dustin
UAIOE
link another link
So this is his defense? What I dont get is, if he has a history of speeding and blowing through stop signs, I dont see how the defense can say that he was speeding becuase his blood sugar was low? I can see them getting away with the stop sign thing, but not the speeding.
How is this any different if he had fallen alseep at the wheel and still hit the motoryclist? I forsee him getting away with involuntary manslaughter. There are always three sides to a story, the defense, the prosecution, and the truth....
Regardless I dont see him being involved with politics anymore and I hope the family of Randy Scott has some kind of closure to this tragedy.
So this is his defense? What I dont get is, if he has a history of speeding and blowing through stop signs, I dont see how the defense can say that he was speeding becuase his blood sugar was low? I can see them getting away with the stop sign thing, but not the speeding.
How is this any different if he had fallen alseep at the wheel and still hit the motoryclist? I forsee him getting away with involuntary manslaughter. There are always three sides to a story, the defense, the prosecution, and the truth....
Regardless I dont see him being involved with politics anymore and I hope the family of Randy Scott has some kind of closure to this tragedy.