Holy Land trial third major setback for prosecutors

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
" DALLAS — The failure to win any convictions against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development was the third major setback for federal prosecutors after charging individuals in this country with providing aid to foreign terrorists.

_ In 2005, former college professor Sami Al-Arian was acquitted on eight counts of aiding the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. After a six-month trial, jurors deadlocked on nine other counts. Al-Arian pleaded guilty to one count of providing services to members of the terrorist group rather than face a retrial. He was sentenced last year to four years and nine months in prison and will be deported after serving the sentence."

Holy Land trial third major setback for prosecutors | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
 
R

RadioPatrol

Guest
Debbie Schlussel: Print This

Debbie Schlussel: Sadly, Another Schlussel Prediction Comes True: Holy Land Foundation HAMAS Financiers Acquitted, Yet Another "Justice" Dept. Failure

By Debbie Schlussel

**** SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATE ****

Don't say I didn't warn you about this. I predicted the Justice Department would lose their case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, the Muslim charity that financed HAMAS in concert with CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood, and virtually every mainstream American Islamic group. And, sadly, I was right.

This morning, the HLF defendants were acquitted on many charges, and on the rest the jury was not unanimous, which means a hung jury--yet another victory for these blantant terrorist financiers--three of the five defendants were acquitted of most of the charges against them. The judge declared a mistrial on those counts, but the fact that the majority of those jurors polled voted for acquittal says all we need to know. We lost, they won. And our "warriors" in the courtroom stink.


I've written repeatedly about Justice Department failures to successfully prosecute terrorists. They've lost the Sami Al-Arian case (another acquittal/DOJ loss I predicted), the Sami Omar Al-Hussayen case, the Mohammed Salah case, etc., etc., ad nauseam. All of these were incredible--but predictable--failures for the so-called domestic War on Terror. I say "so-called" not because I don't believe these are terrorists. They definitely are. I say "so-called" because the Justice Department only goes after these parties after years, decades have elapsed. And, even then, it does so only when its hand has been forced, and does so half-heartedly.

In this case, as in the Al-Arian case, the prosecutors threw in so much extraneous garbage into the case that confused jurors' eyes glazed over from a mostly-diluted, orginally strong case.

Further, the Holy Land Foundation and its employees and associates should have been prosecuted a decade ago, but they weren't because the government didn't want to do a damned thing. Then, it was Clinton at the White House. But even under Bush and Ashcroft, they went after the HLF only after FBI Special Agent Robert Wright--who'd been begging for this prosecution for years--went on ABC News and publicly expressed his disgust. Finally, after that, John Ashcroft decided to indict HLF and a few of its minions. But Agent Wright was persecuted, demoted, and nearly fired as a result.

Meanwhile, while the Holy Land Foundation defendants celebrate their tremendous victory over a limp, PC-dominated Justice Department, the man who won their single greatest post-9/11 victory against terrorists, Richard Convertino, continues to stand trial for daring to prosecute Al-Qaeda terrorists and actually win convictions against them.

When I wrote that the DoJ would lose this case, DoJ employee apologists posted dumb comments on this site claiming I didn't know what I was talking about and commenting on how hard the DoJ was working on this. Ha. Sadly, I knew exactly what I was talking about.

Yes, I predicted the Justice Department would lose, but you could have, too. Their win-loss record against terrorists is worse than that of the Detroit Lions. But in the NFL, it's not about the life and death of a nation.

America versus the Terrorists . . . Desperate But NOT Serious. For how much longer will we trust American lives--and the lives snuffed out by HAMAS--to these failures at the Justice Department?

This is Exhibit A for treating terrorists like a national security problem, not a criminal one. Exhibit A #2,309 out of so many others:

Because of the confusion, the judge has not officially accepted the three innocent verdicts, which acquitted charity fundraiser Mufid Abdulqader on all counts and two others on most counts: former chairman Mohammed El-Mezain and the group's New Jersey representative, Abdulrahman Odeh.

Regardless, they've won. And we lost. Yet again.

**** UPDATE: Reader M.T. makes a great point:

It is stunning that the US Attorney could not get a conviction in this case. After all, the US Attorney managed to secure the convictions of Border Patrol agents Campean and Ramos when they could not even link the recovered slug to any weapon, let alone that of the agents. The other irregularities in the testimony, evidence handling and the treatment of the "victim" by the US Atorney's office is staggering. See what can be done if you simply put your mind to it?

Exactly right.

Posted by Debbie on October 22, 2007 12:19 PM to Debbie Schlussel
 
R

RadioPatrol

Guest
Debbie Schlussel: Print This

Debbie Schlussel: Big Surprise: CAIR Gloats Over HLF Trial Acquittals, Mistrial

By Debbie Schlussel

I expected I'd get the CAIR e-mail gloating in my inbox over today's Holy Land Foundation trial verdicts. And, sure enough, I did. That was one of the reasons a victory in today's trial was so important. CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator, along with a host of other Islamic organizations that front for and support terrorism. And CAIR raised money for the Holy Land Foundation, despite loud "clues" that it was financing HAMAS "martyrs."

And with today's Justice Department loss, which I predicted, there is the highly audible cheering of Islamists--including CAIR--all over America, also very predictable. But as for CAIR's reaction, while I disagree that these were innocents--CAIR knows and we all know (but for the jury) that they were knowingly funding terrorism--I can't say I disagree with this excerpt of it. We lost, they won. And the consequences are deadly:
cairnewlogo.jpghamasemblem.jpg
CAIR: Council on American-HAMASic Relations
Gloats About Getting Away With Terrorist-Funding

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called today's declaration of a mistrial in the case against the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation (HLF) Muslim charity a "stunning defeat" for the prosecution.

CAIR also said the absence of a single guilty verdict on 197 charges brought by the prosecution in the terror financing trial will help reinforce the Muslim community's faith in America's system of justice.

The jury initially brought back "not guilty" verdicts on the government's most serious charges of material support for terrorism against the five HLF officials. However, jurors were deadlocked on other charges, forcing the judge to declare the mistrial.

The rest of their gloatation here (thanks to LGF).

Yes, it is a stunning defeat for good and right. And it does help reinforce Muslims' faith in our "justice" system, because no matter what, there won't be justice against them only for them and against us.

It is an incredible failure for those who tried this case. Though, they will hardly know it. They will move on to the next case, while more lives will be lost.

Taking bets: How long 'til the Holy Land for Relief and Development puts its shingle back up and once again opens for biz? Not long. Don't worry. If not under the HLF name, then reconstituted under another.

It's coming. And we're losing.

Posted by Debbie on October 22, 2007 06:59 PM to Debbie Schlussel
 

ImnoMensa

New Member
007 License to kill. Its the only way to handle terrorists. Unfortunately we dont have the stomach for it, while the terrorists do. We are fighting with one hand tied behind our backs and the other atrophied.
 

Warron

Member
The reason the government looses these cases so often is because they think they can just declare someone a terrorist and the person will be magically convicted. The whole concept that you need evidence is well beyond them.
 

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
The reason the government looses these cases so often is because they think they can just declare someone a terrorist and the person will be magically convicted. The whole concept that you need evidence is well beyond them.

This is just another huge waste of taxpayer's money.....

"I think it is a huge defeat for the government," said David Cole, a Georgetown University law professor specializing in 1st Amendment cases and terrorism prosecutions.

"They spent almost 15 years investigating this group, seized all their records and had extensive wiretapping and yet could not obtain a single conviction on charges of supporting a terrorist organization."

LA Times
 
Top