Gun Nut Plans March On Washington

[Ken King]

In light of everything Obama has done, what did he mean by "fundamentally transform America"? I mean, when you consider that word 'fundamental' I think about what the fundamental document that defines all laws: the constitution.

:shrug:

Ask him, from what I have seen it was simply his goal of pulling the broadcast media/press and social media so far to the left that the GOP would cease to exist by never giving them a fair playground to compete.

 

[Ken King]

Does the constitution also say that taxes should be collected evenly?
why the progressive rates, why will I pay 10k in taxes a year for obamacare while someone in the inner city pays nothing?

and yes, obama is pushing for a revolution. and I dont agree with a single thing he has done.
he has ignored our immigration laws, he has brought lawsuits against states he has imposed a tax for a healthcare system that is destined to fail and bury the country.
he has failed to present a balanced budget.

so tell me, exactly what has he done that gives reason to respect him in any way?
I respect Hitler more, at least he was honest with his intentions.

Does it? I always thought that the 16th Amendment said "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration." Where does it mention this evenly?

While I may not like the man, what he stands for, what he has done or what he will do, he happens to be our President, rightfully elected, and thus I hold respect for the office he holds, nothing more, nothing less. You seem to have a unique ability to twist simple statements into a conspiracy of support that doesn't exist.

 

[itsrequired]

Judicial, and what happens when it becomes corrupted by Justices that think their lifetime experience is more compelling than what the constitution says?

At what point during the corruption of the Supreme Ct, is it justifiable to evoke the 2nd and not overtake the government, but restore it to what it should be.

because right now, the government is being corrupted from the inside.

When do your eyes open to that? how much damage, how many rights, how much wealth distribution will it take before its too much for you too?

What should the second amendment be in your view? No regulation at all? Anyone who chooses can own and carry any type of weapon, whether it be a firearm or weapon of mass destruction?

 

[itsrequired]

​

I feel this is a pretty simple concept, what does the bolded part mean to you?

And do you see the word 'except' in this amendment? As in '... shall not be infringe... except...'

So I'll ask you the same question. Is it your contention that there should be NO law in regards to firearm or weapon regulations? No regulation at all? Anyone who chooses can own and carry any type of weapon, whether it be a firearm or weapon of mass destruction?

 

[BadGirl]

So I'll ask you the same question. Is it your contention that there should be NO law in regards to firearm or weapon regulations? No regulation at all? Anyone who chooses can own and carry any type of weapon, whether it be a firearm or weapon of mass destruction?

Why does the US Government possess WMDs?

 

[bcp]

What should the second amendment be in your view? No regulation at all? Anyone who chooses can own and carry any type of weapon, whether it be a firearm or weapon of mass destruction?

We should have enough weapons of advanced technology to take our government back.
If the government plans to use nukes against the U.S population, then I certainly think the U.S population should have nukes to send back to them.

comes under the well regulated militia.

but, what does this have to do with me carrying a 9mm in Maryland? or anywhere else,
I should not have to get a license or submit to investigation, pay for insurance etc... to maintain a RIGHT under the constitution.

The conversation with you here gives insight as to which side you will stand with if and when it happens.

 

[itsrequired]

Why does the US Government possess WMDs?

To keep us from being annihilated from those other governments who possess WMDs.

Would you like to answer my questions now?

Are you one who also would contend that there should be NO law in regards to firearm or weapon regulations? No regulation at all? Anyone who chooses can own and carry any type of weapon, whether it be a firearm or weapon of mass destruction?

 

[itsrequired]

We should have enough weapons of advanced technology to take our government back.
If the government plans to use nukes against the U.S population, then I certainly think the U.S population should have nukes to send back to them.

comes under the well regulated militia.

but, what does this have to do with me carrying a 9mm in Maryland? or anywhere else,
I should not have to get a license or submit to investigation, pay for insurance etc... to maintain a RIGHT under the constitution.

The conversation with you here gives insight as to which side you will stand with if and when it happens.

So you would be all for that kid in Boston to have been able to purchase a nuke from Iran and possess it in Boston? After all, he was an American Citizen and is afforded all the rights under the constitution. What you are saying is there should be NO regulation when it comes to arms correct?

Or are you a reasonable person and believe that states should have reasonable regulations as the SCOTUS has stated it is not unconstitutional for states to pass reasonable regulations?

 

[bcp]

To keep us from being annihilated from those other governments who possess WMDs.

Would you like to answer my questions now?

Are you one who also would contend that there should be NO law in regards to firearm or weapon regulations? No regulation at all? Anyone who chooses can own and carry any type of weapon, whether it be a firearm or weapon of mass destruction?

Who decides what is and what is not acceptable?
because right now it looks like they are trying to ban anything that could be used to fight for the restoration of our country. And while doing this, the government is stockpiling ammo and ordering urban assault tanks.

sounds to me like they are getting ready to do something and dont want us to be able to defend ourselves.

And this is even greater reason to fight them, to hide and not register our assault weapons, not turn in weapons.

 

[itsrequired]

Who decides what is and what is not acceptable?
because right now it looks like they are trying to ban anything that could be used to fight for the restoration of our country. And while doing this, the government is stockpiling ammo and ordering urban assault tanks.

sounds to me like they are getting ready to do something and dont want us to be able to defend ourselves.

And this is even greater reason to fight them, to hide and not register our assault weapons, not turn in weapons.

I think the SCOTUS decides. Who do you think should decide what is and what is not acceptable?

 

[mamatutu]

so,,
you planning on being there?

Are you planning on being there?

 

[bcp]

Or are you a reasonable person and believe that states should have reasonable regulations as the SCOTUS has stated it is not unconstitutional for states to pass reasonable regulations?

again, who decides what is reasonable?
I no longer have faith in the SOCTUS, it is corrupt. The executive office is corrupt,
who decides?
and, why do you keep jumping to a nuclear weapon when in reality we are talking about handguns and rifles?
If I was going to kill someone, could I do it just as easy with my 9 as I could my AK? (hint, AK is not exactly an assault weapon)

They are banning based on looks, not ability.

Its coming, make sure you choose wise as far as the side you go with.

 

[itsrequired]

again, who decides what is reasonable?
I no longer have faith in the SOCTUS, it is corrupt. The executive office is corrupt,
who decides?
and, why do you keep jumping to a nuclear weapon when in reality we are talking about handguns and rifles?
If I was going to kill someone, could I do it just as easy with my 9 as I could my AK? (hint, AK is not exactly an assault weapon)

They are banning based on looks, not ability.

Its coming, make sure you choose wise as far as the side you go with.

I have been respectful and answered your questions. Answer mine. Do you believe there should be NO laws regarding the regulations of weapons?

 

[bcp]

I have been respectful and answered your questions. Answer mine. Do you believe there should be NO laws regarding the regulations of weapons?

I believe at this point, whatever the government has and is willing to use against us, we should have to use against them.

 

[itsrequired]

I believe at this point, whatever the government has and is willing to use against us, we should have to use against them.

Okay, but do you believe that there should be no laws regarding weapons? Do you believe, like bob believes that any person should be able to possess a gun anywhere? Should someone who is psychotic be able to possess a firearm?

Why are you afraid to answer the question. I get that you want to possess whatever weapons the government has, but that’s not the question. The question is do you believe that there should be NO law regarding the control of weapons in the United States?

 

[Bird Dog]

Yes

 

[itsrequired]

Yes

Yes to what?

 

[bcp]

Okay, but do you believe that there should be no laws regarding weapons? Do you believe, like bob believes that any person should be able to possess a gun anywhere? Should someone who is psychotic be able to possess a firearm?

Why are you afraid to answer the question. I get that you want to possess whatever weapons the government has, but that’s not the question. The question is do you believe that there should be NO law regarding the control of weapons in the United States?

If those laws meant to keep the psychotic from having a gun, restricts my rights, then I say, no laws. sooner or later things will work out on their own.
as it is, the psychotics and the felons and the drug abusers can get guns anyway, so any restriction passed is only going to affect those that are law abiding.
to answer your question, no restrictions.

Do you think obama should be allowed to carry a gun? I think he is psychotic, and that forces the question, who determines? the very government we are going to have to fight?
seems counter productive.
besides, when the poop hits the fan, those mental cases would be useful in sending in for suicide missions

 

[bcp]

Now its your turn.
whos side are you on
the side of the country, or the side of the obamas

 

[itsrequired]

If those laws meant to keep the psychotic from having a gun, restricts my rights, then I say, no laws. sooner or later things will work out on their own.
as it is, the psychotics and the felons and the drug abusers can get guns anyway, so any restriction passed is only going to affect those that are law abiding.
to answer your question, no restrictions.

Do you think obama should be allowed to carry a gun? I think he is psychotic, and that forces the question, who determines? the very government we are going to have to fight?
seems counter productive.
besides, when the poop hits the fan, those mental cases would be useful in sending in for suicide missions

Okay.