Law and Order.

somd whisper

New Member
JPC said:
:lalala: There are no homeless children anywhere in the entire USA unless it is because of neglect or abuse by the custodial. And saying that there are "many children homeless" and only "eat free lunch from school" is just wrong. This statement quoted is a contradiction straight up. If parents are to take care of their own then let them do it. Saying that the parents must take care of their own by following the arbitrary and caprecious orders of child support is not doing it on their own. :lalala: You know it fails but keep the crooked destructive system anyway, and it can not be failing the way Cusick says it is failing because he just has to be wrong so the poster's egoes can long endure. :bigwhoop:


To tell me that there are no homeless children or children that are living at poverty level is crazy. You show me the stats on that.

Why is it the custodials parents fault?

I can sit here and argue with you all day and it would not make a difference, because you are so closed minded. All the proof that you believe you are bringing in here does nothing to support you stand.

Maybe if you could have some of your supporters come in here and explain to me in their own words why they support you I would get a clearer picture, you do after all have others supporting you and shouldn’t they be in here doing just that supporting you?

In the meantime here are some interesting sites that you may like to read

http://www.kintera.org/site/c.iuLZJdMOKpH/b.841645/k.57BA/Covenant_House_Needs_Your_Help_G.htm?msource=g

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:AzesjgGyUhcJ:www.nmha.org/homeless/childrenhomelessnessfacts.cfm+HOMELESS+CHILDREN&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:_QjzZVl6wPgJ:www.dss.virginia.gov/files/division/dcse/court_cases/legal_process/02whyischildsupportimportant-r.pdf+the+importance+of+paying+child+support&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1

http://www.clasp.org/publications/cfy-safetynet_final2.pdf

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:eH8DjycU35wJ:www.fathersforlife.org/divorce/chldrndiv.htm+non+child+support+impact+on+homeless+children+and&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:SLiPqtxk4WQJ:www.fathermag.com/news/1780-stats.shtml+90%+of+all+homeless+and+runaway+children+are+from+fatherless+homes.&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:_ssmDBDckCMJ:www.childrensjustice.org/fatherlessness2.htm+90%+of+all+homeless+and+runaway+children+are+from+fatherless+homes.&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=4

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/legacy/humres/106cong/5-18-00/5-18smit.htm
 

bdh802

Bob
is this JPC

somd whisper said:
To tell me that there are no homeless children or children that are living at poverty level is crazy. You show me the stats on that.

Why is it the custodials parents fault?

I can sit here and argue with you all day and it would not make a difference, because you are so closed minded. All the proof that you believe you are bringing in here does nothing to support you stand.

Maybe if you could have some of your supporters come in here and explain to me in their own words why they support you I would get a clearer picture, you do after all have others supporting you and shouldn’t they be in here doing just that supporting you?

In the meantime here are some interesting sites that you may like to read

http://www.kintera.org/site/c.iuLZJdMOKpH/b.841645/k.57BA/Covenant_House_Needs_Your_Help_G.htm?msource=g

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:AzesjgGyUhcJ:www.nmha.org/homeless/childrenhomelessnessfacts.cfm+HOMELESS+CHILDREN&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:_QjzZVl6wPgJ:www.dss.virginia.gov/files/division/dcse/court_cases/legal_process/02whyischildsupportimportant-r.pdf+the+importance+of+paying+child+support&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1

http://www.clasp.org/publications/cfy-safetynet_final2.pdf

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:eH8DjycU35wJ:www.fathersforlife.org/divorce/chldrndiv.htm+non+child+support+impact+on+homeless+children+and&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=5

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:SLiPqtxk4WQJ:www.fathermag.com/news/1780-stats.shtml+90%+of+all+homeless+and+runaway+children+are+from+fatherless+homes.&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:_ssmDBDckCMJ:www.childrensjustice.org/fatherlessness2.htm+90%+of+all+homeless+and+runaway+children+are+from+fatherless+homes.&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=4

http://waysandmeans.house.gov/legacy/humres/106cong/5-18-00/5-18smit.htm

I FOUND THIS PICTURE AND IT KINDA LOOKS LIKE JPC. CAN ANYONE CONFIRM?
 

Attachments

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
JPC said:
... do the english language as so do I...
Mr. Confused, I recall you mentioning that you would eventually like to return to the dating scene. And it just so happens the perfect woman came online earlier today.

May you live happily ever after on the government's tab. :yay:
 
R

residentofcre

Guest
That might be a very interesting study. Should we allow those who have cost the State of the County money due to vanadalism, vangrancy, or other degrees of crimes to run for public office?

Shouldn't there be a higher standard?

Just asking.... to get this law and order thread headed in a different way...

Should those who would be responsible for writing and passing our laws be held to a higher standard?
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
residentofcre said:
Should those who would be responsible for writing and passing our laws be held to a higher standard?
One would think so. :crazy:

What are the laws regarding political candidates, anyway? Supposedly you can't vote if you have a felony record - can you run for and hold public office?
 

somd whisper

New Member
vraiblonde said:
And while we're on an honesty kick, your ex-wife could have stopped the proceedings any time she wanted to. All she had to do was relinquish her child support and relieve you of any legal obligation.

She apparently did not do that. So the "unjust" court system prosecuted you at HER bequest because she obviously couldn't get any support out of you any other way.

IF you want to place blame for your deadbeat ways and subsequent incarceration, blame HER for wanting you to support your child, NOT the court system that was only doing what it is designed to do - UPHOLD THE LAW.

Ohhh wow that was amazing!
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
vraiblonde said:
One would think so. :crazy:

What are the laws regarding political candidates, anyway? Supposedly you can't vote if you have a felony record - can you run for and hold public office?
KK posted it earlier. If you can vote, you can run. Jimmyhat has no felonies, so he can vote.
 

bdh802

Bob
vraiblonde said:
One would think so. :crazy:

What are the laws regarding political candidates, anyway? Supposedly you can't vote if you have a felony record - can you run for and hold public office?
Marion Barry in DC comes to mind from years ago. He's such a POS. What a role model!
 
R

residentofcre

Guest
vraiblonde said:
One would think so. :crazy:

What are the laws regarding political candidates, anyway? Supposedly you can't vote if you have a felony record - can you run for and hold public office?

The way I read it... If you have the $25.00 filing fee you can run...
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
residentofcre said:
Shouldn't there be a higher standard?
This was brought up some time ago; Ken posted the current restrictions.

But, to actually answer the question: they (politicians) are held to the standard the people demand. Voters will get the official they deserve. If JPC were to be elected - with everyone fully aware of his past - and he creates disarray then it's sad but he did get there thanks to votes.

Of course, not everyone who was, say, a vandal 20 years ago is still a fathead loser like JPC. So how would you distinguish those who have reformed from those who have not, Becky?
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
JPC said:
but some day it will be God that strikes down those parenting police of child support and I only want to help HIM do it.
This is an interesting glimpse into your psychosis. You see yourself as acting on God's behalf, and you tie your success to God's will.

Is that why you feel justified in your dereliction in your own child support case? You feel that God struck down your ex because she would dare to bring the enforcement police down on you, and that meant God was on your side.

Ponder this: what if God was on her side, but was striking you down? What if he wanted you to pay the support you owed, and when you didn't, his will was that you go to jail? What if he was so displeased by your vandalism that he disabled you to the point that you cannot hold a paint can any more?

If you are going to tie your success to God's will, you have to tie your failures to god's will. Never forget that you failed as a husband, you failed as a father, and you failed to be a productive member of society. When you fail in the primary, remember to give credit where credit is due. God must not like you.
 

hvp05

Methodically disorganized
MMDad said:
You feel that God struck down your ex because she would dare to bring the enforcement police down on you...
Don't forget that she had the audacity to marry another man - which JPC sees as some form of adultery.

MMDad said:
Ponder this: what if God was on her side, but was striking you down? What if he wanted you to pay the support you owed, and when you didn't, his will was that you go to jail? What if he was so displeased by your vandalism that he disabled you to the point that you cannot hold a paint can any more?
:killingme Good point! And now "god" is forcing him to live many years being disabled, mentally ill, poor and lonely.
 

PrepH4U

New Member
JPC said:
:lalala: There are no homeless children anywhere in the entire USA unless it is because of neglect or abuse by the custodial. And saying that there are "many children homeless" and only "eat free lunch from school" is just wrong. :
What about the families still living in tents from Katrina? :shrug: Who's fault is that? There are many families homeless in the United States you really need to do some research before you spew your babble! You say you always back up your statements with links, would you provide the links to back up your statement please. :whistle:
 

Toxick

Splat
Too Hot 4u said:
Well was I right or was I right. I could not help but come in here and see this and show my friends. Ha Ha Ha


Sorry... who are you again?
And what is it that you think you're right about?
 

Too Hot 4u

New Member
JPC said:
:yeahthat: It is not a matter of popularity for me, but only a matter of right over wrong. So I am not really concerned if anyone likes me, but instead I want others to see the truth and agree with that, then we will do some thing to take the wrong and make it right.
:flowers:

You go little man, preach the word. Right always triumps over evil.

EVIL doers beware
 
Top