Check this story out. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6618911.stm
I happen to agree with the defendant in this case. What do you think?
I happen to agree with the defendant in this case. What do you think?
alex said:I happen to agree with the defendant in this case. What do you think?
Coventry17 said:I wonder why she even mentioned that she was traveling to England for the procedure, you know? Just go and do it. It reminds me of a situation a friend of mine in the Navy ran into a few years ago. He was transferring back to the States from Japan and was bringing his Japanese girlfriend with him to marry. He repeatedly told her, when you go through immigration you are here for a VISIT. A VISIT! Well, guess what she told immigration? "I'm here to marry my boyfriend". Duh. She was deported and it took her months to get a fiance visa to return.
Coventry17 said:I don't think anyone's trying to make a precedent or enact some sort of legislation over this one case. The law should be flexible enough to allow for common sense. She's not asking for Ireland to do anything; just wants to be allowed to fly somewhere on her own dime and do something that her gutless country won't allow.
That's why they're animals and we're civilized.forestal said:Heck, if she was in Iran the conservatives there probably would have stoned her to death.
Mikeinsmd said:That's why they're animals and we're civilized.
I do agree with your statement here, but where does the gutless part come in?Coventry17 said:I don't think anyone's trying to make a precedent or enact some sort of legislation over this one case. The law should be flexible enough to allow for common sense. She's not asking for Ireland to do anything; just wants to be allowed to fly somewhere on her own dime and do something that her gutless country won't allow.
terbear1225 said:you call yourself civilized when you openly admit you want to kill an entire ethnic/religious group based on the actions of a small percentage of that group?!
you really do need meds.
kom526 said:I do agree with your statement here, but where does the gutless part come in?