Yooper
Up. Identified. Lase. Fire. On the way.
Maybe some hope for Maryland?
Please take the time to read the entirety of the article; both informative and entertaining. The judge KNOWS HIS CHIT!
Link: "BLOW STRUCK FOR CIVIL RIGHTS IN CALIFORNIA"
Here are two teasers to whet your appetite:
--- End of line (MCP)
Please take the time to read the entirety of the article; both informative and entertaining. The judge KNOWS HIS CHIT!
Link: "BLOW STRUCK FOR CIVIL RIGHTS IN CALIFORNIA"
Here are two teasers to whet your appetite:
Judge Benitez’s decision is closely reasoned and unsparing in its dismantling of the feeble evidentiary case made on behalf of the state. It is premised largely on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller.
...All Californians, like all citizens of the United States, have a fundamental Constitutional right to keep and bear common and dangerous arms.
***
In Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court provided a simple Second Amendment test in crystal clear language. It is a test that anyone can understand. The right to keep and bear arms is a right enjoyed by law-abiding citizens to have arms that are not unusual “in common use” “for lawful purposes like self-defense.”
***
It is a hardware test. Is the firearm hardware commonly owned? Is the hardware commonly owned by law-abiding citizens? Is the hardware owned by those citizens for lawful purposes? If the answers are “yes,” the test is over. The hardware is protected.
The opinion is sometimes entertaining, as when Judge Benitez rejects the argument that firearms with “large” magazines are dangerous:
Nothing in the Second Amendment makes lethality a factor to consider because a gun’s lethality, or dangerousness, is assumed. The Second Amendment does not exist to protect the right to bear down pillows and foam baseball bats. It protects guns and every gun is dangerous
--- End of line (MCP)