It was not very long ago that courtesy towards women on the part of men—little things such as opening doors and offering seats—was regarded as natural and pleasant. Times changed, though, and such deference came to be seen as patronising and oppressive; an integral part of a patriarchal society. This was mildly annoying, but much worse was to come. In the 1980s, the expression ‘toxic masculinity’ was coined; surprisingly by men themselves. It emerged from the mythopoetic men's movement in the United States, with the suggestion that typical male traits such as seeking dominance, and success, combined with a drive for self-reliance and the suppression of emotions, could be damaging for both men and society as a whole. It was said that women were especially likely to be the victims of this supposed syndrome. This defective version of masculinity would inexorably lead, or so it was claimed, to domestic violence and rape. In a classic case of what one might not inaptly describe as ‘mission creep’, the problem then began to be identified as not merely ‘toxic’ masculinity, but masculinity itself. So it was that the rooting out of masculinity in male children came to be seen as a praiseworthy and desirable enterprise.
The phrase ‘Boys will be boys’ was seen as the essence of the problem. Boys who settled their differences with their fists in childhood and rejected the idea of crying as being unmanly were likely to grow up to be wife-beaters and rapists. A campaign began with the aim of banning this pernicious expression of juvenile masculinity entirely. There were of course those who asked that if boys were no longer to be boys, then what would they be? The answer, as we are now seeing from the veritable epidemic of transsexualism, is that boys will be girls; a healthier state of affairs all around, at least according to some.
The phrase ‘Boys will be boys’ was seen as the essence of the problem. Boys who settled their differences with their fists in childhood and rejected the idea of crying as being unmanly were likely to grow up to be wife-beaters and rapists. A campaign began with the aim of banning this pernicious expression of juvenile masculinity entirely. There were of course those who asked that if boys were no longer to be boys, then what would they be? The answer, as we are now seeing from the veritable epidemic of transsexualism, is that boys will be girls; a healthier state of affairs all around, at least according to some.
How Chivalry Came to Be Seen as Toxic Masculinity | Lotus Eaters
It was not very long ago that courtesy towards women on the part of men—little things such as opening doors and offering seats—was regarded as natural and pleasant. Times changed, though, and such deference came to be seen as patronisingidentified as not merely ‘toxic’ masculinity, but...
www.lotuseaters.com