Low-hanging fruit...........

cwo_ghwebb

No Use for Donk Twits
Antiwar organizer hates the troops, America


I'm beginning to think there's something in the water in Berkeley.

In his own words:
In the recent political battle around the Marine recruiting station in Berkeley there has been much confusion around the concept or slogan of “supporting the troops,” but opposing the unjust wars of the Bush regime. Many who oppose the Bush regime wars also say they “support the troops.” Let me say it straight out—I do not support the troops and neither should you. It is objectively impossible to support the troops of the imperialist military forces of the U.S. and at the same time oppose the wars in which they fight.

The United States has over 700 military bases or sites located in over 130 foreign countries. The hundreds of thousands of troops stationed in these countries are not there to preserve or foster freedom and democracy as the Bush regime would like to claim, but to maintain U.S. imperialist domination of the world. The United States now spends more on its military than all the other nations of the world combined. ….

We need to expose that those in the U.S. military are trained to be part of a “killing machine.” While not every member of the military is an individual murderer, they are all part of a system that commits war crimes, including aggressive wars, massacres, rape, and other crimes against humanity, all in the service of U.S. imperialism. The bottom line is that even if these people are relatives or friends, you can not support the troops without also supporting the objective role that these troops play in the imperialist system. …

But to decide whether U.S. troops deserve support you must analyze what they actually do in countries occupied by the U.S. The wars these troops are engaged in have the goal of maintaining and extending U.S. hegemony throughout the world. They are unjust, illegal, and immoral wars. Can you support the troops in these wars? Why is this any different from a German in World War II saying, “I oppose the wars launched by Hitler, but I support the troops of the German army which are making these wars possible.” When the Marines in Haditha massacred Iraqis, including women and children, would it have been correct to say I supported the Marines who killed those people, but not the massacre? This would be ridiculous, but no more so than supporting the troops engaged in the war that made the Haditha massacre possible in the first place.

The article debunks this loon with facts.

Socialist Antiwar organizer hates the troops, America
 

cwo_ghwebb

No Use for Donk Twits
Yeah this guys is a wacko ........ but do we really need as many troops in Europe anymore ? :howdy:

I agree with you. We could bring alot of our garrison troops home from a lot of places overseas.

As I see it, we've lost our mobilization ability. MSC is almost all commercial now. Technology helps in intelligence gathering and that can be centralized. Human intelligence is critical, but that's a function of the CIA. The biggest problem we have now is getting boots on the ground.
 
R

RadioPatrol

Guest
The biggest problem we have now is getting boots on the ground.


Lots of C17? is that the new Cargo Plane .... back in my day it was C141 Starliners .... or Contracted 747's ....... hehehe that was nice

Flying to Ft Irwin (well Norton AFB, then bussed out) .... a Commercial Airplane full guys with weapons ....... :lmao:


Didn't the AF also retire the C-5 Galaxy ??
 
Top