For your consideration ...
The property taxes on my old house in Connecticut are around 15k a year currently. It's criminal.
Did you know we are all slaves? While not slave farm hands, we are still slaves having our labor stolen from us. I'm sure you know, I'll expand further.
When a govement sells a bond; (a misnomer if there ever were one); takes out a loan to spend on whatever, all the real property in, let's say a County, is used as collateral. Now we all know that property cannot pay for anything, so it is the owner of the property that is the actual collateral. That collateral being one's labor, your productivity. Paid under an extortionist scheme. You don't pay, you are forced out of your home at the point of a gun, your property sold at a "tax" action, and purchased by someone that will pay.
Now how many actually consented to this theft of one's labor and production via a tax on one's home?
Here's, what is in part reads in a bond (loan) agreement:
"That for the purpose of paying interest on the Bonds and also for the purpose of paying the principal of the Bonds as and when they respectively mature and are payable, there is hereby assessed and levied and there shall hereafter be assessed, levied and collected in each year, so long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, an ad valorem tax on all property subject to taxation within said County sufficient in rate and amount (together with other moneys available therefor) to pay the interest on all of the Bonds then issued and outstanding as the same becomes due and payable and to pay the principal of the Bonds as the same shall respectively mature, and the full faith and credit and the unlimited taxing power of the County are hereby irrevocably pledged to the prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as and when the same respectively mature."
Also that having one's wages taxed is theft of personal property? Compensation in the form of money or any product of value in exchange for our labor becomes personal property. A wage is not income, nor earned income, (another intentional misnomer to add some sort of credibility to the theft of a person's wage.) Income from the beginning, even when the Constitution was drafted and ratified meant monies one received passively, (where no physical work or labor is done by the receiver), such as receiving interest from loans, dividend payments, rents, profit on the sale of stocks, etc.. Which is why at one point, "income taxes" were 95%. Having it set at 95% encouraged reinvestment of monies back into commerce for expansion, research and development, and innovations. Rather than the money being horded. It forced reinvestment back into the economy. Also, such "income" is simply representative of the production and labor of others. Government taxed "income" at such a high level so there wouldn't be such a dislocation of capital and to be held in the hands of a few.
smnewsnet.com
