Great argument against National Endowment for the Arts

ylexot

Super Genius
Vince said:
I wonder if I brought my :flush: for display what they would give me? :confused:
Just remember to sign it first. Apparently that and an interesting name are all that is needed to be considered "art".
 

Tonio

Asperger's Poster Child
I would favor euthanasia for the NEA, only because what constitutes "art" is so subjective that there's no way the agency can please everyone. These days, too many artist-wannabees think that art just has to make a statement, and not speak emotionally to the viewer.
 

ylexot

Super Genius
Tonio said:
I would favor euthanasia for the NEA, only because what constitutes "art" is so subjective that there's no way the agency can please everyone. These days, too many artist-wannabees think that art just has to make a statement, and not speak emotionally to the viewer.
Exactly. Art needs to go back to the way it used to be. Art should be produced out of the passion of the artist, the commissioning by private sources, or a combination of both. The government needs to get out of the art business. However, I do support government museums for educating the public about established works of art.
 

ylexot

Super Genius
itsbob said:
I relaly HOPE this is a joke.. but knowing the endowment for the arts, it's probably true!
Well, it's not a joke, but it's not from the NEA either. It's just indicative of what "art experts" consider to be art.
 

Agee

Well-Known Member
The Louvre Baby, I'm headed to the Louvre!
 

Attachments

  • 0428.jpg
    0428.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 70

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
Reminds me of a "News of the Weird" story from the 90's, where an artist shoved different colors of kinds of paint up his azz and expelled them onto the canvas. At his exhibit, each piece was accompanied by a video demonstrating the creation of displayed item. Thus he was able to asert as he'd publicly stated previously "I can make better art with my azz" than some of his contemporaries.

I'm fully able to accept modern art as weird - I saw one piece at the Hirsschorn years ago that was nothing more than a cataloging of pieces of "stuff" found in the cushions of the couch, including human tissue and bits of stale crackers.

But this sounds like you dare not leave a half-eaten sandwich around at a show or someone will give it a blue ribbon.
 

Agee

Well-Known Member
SamSpade said:
stale crackers.

But this sounds like you dare not leave a half-eaten sandwich around at a show or someone will give it a blue ribbon.
An extra blue ribbon, if you can see the Virgin Mary on the sammich.
 

Llwynog

Thats Welsh for fox.
If someone were to use urinals or other everyday objects to creat a statue of a person, for example, I could see it as art. But an ordinary urinal is a urinal not art.

This one is over the top.
Hang Fung Gold Technology Group has come up with a bathroom that is a tough act to follow: a solid gold bathroom, complete with toilet, situated in Tsimshatsui. This bathroom has achieved two entries for the company in the Guinness Book of Records, as at a stroke it has produced both the world's most expensive bathroom and its most expensive toilet. At a total cost of more than HK$600 million (US$77 million), these 24-carat gold amenities are the last word in fantasy. Everything from toilet to mirror frame is gold, including the taps, the sink and the toilet-tissue holder. As a final touch the ceiling is encrusted with rubies, emeralds, pearls and sapphires.
 
Last edited:

Llwynog

Thats Welsh for fox.
Artist eats fox

Artist eats fox in protest
Performance artist Mark McGowan, who counts among his feats pushing a peanut along the road to Tony Blair (news - web sites)'s Downing street home with his nose, has eaten a fox, in protest at the public fixation with a government ban on fox hunting.

This is just sick sick sick! :barf: :bawl: :bawl: :bawl:

McGowan plans to repeat the performance at an exhibition in London's Docklands on December 15.
:bawl: :bawl: :bawl:
 
Top