mark the flocks for his profit. Those tree branches caused the commentaries much grief. The simple explanation is animal husbandry. I did find a commentary that agrees that husbandry is the key here. The problem is the placement of the wood. Here in the US [and other places around the world] when animals come into heat, they are separated. Those tree branches would make excellent breeding pens, right?

So I did find one commentary about the husbandry part of the verses. It comes from bible.org.

Now that Laban is prepared to accept a hard bargain, Jacob names his terms. And frankly, Laban must have breathed a sigh of relief, for the request was one that was easy to accept. Normally goats in that land were black or dark brown, seldom white or spotted with white. On the other hand, the sheep were nearly always white, infrequently black or spotted.251 Jacob offered to continue working as a tender of the flocks if he were but to receive the rarer of the offspring.

Jacob would examine the flocks that day, removing all the speckled and spotted animals, and these would be set aside as Laban’s property. These animals would be taken three days’ distance and kept by Laban’s sons. Only those newly born spotted or striped would become Jacob’s property. At some later time the herd would be examined, and the spotted or striped animals would go to Jacob, while the rest would be Laban’s. Removing the spotted and striped which were in the flock benefited Laban in two ways. First, it left these animals to him, not Jacob. Also, it lessened the chances of other spotted or striped animals being conceived, since these would not be mating with the flock.​

It was a kind of selective breeding. We are told that lambing took place twice during the year, once in the fall and once in the spring.252 Those born in the fall were thought to be hardier, since they must endure the harsh winter. Jacob placed his peeled poles only in front of the superior animals and not before the weaker. In Jacob’s mind the result was that the strong animals went to him, while the weak went to Laban​

From everything that has been said, we would naturally conclude that the great prosperity of Jacob was due to his shrewd techniques for manipulating the outcome of the mating of the flocks.​

Can you imagine just how much greater the flocks would have been if Jacob had been talking with God? We don't see him turning to God for answers yet. He's just as flawed as we are.... but he's part of the family that Jesus came from so he made it into the Bible.

:coffee:
 
Top