Judge shopping.

limblips

Well-Known Member
We all know the left cherry picks the judges to present their case so the judge will issue a stay order for whatever thing the right is doing so I have an idea. Judges need to be graded by their successes (merit-based judging). If a judge has a percentage of his stays overturned, then he is removed from the bench (and possibly face legal action). These judges know when one of their rulings won't stand the appeals process, but they issue them to delay and muddle the issues. If they were to be held accountable for their wrong legal action they would be much less prone to issue BS orders. This should also apply to Attorney Generals (I am talking to you Letitia James).
 

Squiddie

Active Member
Couldn't an opposing influence overturn these rulings to sway that percentage indefinitely until they get a judge that bows to their interests?
It would just create more issues.
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
We all know the left cherry picks the judges to present their case so the judge will issue a stay order for whatever thing the right is doing so I have an idea. Judges need to be graded by their successes (merit-based judging). If a judge has a percentage of his stays overturned, then he is removed from the bench (and possibly face legal action). These judges know when one of their rulings won't stand the appeals process, but they issue them to delay and muddle the issues. If they were to be held accountable for their wrong legal action they would be much less prone to issue BS orders. This should also apply to Attorney Generals (I am talking to you Letitia James).
As long as we’re making up things we’d like to see, I’d like to see every piece of legislation coming out of congress to cite which part of the Constitution it falls under. That way when it comes in to question it’s easy to see if they did any research or just decided it sounds like a good idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

herb749

Well-Known Member
What Trump needs to do is end funding to these groups that are bringing the cases. They are receiving govt funds to survive. Let them provide their own money if they want to pay lawyers.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
What Trump needs to do is end funding to these groups that are bringing the cases. They are receiving govt funds to survive. Let them provide their own money if they want to pay lawyers.

Serious. I don't want to pay for that crap.

Freaking politicians, particularly the Democrat ones, are infuriating because they :blahblah: about"helping the American people", then they spend our money on bullshit politic games. That doesn't help me. It doesn't help anyone except the lawyers and the politicians.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

BOP

Well-Known Member
We all know the left cherry picks the judges to present their case so the judge will issue a stay order for whatever thing the right is doing so I have an idea. Judges need to be graded by their successes (merit-based judging). If a judge has a percentage of his stays overturned, then he is removed from the bench (and possibly face legal action). These judges know when one of their rulings won't stand the appeals process, but they issue them to delay and muddle the issues. If they were to be held accountable for their wrong legal action they would be much less prone to issue BS orders. This should also apply to Attorney Generals (I am talking to you Letitia James).
They should have sites like "Rate-my-Professor," only for judges.
 
Top