bcp
In My Opinion
you are starting to scare me.
Homosexual suing God?
- Thread starter foodcritic
- Start date
This_person
Well-Known Member
This_person
Well-Known Member
You should take me off of ignore, you'd see how wrong you are.
This_person
Well-Known Member
I agree. But, more accurately and not so far down the slippery slope - what about polygamy? What about incest with consent-aged siblings, or mother/son - father/daughter? How could either of these be left out of "marriage", if there's no standard by which to go?
While you respectfully disagree with me, does that mean you saw no validity in my arguments at all?
ItalianScallion
Harley Rider
God's definition is clearly a man & woman, leaving their parents and joining their souls & bodies and becoming one flesh (so to speak). (Genesis 2v24 and 1Corinthians 6v16).
And you're correct, it doesn't matter what I think (nor you for that matter) but it DOES matter what God thinks.
And, since furniture is mentioned in your marriage definition, what's to stop anyone from marrying anything, living or not?
Government (created by God) has every right to protect the people from evil, ungodly things. Pornography, child molesters, drugs, the gay agenda, murderers, etc. Why do you think we have the Police, CIA, FCC, DEA, etc?
I don't care what people do in their own private lives but giving sicko's the same right as normal people? Forget it! Obviously you're not a believer in God either. You'll fit in here very well.
Last edited:
T
tiny_dancer33
Guest
Incest with consent-aged siblings or children has the capacity to result in the production of offspring with the potential for physical and mental deformities or weaknesses. Also, one of the best arguments I've heard is that heterosexuality and homosexuality are both states of a relationship, whereas polygamy and incest are actions. Sorry, that sounds kind of confusing. What I mean is that an incestuous or even bestial relationship can be either het or homo. The actions of polygamy and incest can be described by either being straight or gay. Gay relationships should not be grouped with the actual action being performed, they should be considered a category alongside straight relationships. A hetero relationship cannot be homo. But a polygamous, incestuous, or bestial relationship can be homo or hetero. Homo and hetero are just classifications for the actions based purely on gender, not on the actual mechanics of the action being performed. Therefore I think it's unfair to group homo relationships with polygamous/incestuous/bestial acts. They aren't the same type of descriptor.
If that makes sense. =/
T
tiny_dancer33
Guest
The classic "I don't care what they do behind closed doors, but..." If you really didn't care you wouldn't worry about them getting to wear a little old ring on their finger and calling themselves the m-word.
Oh, and nahh, I just believe in them gay loving churches what actually loves their neighbor. Outrageous, I know.
P.S. Yeah, this couple of 51 years sure look like some sickos.
bcp
In My Opinion
after they get to call it married, how long before they push to be put on the affirmative action programs for their past mistreatments.
Ive personally had enough, they can go to the homo bars, go to the glory holes, rip each others colons out. but they can not be put on a level of equal and normal to a married couple.
foodcritic
New Member
Yes
Finally a rational thinking person....
I agree. But, more accurately and not so far down the slippery slope - what about polygamy? What about incest with consent-aged siblings, or mother/son - father/daughter? How could either of these be left out of "marriage", if there's no standard by which to go?While you respectfully disagree with me, does that mean you saw no validity in my arguments at all?
Finally a rational thinking person....
foodcritic
New Member
No ......YOU DONT MAKE ANY SENSE....You already seemed to realize that while you were writing this silly parcing of words and meanings!!!
"it all depends what the meaning of IS, IS" WJC
Funny how their rational when they agree with you.
Finally a rational thinking person....
bcp
In My Opinion
I think the only way to bring this issue to an end is by putting it on a ballet as a referendum to be voted on by all citizens.
Why can't it stand by itself? Why do you worry about future problems that may or may not surface, this is as bad as DC worrying about what if's now that the Heller ruling came down.I agree. But, more accurately and not so far down the slippery slope - what about polygamy? What about incest with consent-aged siblings, or mother/son - father/daughter? How could either of these be left out of "marriage", if there's no standard by which to go?While you respectfully disagree with me, does that mean you saw no validity in my arguments at all?
bcp
In My Opinion
history tells us that each advance to ones agenda leads to the next brick.
those looking for something will never be happy, they always want one more thing.
the slope will be run once started.
ItalianScallion
Harley Rider
Funny how we're all hate mongers when we DIS-AGREE with you. Time to wake up and see the light, Libs.
ItalianScallion
Harley Rider
You just don't get it do you? Behind closed doors they can put on whatever they want but their sickness is not to be recognized as normal marriage. GEEEZZZZ!
WOW! One couple lasted 51 years. What about the thousands that didn't?
bcp
In My Opinion
dont most only last 2 or 3 minutes in a public restroom?
cant find that in the hetero world so easy now can you?
ItalianScallion
Harley Rider
Thank you! This is why God set a standard but the Libs won't see it. First, it's the multiple spouses, then the many sex partners, then sex with animals, then same sex marrying, then child abuse (NAMBLA), then what? Dayum, you people are blind and stupid! This isn't futuristic, it's happening today and we need it to stop. Leviticus & Deuteronomy is full of sexual "no no's" for a reason! God saw what the world would turn into. That's why He gave us laws; to protect us from what we can't foresee.
This poor miserable homo wants to sue God. WHAT A FOOL! Let's see; I want to lie and God said I can't. I know, I'll sue Him. Can you see the depravity that his wrong choices have caused?
Xaquin44
New Member
um .... well when you're arguing that the majority (in this case both hetero and homosexuals) should have equal rights, and some people are against that because they don't like the homos, they are being hate mongers.Funny how we're all hate mongers when we DIS-AGREE with you. Time to wake up and see the light, Libs.