Midnightrider
Well-Known Member
You have a pretty simplistic understanding of how laws are written...Your claim is the NRA influenced CA gun control laws, so your evidence that the NRA influenced the CA law is to use MD law? Why don’t you just say you have nothing? Since you invoked MD law, can you show me where, at all, any decision made in SB-281 was influenced by the NRA? I seem to remember the NRA has several pending law-suits… Not a good evidence they were successful in influencing anything.
You answers in the past have been that they were intended to prevent the mentally ill from getting firearms. Are you now saying this is not the intent of these laws? If it isn’t to prevent criminals and the mentally ill from obtaining guns, what is the purpose of the the CA gun control laws?
Things in SB281 the NRA fought for and got:
You can still possess all mags
No gun confiscations
You can bequeath banned firearms to your family
HBARs
And that's just off the top of my head
The NRA my have lost the war but they won a bunch of battles in sb281. The NRA lobbyist was working overtime at the statehouse and did exact some influence over the law as written. Do yourself a favor and read up on it.
Last edited:

