@ Tilted ..... I think WM1953 is trying to say DOE Program was the same as GM and Chrysler Bailouts .....
I'm not sure they were trying to say it was the same, but on that particular point I'd have to let them speak for themselves.
That said, I think they make a fair point. Ford - like so many big businesses - doesn't have completely clean hands when it comes to being helped by the federal government. The government meddles in various markets to a much greater degree than I would have it do. For instance, it wants more fuel efficient vehicles (or vehicles that don't use petroleum) so it has programs that help businesses - in effect, subsidize them - toward that end. The loans that Ford received, at attractive rates, through the DOE program in question have a real value - a real subsidizing effect. I'd put it at something like $600 - $800 million over the 13 year life of the loans, but those figures are open to considerable debate.
Anyway, my point was just that those loans don't really change the point I was making. We certainly can criticize Ford for taking that kind of help if we're generally opposed to it (as coming from the federal government), but those loans aren't why Ford made it through the hard financial times and why it was able to deal with its legacy liability issues without declaring bankruptcy. And Ford didn't leave a lot of other parties screwed, while it itself was able to walk away from a lot of obligations, the way GM and Chrysler did. And the cost to taxpayers is far different.