Maga couple charged with Hate Crime and Vandalism for attempting to paint over BLM

Crabcatcher79

Well-Known Member
Sadly these two didn't realize by painting over it with black paint they were just making it more visible.


A white man and a white woman who allegedly painted over a California community’s Black Lives Matter mural this weekend are each facing a hate crime charge, the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office said Tuesday.

David Nelson and Nicole Anderson are each charged with three misdemeanor counts, including violation of civil rights, vandalism, and possession of tools to commit vandalism or graffiti, the district attorney’s office said in a statement. The incident happened soon after the mural was painted in front of the courthouse in Martinez, California, on July 4.

“Keep this sht in f*king New York. This doesn’t happen in my town,” screeched Anderson as she struggled to cover the letters with a paint roller.

“Don’t you have something better to do, Becky?” said an onlooker.

“F**king Keep America Great Again that’s right,” said Nelson, responding to onlookers. “Why don’t you guys learn about history. The emancipation proclamation act. Yeah, that’s right, Abraham Lincoln. You’re only free because of our forefathers.”

 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
ah yes, freedom of expression is a Hate Crime


it was vandalism to paint the street in the 1st place
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
Hate crime, because everyone wants to be equal, but more equal than the next person.
 
Last edited:

Crabcatcher79

Well-Known Member
you make excuses because the action fits your politics

So who decides when to paint city streets? Whatever MAGAT feels like going and throwing down a bucket of paint?

Your position is idiotic and makes no sense. Much like your continued support for an incompetent.
 

GregV814

Well-Known Member
Crabbypatty, whoever told you to be yourself, gave you bad advice. Call the Slowkum Law Firm.
 

Crabcatcher79

Well-Known Member
yep, white people did it so they are guilty. Do you not understand that you are an idiot?
What don’t you understand about not having permission from the city to paint their streets?

What does that have to do with race of the accused?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
What don’t you understand about not having permission from the city to paint their streets?
Then ANYONE can paint a city street ....... blm rioters have no more special privileges than ANY OTHER AMERICAN

Once a street becomes a medium of communication for ONE Group, it is a MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION For ALL Groups

Equal Protection Under The Law

You Don't Really UNDERSTAND The Rule of Law and The Constitution
 

Crabcatcher79

Well-Known Member
Then ANYONE can paint a city street ....... blm rioters have no more special privileges than ANY OTHER AMERICAN

Once a street becomes a medium of communication for ONE Group, it is a MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION For ALL Groups

Equal Protection Under The Law

You Don't Really UNDERSTAND The Rule of Law and The Constitution

No. Tell that to the mayor. Who's decision it was not two yahoos with a can of paint cursing and screaming at people.
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
No. Tell that to the mayor. Who's decision it was not two yahoos with a can of paint cursing and screaming at people.
So the mayor decided their streets could be used as a form of protest..

The white couple said.. HEY GREAT.. we're going to go out and protest!!

White couple gets arrested because the mayor doesn't agree with what THEY were protesting..

Seems like the first Amendment has a litmus test.. DO you agree with them?? No? They have no 1st amendment rights.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Do you not understand the definition of vandalism?
Let me take a stab at it: Is all that grafiti you and your antifa buddies spray everywhere, vandalism? How about the destruction of public property by defacing monuments and toppling statues? Burning police cars? Busting out store windows and burning out buildings?...
 
Top