Kamala is a lying liar who lies

[vraiblonde]

When a Democrat gets busted out by CNN you know it's gotten out of control:

CNN Actually Did Its Job and Slammed Kamala for Lying About Trump

townhall.com

Not only does she lie about pretty much everything, the corporate media covers for her and doesn't challenge her on her lies. They KNOW she's a liar but they want her to win so they say nothing. Trump, however, can't say what he had for breakfast without getting "fact checked". These people "fact check" obvious satire and memes. If it weren't for the MSM enabling Democrats and lying themselves, Democrats would never get away with the lies they tell.

I've said repeatedly: the news media in this country needs a complete overhaul and a yanking of license for any of them who are clearly political operatives and not news purveyors, who push an agenda rather than impart information. They are the biggest problem in our country today and I will die on that hill.

 

[SamSpade]

I’m beginning to think the only way to deal with this is to take the journalist to court. Not the organization. The journalist. Something needs to be done to convince the purveyors of NEWS to tell - news.

(Saw something on Facebook that went something like - so they have legitimate fact checkers who tell the real answer? Why don’t they just broadcast it themselves? They could call it the news?)

 

[Ramp Guy]

When a Democrat gets busted out by CNN you know it's gotten out of control:

CNN Actually Did Its Job and Slammed Kamala for Lying About Trump

townhall.com

Not only does she lie about pretty much everything, the corporate media covers for her and doesn't challenge her on her lies. They KNOW she's a liar but they want her to win so they say nothing. Trump, however, can't say what he had for breakfast without getting "fact checked". These people "fact check" obvious satire and memes. If it weren't for the MSM enabling Democrats and lying themselves, Democrats would never get away with the lies they tell.

I've said repeatedly: the news media in this country needs a complete overhaul and a yanking of license for any of them who are clearly political operatives and not news purveyors, who push an agenda rather than impart information. They are the biggest problem in our country today and I will die on that hill.

As many have said so many times before.... "If it has a "D" after its name it is not a lie!" After 2 weeks of back and forth with video and audio, the claim will be "that it is just a mis-speak"

 

[vraiblonde]

I’m beginning to think the only way to deal with this is to take the journalist to court.

The "journalist" is doing the bidding of their network. They have their own bias and are scumbags for sure, but these networks have all kinds of oversight people who approve or kill stories. The TV talking head has very little control unless they're a pundit with an entertainment show - and even then they have to tread carefully to not piss off the bosses. Ask Tucker Carlson how that works.

David Muir and Lester Holt and Bret Baier and those people don't have creative control over their content. They can pitch a diva fit and refuse to cover a story, but they better be a big freaking star if they try to pull a move like that. They just read the news, they don't compile it or run down sources. They have show runners who tell them what stories they're going to cover and make sure the teleprompters are set up correctly.

Muir and whats her face were chosen by the power at ABC to moderate this debate, and they will not be fired or punished for doing what their bosses told them to do. And if you sue the network, they don't care. They'll just pay up and run off to find another lie they can tell to further their political agenda. CNN pays out settlement money all the time and it hasn't curbed their lies one bit.

Yellow journalism is as old as time. Our news sources have been lying to us since the day they were invented, and rarely are they punished. Look up the story of Randolph Hearst, Harry Anslinger, and "reefer madness". Look up yellow journalism and how these effers have started wars with their lies and manipulation.

The MSM is the biggest threat to our nation.

 

[SamSpade]

The "journalist" is doing the bidding of their network. They have their own bias and are scumbags for sure, but these networks have all kinds of oversight people who approve or kill stories. The TV talking head has very little control unless they're a pundit with an entertainment show - and even then they have to tread carefully to not piss off the bosses. Ask Tucker Carlson how that works.

David Muir and Lester Holt and Bret Baier and those people don't have creative control over their content. They can pitch a diva fit and refuse to cover a story, but they better be a big freaking star if they try to pull a move like that. They just read the news, they don't compile it or run down sources. They have show runners who tell them what stories they're going to cover and make sure the teleprompters are set up correctly.

Muir and whats her face were chosen by the power at ABC to moderate this debate, and they will not be fired or punished for doing what their bosses told them to do. And if you sue the network, they don't care. They'll just pay up and run off to find another lie they can tell to further their political agenda. CNN pays out settlement money all the time and it hasn't curbed their lies one bit.

Yellow journalism is as old as time. Our news sources have been lying to us since the day they were invented, and rarely are they punished. Look up the story of Randolph Hearst, Harry Anslinger, and "reefer madness". Look up yellow journalism and how these effers have started wars with their lies and manipulation.

The MSM is the biggest threat to our nation.

But if you sue CBS or ABC, it’s chump change at best. You’ve got to hurt the journalists so that they know THEY are vulnerable. They need to realize if they follow orders - do they take one for the team - or just tread a better path? If you knew it was YOUR career - would you do it, knowing the network would throw you under the bus rather than admit it was their idea?

People like Dan Rather are pretty much history - but he was near the end of his career anyway.

 

[Ramp Guy]

People like Dan Rather are pretty much history - but he was near the end of his career anyway.

He was just nothing but a conceded, self centered A-Hole...
Per Connie Chung's new book. A Washington Post article.

https://archive.is/1F8cg#selection-877.0-877.549

"Dan Rather, her CBS co-anchor for two interminable years? “Wound tight and had no sense of humor,” with “an inherent bias regarding women.” Rather instructed Chung to stop reporting and “just read the news on the teleprompter.” In the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, he was so enraged when she became the first CBS reporter on the ground that, according to correspondent Bernard Goldberg’s memoir, which Chung cites here, Rather “spent hours and hours on the phone with TV writers, blasting Connie Chung as a second-rate journalist.”

 

[SamSpade]

He was just nothing but a conceded self center A-Hole...
Per Connie Chung's new book. A Washington Post article.

https://archive.is/1F8cg#selection-877.0-877.549

"Dan Rather, her CBS co-anchor for two interminable years? “Wound tight and had no sense of humor,” with “an inherent bias regarding women.” Rather instructed Chung to stop reporting and “just read the news on the teleprompter.” In the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, he was so enraged when she became the first CBS reporter on the ground that, according to correspondent Bernard Goldberg’s memoir, which Chung cites here, Rather “spent hours and hours on the phone with TV writers, blasting Connie Chung as a second-rate journalist.”

Just saying, suing Dan over the Bush letter at that point wouldn't have hurt him - he was already gone.

I think the only way to re-acquire any sort of integrity in journalism is to return to the days where if you misreported the news - your boss would fire you. Well they're not going to do that now, partly because the network is TELLING them what lies to tell - and because if the "misreporting" falls towards their agenda - no consequences.

Well - if the journalist gets their ass sued, instead of the network - then the onus is on THEM for it. See, David Muir and Linsey Davis are NOT going to lose their jobs, and even if they do, their careers will go on. If you can't make the network be honest, you can put the fear of God into their employees.

 

[vraiblonde]

But if you sue CBS or ABC, it’s chump change at best. You’ve got to hurt the journalists so that they know THEY are vulnerable. They need to realize if they follow orders - do they take one for the team - or just tread a better path? If you knew it was YOUR career - would you do it, knowing the network would throw you under the bus rather than admit it was their idea?

I don't like the idea of taking out the minions..... I mean, I DO because, as you said, they should walk a better path...but for me it's the bosses who need to pay. And not with money, but with prison time. Of course if the liability is so high they can't get mouthpieces to present their lies....



Then I suppose you can get into the old "well who decides?" argument, but a lie is a lie. Typically lies can be revealed as such, especially when they edit footage to mislead the viewer. Bias is easily revealed, such as when the nets were fawning all over lying liar Cassidy Hutchinson and completely ignoring the SS agent who said the incident she testified about before Congress never happened. (That girl should be in prison right now, btw, considering she lied to Congress. If a Republican does that, they go to jail.)

If the media would report the news fairly and honestly, the American people could make informed decisions. Which is, of course, why Democrats are so vehemently against it.

 

[SamSpade]

If the media would report the news fairly and honestly, the American people could make informed decisions. Which is, of course, why Democrats are so vehemently against it.

Well - attacking the network is a nuisance - you can't hurt them enough to make them change. I mean, just about the only other thing I know of is. Elon just BUYS one of them.

But you can hurt the minions ENOUGH that NO ONE will want to be a minion.

 

[vraiblonde]

But you can hurt the minions ENOUGH that NO ONE will want to be a minion.

People do sh*t jobs all the time. You don't, and neither do I, but you can look at Tik Tok and see that there is no shortage of life's losers who will publicly humiliate themselves and open themselves up to liability in their desperate need to be famous. Heck, people commit murder to get their name in the papers. They know they could end up in prison or dead, but the lure of fame is enormous for some.

Take out the leaders, not the foot soldiers.

you can't hurt them enough to make them change

It can't be some piddly fine they'll make some rich overlord pay. It has to either bankrupt them for good or imprison them. Like I said, if it were up to me they'd be strapped to the chair. You'd only have to make an example of one of them for the rest to fall in line. That's pretty good ROI.

But since the rich and powerful are all in on it, and they all stick together, nothing will ever change.