I was not aware we are occupying Iraq. The last time I heard, their government was running the country.forestal said:When will your tolerence run out?
I think similarly everytime I hear cries of futility from the Left.RangerJohn said:Even with 230 years of representative government, we still don't have it all right, and to think that anyone could after 3 years is naive at best.
Sorry, reflex.RangerJohn said:The French?
MMDad said:We cannot repeat the failure of the Carter administration in Iran. He helped a dictator to be deposed, and then allowed, no encouraged, an Islamic Radical government to take power.
I believe we had justification to take out Sadam, but our biggest mistake is not having a plan to put a competent, non-radical government in power. We keep learning the lesson that the enemy you know is better then the enemy you don't know.
Since we started it, we have no choice but to finish it. We can either finish it by staying there until it is stable, or we can bail out, and finish it for the next 50 years, or however long it takes for the radical islamists to kill us all.
bcp said:help them rebuild, but do it with the profits gained from their selling us oil at a reduced price.
Dougstermd said:
I think we should stay until gas is 70 cents a gallon again
That was beautifulRangerJohn said:We have planted a seed in a dry, rocky, and inhospitable area...like the Joshua tree's of my native southern California, freedom and democracy will find the beginnings tough...but once rooted, will be strong and enduring. It won't be easy...but it is necessary. If we in the United States cannot help these people, then who can? The French?
Good post.RangerJohn said:It was a terribly mistaken belief that we could topple Saddam Hussein, imprison the Baathists, call for free elections on Tuesday, and then walk away. Sixty years after the end of WWII, we still maintain forces in Germany and Japan, fifty years later we still maintain forces in Korea, despite a "cease fire" agreement.
The people in the Middle East have no tradition of participatory democracy and have no reason to believe that people voted into power, would ever voluntarily give up that power based upon results of the ballot box. Even with 230 years of representative government, we still don't have it all right, and to think that anyone could after 3 years is naive at best.
It will be a long hard slog and the masses (lemmings) out there have a collective memory of about 3.2 nano-seconds. (give or take) Even Winston Churchill was voted out of office by a war-weary Britain after Hitler was defeated. Bill Clinton made a lot of politcal capital at the expense of George Bush 41 by remarking that "Saddam Hussein still had his job" but that countless American's had lost theirs. Our society wants "instant gratification" and unfortunately it does not exist.
I too, have spend much time in the Middle East; Bahrain, Kuwait, U.A.E. Oman, Qatar, and the Kingdom. In those countries, democracy is starting to bloom....people are aware that they would like a say in their own lives, and are beginning to understand the concept that government is there to serve them, and not the other way around.
We have planted a seed in a dry, rocky, and inhospitable area...like the Joshua tree's of my native southern California, freedom and democracy will find the beginnings tough...but once rooted, will be strong and enduring. It won't be easy...but it is necessary. If we in the United States cannot help these people, then who can? The French?
Ken King said:Good post.
forestal said:This might be an attainable goal if most of the population over there didn't hate us so much.
Our presence is the reason why there will be no peace until we leave. It is a destabilizing factor.
Also, we are risk losing the readiness of our military, if we haven't already lost it.
There is no military solution to the problems in Iraq.
Most of the population hates us? I thought it was just several thousand insurgents and local criminals that were the problem. Considering that there are 25 million or so Iraqis if what you claim was factual the 170,000 or so US troops would be hard pressed to counter such an imbalance and body bags would be coming home in the hundreds per day.forestal said:This might be an attainable goal if most of the population over there didn't hate us so much.
Our presence is the reason why there will be no peace until we leave. It is a destabilizing factor.
Also, we are risk losing the readiness of our military, if we haven't already lost it.
There is no military solution to the problems in Iraq.