SamSpade
Well-Known Member
I'm the same way, and for the same reasons. It's rare that being a Republican or Democrat has much relevance - at least to me - at the local level.Kerad said:For the smaller, more localized elections...I don't even consider party affiliation, unless given reason to. If it's a vote that I haven't studied up on at all (Sherriff, for instance...)...I won't cast a vote for that race.
I also won't vote for a referendum or question, if I really don't have much of a clue. I'd rather cast an intentional vote than just toss one out there.
Similarly, if an incumbent seems to be doing a good job the previous term, I give them a vote. I voted for Mikulski once, because she kept the local businesses from tearing down our security fence - by securing money for a nicer looking one. I also met her once - I think she came up to about my belly button. Next time around, probably not - I base my vote on each term in office, not their entire tenure.
I met Dyson yesterday while exiting my commuter bus - not sure about him. ALMOST everything he has done I would tend to support - but I have to admit, a few negative brochures have made me doubt. I'll probably pass, because I don't KNOW the negative issues well enough to vote against him.
Which is why I absolutely will vote for Ehrlich. I think he's done a good job. Being supportive of the President as a minus is the kind of thinking that cost Lieberman the primary - the birds of a feather kind of crap. O'Malley has to give me a compelling reason to *replace* Ehrlich. Tell me WHY *you're* better, because bottom line, I do tend to believe you ALL suck.Kerad said:One thing that always gets lost in these elcetions, is that all of America wants the best person in the job...doing the best they can. If "the wrong person" wins...deep down I hope he or she proves me wrong. Give me a reason to vote for them next time...not against them.
You realize that negative campaigning really only works when you just have two parties. You can base an entire media blitz around why the other guy sucks - and you win by default. Build a strong third and fourth party - and now you have to "win" votes by telling people why they should vote FOR you.






