Try reading the words and not listen to the voice in your head.Your comments sound defensive to me....just sayin'..
Try reading the words and not listen to the voice in your head.Your comments sound defensive to me....just sayin'..
If you really feel that way then why not contact the legislature and see if there is sufficient reason for her impeachment.
Try reading the words and not listen to the voice in your head.
It isn't my county either, nor am I in the 7th Judicial Circuit (Calvert, Charles, Prince George's & St. Mary's Counties).Even though it's not my county, maybe I will.....That's the smartest comment you have made thus far....congratulations....
Don't need to put you down when you seem adept at doing that all by yourself.awwwww....Is that all you can do now is put me down?
So what did the state recommend for his bond? Did they want him bound over for trial? If he was/is the threat that you consider him to be why didn't the state press for that? It seems that maybe your ire with the system should be with the State's Attorney.
Well that sucks, was Abrams the judge?State recommended he be held without bond. I was in court.
State recommended he be held without bond. I was in court.
The bond review was before a visiting judge in district court. After an indictement or criminal information, a circuit court as a rule would not increase the bond unless additional charges or information related to the defendant was presented.hmmmmm.....
The bond review was before a visiting judge in district court. After an indictement or criminal information, a circuit court as a rule would not increase the bond unless additional charges or information related to the defendant was presented.
Why does that suck?Well that sucks, was Abrams the judge?
Why does that suck?
Because the judge didn't agree with how the state desired the defendant to be handled.Why does that suck?
You really like to make sh!t up, don't you.Because he was blaming the States Attorney.....
Why would you make the assumption that the state would be at fault?Because the judge didn't agree with how the state desired the defendant to be handled.
You really like to make sh!t up, don't you.
Please start from the beginning and read what I wrote.Why would you make the assumption that the state would be at fault?
Because the judge didn't agree with how the state desired the defendant to be handled.
You really like to make sh!t up, don't you.
I think that it is first the commisioner's fault for giving him bail in the first place and then the States Attorney's fault for not requesting him to be held without bond when the case was transferred to the Circuit Court.
Please start from the beginning and read what I wrote.
and then the States Attorney's fault for not requesting him to be held without bond