Libs of TikTok - Deal
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
Tucker Carlson Trounces the WaPo Over 'Libs of Tik Tok' Doxxing as Only He Can, Reveals Disturbing Info
Many readers will recall that Fox News host Tucker Carlson was on the receiving end of some especially juvenile Mean Girl-style tweeting and “reporting” from supposed “journalists” and media hall monitors back in March 2021 when he had the nerve to call out “technology reporter” Taylor Lorenz, who back then worked for the New York Times, over her trying to have it both ways on the issue of online harassment of social media users, which apparently is Lorenz’s job.
In response to Carlson laying out inconvenient facts, the Usual Suspects including the NYT jumped into action at the time by accusing him of “misogyny” and then trotted out ridiculous “words are violence” arguments to defend themselves when they, too, were subjected to criticism.
Fast forward a little over a year later, and with Lorenz – who is now at the Washington Post – facing backlash again over her doxxing of the “Libs of Tik Tok” Twitter account just a few weeks after Lorenz herself did a tear-filled MSNBC interview where she decried the online harassment she says she’s been subjected to, Carlson understandably had thoughts he wanted to express about Lorenz, her employer, and the “former Twitter employee” (per Carlson) who the WaPo says helped “expose” the person behind LoTT.
During the lengthy segment, Carlson first highlighted several TikTok clips the LoTT account had shared on their Twitter page in the past as examples of radical left-wing messaging they were trying to warn people about, especially as it related to “woke” educators in public school classrooms who were openly sharing their indoctrination tactics on the popular video platform. Carlson also noted how wildly popular the account, which is run by a private citizen, had become. Because of that, he correctly pointed out that Twitter itself at times had punished LoTT by either suspending or shutting them down before the WaPo took action to try and punish/cancel them for the apparent crime of letting bat-crap crazy activists on the left speak for themselves.
WashPost Defends Doxxing Libs Of TikTok: 'Comports' With 'Professional Standards'
But in the rest of the statement, Barr spewed lies to cover for Lorenz’s disgusting style of muckraking. He falsely claimed the identity of the account holder “had become public knowledge on social media” before their report. “We did not publish or link to any detail about her personal life,” he added. This too was a massive LIE.
In addition to writing about how the user once lived in New York City and moved to Los Angeles, Lorenz noted the account holder was a real estate agent and a member of the Orthodox Jewish community. And she did, in fact, link to personal information before the paper was called out and silently deleted the link without an editor’s note or admission of guilt.
NewsBusters has confirmed (though we won’t share methods) that the link led to information tied to the user’s real estate license. The information included her full name, address, county, her employer, and her license number.
Right the Daily Dot did it 1st ... so WaPo is giving the DD cover and spreading the story wider and further
Now Lorentz friends are feeling the heat
German government funds 'research' project that doxxed Libs of Tik Tok
Brown is working on an ongoing project with support from Prototype Fund, an organization that provides financial support to Brown's so-called "Hatespeech-Tracker." Protoype Fund is a project of the Open Knowledge Foundation Germany, which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).
Brown's open-source project "cancel-culture" on GitHub shows a compilation of data he has gathered to track, stalk, dox, and harass targets he has a personal vendetta against, according to an anonymous Twitter user who shared a website link that exposes Brown's bullying, cyberstalking, and online harassment tactics.
Hatespeech-Tracker builds on several existing open-source projects Brown is maintaining, including the cancel-culture project which he defines as tools for Twitter archiving, indexing, and block list management.
"Eight months later and we now have an archive of 35 million deleted tweets, mostly from the far right and their allies..." Brown tweeted in September.
Brown explained that his scraper crawls its way through "right-wing grifter / bootlicker Twitter" through the Wayback Machine, which archives links.
Last edited:
Here Are 19 Reasons Why the Left Wants to Destroy the Libs of TikTok Twitter Account
The following tweets are the reasons why the Left, in this case the Washington Post, chose to dox — out — the previously unidentified person who runs the Twitter account called “LibsofTikTok.”
The article asserts that the LibsofTikTok account is “fueling the right’s outrage machine.” That’s the way the woman who wrote the article framed the issue, but the rest of humanity considers it a public service.
That wasn’t the point of the doxxing, however. After the Left’s “outrage machine” got LibsofTikTok suspended from the social media platform twice, WaPo decided to get to the bottom of the account, which features the Left’s own videos.
That’s right, the Left is upset that this account posts videos from the Left. They have gotten vewy, vewy angwy over watching themselves.
The bizarre and usually vile videos serve as cautionary tales for parents of public school children and others who wonder why it is that kids have to watch porn in the classroom (yes) or get special instruction from their teacher who identifies as a furry. Or why disgusting books featuring fellatio are prominently displayed in school libraries.
Chaya Raichik, a Jewish stay-at-home mother with a popular Instagram account, revealed several disturbing messages she’s received online from angry leftists mixing her up with the woman behind “Libs of TikTok.”
Raichik also blasted Lorenz in her Instagram stories for triggering the onslaught of hate, writing. “[Taylor Lorenz] this is ON YOU! You need to clarify that this is not me. People are posting and tweeting my parents’ home address!!!!!! If anything happens to my family it’s on you!”
The woman later revealed that she has an autistic sister who lives with her parents.
Raichik also blasted Lorenz in her Instagram stories for triggering the onslaught of hate, writing. “[Taylor Lorenz] this is ON YOU! You need to clarify that this is not me. People are posting and tweeting my parents’ home address!!!!!! If anything happens to my family it’s on you!”
The woman later revealed that she has an autistic sister who lives with her parents.
That's what I don't get - they're flipping out because LOTT shares videos of these freaks that they put on the internet, presumably to get likes and shares and attention. How is sharing their video that they made "hate speech"?
glhs837
Power with Control
I suppose because they only want positive vibes from inside the echo chamber.
The actions are not, but ANYTHING that makes progressives look bad - even repeating their own words are hate speech
[ of speech they disagree with ]
SamSpade
Well-Known Member
Me too. Now, doxxing is something I'm mildly ambivalent on, because when people DO that, they're publishing information that a couple Google searches would find - they're sharing PUBLIC information, albeit in a venue INTENDED to be used to intimidate.
But I don't get why these videos are NOT hate speech when a lib posts them, but suddenly are when they appear on another site.
The only point that comes close to making sense is that they're doing the essentially same thing as doxxing, but while it might be kind of MEAN - it's not hate speech. You can't have something be NOT hate speech HERE, but suddenly BECOME hate speech when it is posted elsewhere.
the information ' being ' there is one thing and some asshat publishing the information making someone's home addresses more readily findable for all the less initiated Violent AntiFA or Gay Mafia Types that are going to chase this person down '
Doxing = posting someones personal information - name, address, phone number, employer
Re-Postiong someones Tik Tok Video - Not Hate Speech .... Libs isn't offering editorializing or Opinions on the content Nothing but signal boosting their ignorance or the abject stupidity of their political position
Personally I do not see the actions as ' MEAN ' Either - Libs is only reposing someones own words - if some queer feels stupid after that, they should not be posting videos on Tik Tok
Taylor Lorenz's Vicious Doxxing of 'Libs of Tik Tok' Claims Yet Another Victim
Lorenz doxed LoTT and sicced a ton of people on her. She put this all in motion, not caring who she hurt in the process or what might happen to LoTT. Lorenz is not the victim here. Nor are the people on the left who posted their own public videos “victims” here either.
But LoTT isn’t the only victim here. Because of what the WaPo and Lorenz did, now another woman with the same name in Los Angeles is getting death threats and is being harassed by leftists.
“The Babylon Bee didn’t do a deal with her,” Dillon declared. “The Bee is a satire publication. You know, like the Washington Post. I did a deal with her personally. Also, I want to thank you for amplifying the voices you try to suppress. Your promotion of @libsoftiktok today has been priceless.”
I think I heard the boom he just dropped on her from here. Now, is that funny or what? Although I would differ slightly on the characterization of the Washington Post. Satire, like the Babylon Bee, is funny. The WaPo is a parody of a real news organization at this point, when they have 40-plus-year-old women like Lorenz acting like teenagers and putting out political hit pieces like this.
Dillon further explained that not only had LoTT’s followers jumped exponentially on Twitter, but that her email list had also jumped by thousands.
