Is 'Sharing Food' a form of Expression?

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Homeless Advocates Are Taking Houston's Cruel Food-Sharing Ban to Court

The ordinance also establishes a citywide program intended to distinguish between "charitable food services" such as Food Not Bombs and "recognized charitable food service providers," the latter, favored group including only people or organizations that have "received a certificate from the city designating said individual or organization as being in good standing in the City of Houston Recognized Charitable Food Service Provider Program."

[clip]

I first wrote about both awful prohibitions on sharing food with those in need and Food Not Bombs in a 2011 blog post for Hit & Run (R.I.P.). In that case, Orlando's own cruel food-sharing ban had resulted in the arrest of several local Food Not Bombs members. I've written about such bans many times since, and described them all as "unconstitutional, discriminatory, and wrongheaded."

Randall L. Kallinen, a Houston civil rights lawyer who filed the lawsuit this week, shares that assessment.

"Sharing food is a form of expression protected by the Constitution," Kallinen wrote to me in an email this week. "Likewise, Jesus taught his followers to feed the poor and others. Why should a few downtown Houston landowners that contribute to Mayor [Sylvester] Turner's elections campaign dictate the law under which all Houstonians must live[?]"


How difficult is it to get the certificate ?

and it is always amusing when some Progressives drags Jesus into their argument
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
How difficult is it to get the certificate?
It's certainly reasonable for a group dedicating themselves to feeding the poor be somehow inspected to make sure they are safe for those poor people, lest the city be (reasonably) attacked by citizens for allowing unsafe practices on the city streets hurt those same poor people.

That doesn't stop corruption and graft, though. If there seems to be any kind of favoritism or undue restrictions on some groups compared with others, that should be investigated and the criminals punished.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
It's certainly reasonable for a group dedicating themselves to feeding the poor be somehow inspected to make sure they are safe for those poor people ......

I'm all for minimal governmental intrusion .... so I am a bit conflicted, but I agree ensuring the food is safe to consume

Maybe a few individuals with a county or 'kitchen license'

PG County calls them Food Service Facilities License ...
my wife opted to get one to work our daughters school kitchen when the 'primary' person was not able to make it.
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
I'm all for minimal governmental intrusion .... so I am a bit conflicted, but I agree ensuring the food is safe to consume

Maybe a few individuals with a county or 'kitchen license'

PG County calls them Food Service Facilities License ...
my wife opted to get one to work our daughters school kitchen when the 'primary' person was not able to make it.
I have a food safety certificate from the SMC health dept, and the soup kitchen is inspected. The certificate is now a requirement for everyone working there.

I asked the head of the inspection dept about the local food trucks around the county. They have to be linked to a brick-and-mortar location and are inspected when the brick-and-mortar is inspected. No stand-alone food trucks.
 
Top