Hope Hicks refuses to answer questions at White House direction

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
This is not the behavior of innocent people. You guys cried and screamed when Hilary testified about Benghazi and Obama released all documents related to it.


Yet you are silent about this. Hypocrites

"Democrats said she wouldn’t answer questions as basic as where she sat in the West Wing or whether she told the truth to Mueller.


“We’re watching obstruction of justice in action,” said Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.).

“It’s a farce,” added Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who said Hicks at one point tried to answer a question about an episode involving former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski only to be cut off by the White House counsel."

 

Kyle

Just being a fly in the ointment...
PREMO Member
Awww... Did that mean old lady not say exactly what you wanted to say so you could get your impeachy-weachy started?

:poorbaby:
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
“We’re watching obstruction of justice in action,” said Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.).

:killingme

Alan Dershowitz: Trump 'perfectly entitled to invoke executive privilege'

Congressional lawmakers often claim presidents are not "above the law" in many of these cases, but Congress itself is also not "above the law," Dershowitz told host Laura Ingraham on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle."

"Each branch of the government has a form of executive privilege," Dershowitz said Wednesday night. "The president is perfectly entitled to invoke executive privilege. If they think it goes too far ... let the courts decide.
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
:killingme

Alan Dershowitz: Trump 'perfectly entitled to invoke executive privilege'

Congressional lawmakers often claim presidents are not "above the law" in many of these cases, but Congress itself is also not "above the law," Dershowitz told host Laura Ingraham on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle."

"Each branch of the government has a form of executive privilege," Dershowitz said Wednesday night. "The president is perfectly entitled to invoke executive privilege. If they think it goes too far ... let the courts decide.

You can't invoke executive privilege over someone who doesnt work for you Moron
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
DEMOCRATS AGREE WITH REPUBLICANS: HOPE HICKS' TESTIMONY REVEALED 'NOTHING NEW'



New Hope Hicks fiasco shows how dangerous a risk Democrats are taking

It’s true that the long-standing position of presidential administrations has been that close advisers have “absolute immunity” to congressional subpoenas to preserve presidential prerogatives. But in this case, the legal theory is being used as part of a comprehensive strategy of total resistance to oversight on just about every conceivable front.

What’s more, Hicks is a former adviser. The White House also asserted immunity when Trump leaned on former White House counsel Donald McGahn — who witnessed extensive potential criminal obstruction of justice — to defy a congressional subpoena and refuse to testify. McGahn agreed.

Democrats are now set to go to court to force McGahn’s testimony. And they are likely to do the same with Hicks.

But here’s the question: How long will that take?
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
Why do you defend the practice of not allowing us to know if our president instructed his underlings to break laws?
 

Kyle

Just being a fly in the ointment...
PREMO Member
Why do you defend the practice of not allowing us to know if our president instructed his underlings to break laws?
Executive Privilege is not breaking the law.

Invoking the 5th is not breaking the law.

Refusing to take part in Democrats Frame Job is not breaking the law.

Refusing to lie for Democrats is not breaking the law.


But you just go and keep that hope alive Nancy. :lmao:
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Why do you defend the practice of not allowing us to know if our president instructed his underlings to break laws?
Say Sappy ole girl..what exactly did Mueller's investigation turn up regarding "Russian Collusion" anyway?
 

Kyle

Just being a fly in the ointment...
PREMO Member
Say Sappy ole girl..what exactly did Mueller's investigation turn up regarding "Russian Collusion" anyway?
He's still busy huffing Redi-Whip and reading the tea leaves that prove Trump is a Russian. :roflmao:
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
If Trump was innocent wouldn't he want all his employees and underlings to shout it at every available opportunity not continue to block them from testifying? and block the release of the relevant documents?


Just admit you don't care it would be easier than making up lies as to why this behavior is acceptable
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
This is not the behavior of innocent people. You guys cried and screamed when Hilary testified about Benghazi and Obama released all documents related to it.
Who cried that she testified? We complained about lack of answering questions.

So, to not be a hypocrite yourself, you're saying it's fair to say Hillary and Obama and Holder, et al, were not behaving as innocent people, right? That's what you agree with - their actions were not the actions of innocent people when they refused to answer questions?
 

Sapidus

Well-Known Member
Who cried that she testified? We complained about lack of answering questions.

So, to not be a hypocrite yourself, you're saying it's fair to say Hillary and Obama and Holder, et al, were not behaving as innocent people, right? That's what you agree with - their actions were not the actions of innocent people when they refused to answer questions?

Show me where Hilarry refused to answer questions at the direction of Obama. I won't hold my breath.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
If Trump was innocent wouldn't he want all his employees and underlings to shout it at every available opportunity not continue to block them from testifying? and block the release of the relevant documents?


Just admit you don't care it would be easier than making up lies as to why this behavior is acceptable
And, if Hilary were innocent she wouldn't have used bleachbit and a hammer on her electronics, right? You're agreeing Hillary was likely guilty of crimes for her clear obstruction, right?

I mean, YOU are not a hypocrite, right?
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Show me where Hilarry refused to answer questions at the direction of Obama. I won't hold my breath.
Does it have to be proven it was at the direction of Obama, or could she be guilty all by herself for refusing to answer, or for hiding evidence, all on her own?
 
Top