B
Bruzilla
Guest
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/30/AR2005073000594_pf.html
Putting aside the fact that he's pulling a Dixie Chicks by criticizing America while on foreign soil, and being stupid enough to call on the US to be nicer to terrorists while in a country that just had two terrorist attacks (that's real smart), the following BS blurb really caught my attention:
"What has happened at Guantanamo Bay ... does not represent the will of the American people," Carter said Saturday. "I'm embarrassed about it, I think its wrong. I think it does give terrorists an unwarranted excuse to use the despicable means to hurt innocent people."
Unwarranted excuse? That's means that they're using an excuse that they're not entitled to. So, what is Carter trying to say? That Gitmo is not an excuse for attacks, or that they are? If he says the later, he's saying that the US is responsible for the attacks because of Gitmo (which doesn't explain all those pre-Gitmo/pre-Iraq attacks.)
What a loser!
Putting aside the fact that he's pulling a Dixie Chicks by criticizing America while on foreign soil, and being stupid enough to call on the US to be nicer to terrorists while in a country that just had two terrorist attacks (that's real smart), the following BS blurb really caught my attention:
"What has happened at Guantanamo Bay ... does not represent the will of the American people," Carter said Saturday. "I'm embarrassed about it, I think its wrong. I think it does give terrorists an unwarranted excuse to use the despicable means to hurt innocent people."
Unwarranted excuse? That's means that they're using an excuse that they're not entitled to. So, what is Carter trying to say? That Gitmo is not an excuse for attacks, or that they are? If he says the later, he's saying that the US is responsible for the attacks because of Gitmo (which doesn't explain all those pre-Gitmo/pre-Iraq attacks.)
What a loser!