How the cheaters cheat

[vraiblonde]

And it's not just the lying cheating POS Democrats:

Election Fraud 2.0! O.K., So What Are You Gonna Do About It? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Election Fraud 2.0!

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Voters registered in prison. People voting from homeless shelters – for 20 years. (Homeless shelters do not have 20-year residents, don’t email me about this). Active voters in a frat house who were 106 years old, and a voter who was 1,900 years old who registered to vote, just before the 2020 election.

The response from this Republican secretary of state was complete denial. No matter how crazy the phantom’s address was – like a jail – he refused to concede there was any phantom inhabitation of his state’s voter rolls.

At some point we have to ask why the Republicans are deep in cheating the candidates of their own party.

 

[Hijinx]

Only one answer. Vote on paper at the polls the day of the election, unless you are sick ,,lame, confined to a nursing home, or out of the country . If we want a fair and honest election mail-in ballots and early voting has got to go.

 

[SamSpade]

We've known about cheating in elections for about as long as anyone can remember. I can barely remember an election cycle where it wasn't claimed to have been the case in a presidential election, going back at least as far as Nixon and Kennedy. I remember the claims made in '76, in 2000, in '04, and of course 2016. I don't know why there's so much sudden outrage about 2020, since the losers in 2000, 2004 and 2016 - the actual presidential candidates - made a big deal about having been robbed in the election. Gore used to INTRODUCE himself with "I used to be President of the United States". Hillary has never regarded 2016 as anything but fraudulent.

But while ballot stuffing and other frauds in the past were possible by weak record keeping and paper ballots - it's almost incredible that in a time where virtually every private part of your life is not only widely known to corporations wanting to exploit it - where DNA evidence and facial recognition software can identify in seconds and web applications can track your movements, choices, orders, preferences and so on - - -

SOMEHOW we can't seem to properly verify voters. Cell towers and GPS can track a phone within feet of its location - but we can't tell if someone has voted already? I can get junk mail where they know the value of my home, my need for a loan, my credit record - and so forth -

But we can't tell if the voter rolls are accurate?

Do you realize they're STILL COUNTING in California? Every congressional district is designed to have the same number of voters - about half a million per district - so why should districts in so many states CANNOT seem to complete the job in a week? You realize in some states, the district areas are HUGE. Why should it be different in some states? Why should a district that covers half the state get it done in a night - and others many times smaller can't get it done in a week?

Securing elections and building up faith in them in the public's eye is vital to this nation. We should be more concerned about fairness in elections than making it easy to vote.

 

[glhs837]

We've known about cheating in elections for about as long as anyone can remember. I can barely remember an election cycle where it wasn't claimed to have been the case in a presidential election, going back at least as far as Nixon and Kennedy. I remember the claims made in '76, in 2000, in '04, and of course 2016. I don't know why there's so much sudden outrage about 2020, since the losers in 2000, 2004 and 2016 - the actual presidential candidates - made a big deal about having been robbed in the election. Gore used to INTRODUCE himself with "I used to be President of the United States". Hillary has never regarded 2016 as anything but fraudulent.

But while ballot stuffing and other frauds in the past were possible by weak record keeping and paper ballots - it's almost incredible that in a time where virtually every private part of your life is not only widely known to corporations wanting to exploit it - where DNA evidence and facial recognition software can identify in seconds and web applications can track your movements, choices, orders, preferences and so on - - -

SOMEHOW we can't seem to properly verify voters. Cell towers and GPS can track a phone within feet of its location - but we can't tell if someone has voted already? I can get junk mail where they know the value of my home, my need for a loan, my credit record - and so forth -

But we can't tell if the voter rolls are accurate?

Do you realize they're STILL COUNTING in California? Every congressional district is designed to have the same number of voters - about half a million per district - so why should districts in so many states CANNOT seem to complete the job in a week? You realize in some states, the district areas are HUGE. Why should it be different in some states? Why should a district that covers half the state get it done in a night - and others many times smaller can't get it done in a week?

Securing elections and building up faith in them in the public's eye is vital to this nation. We should be more concerned about fairness in elections than making it easy to vote.

Its not cant. Its don't want to.

 

[SamSpade]

Its not cant. Its don't want to.

I think that is partly true. The thing is, elections are held locally - and they're in charge of how they're processed. You can't have a federal means of counting local votes. And that means a local jurisdiction has to decide if it is worth spending the money. What can be CHEAPER than mailing out papers and picking them up in a box?

So, yeah, there's little WILL. I have to admit, whenever I read a case of election or voter fraud, it's almost always either Dems cheating in the general, or Dems cheating in the primary (or cheating to get INTO the primary, as was the case for how Obama got into the Illinois State Senate).