Man paid $20,000 in support for nonexistent child

Danzig

Well-Known Member
After Barreras was hauled into court, peppered with threats and demands for money for a child he adamantly denied fathering five years ago and even paid out $20,000 to support, his ex-wife was under a judge’s order to produce the child.

So last week, Viola Trevino picked up a 2-year-old girl and her grandmother off the street, promised them a trip to see Santa Claus and $50 and took the girl to court, alleging it was her daughter.

Barreras, 47, who says he had a vasectomy in 1998, said it was impossible . The couple had two adult children, a son and a daughter.

Trevino was ordered to bring in a birth certificate, but she did not.

It gets better ---> http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/7878.html
 
K

Kizzy

Guest
UFB :jet:

And to think, he has two other children with this women, what a horrible deception.
 

Elle

Happy Camper!
Kizzy said:
And to think, he has two other children with this women, what a horrible deception.
Her adult daughter was even fired from a hospital after she was caught attempting to create documents pertaining to the birth of a Stephanie Trevino , according to court records.

The whole family is quacked
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
That is such crap. What's going to happen to the judge that ordered payments for a non-existent kid?
 
K

Kizzy

Guest
Well, what is really stupid is the women takes a 2 year old into court, but the kid should have been 5.


Hello, Mc Fly. :dork:
 

Sharon

* * * * * * * * *
Staff member
PREMO Member
The elaborate ruse stretched over five years and involved fake DNA evidence, a forged Social Security number and birth and baptismal certificates

I'm sure she's still a good person. :yay:
 

Toxick

Splat
vraiblonde said:
That is such crap. What's going to happen to the judge that ordered payments for a non-existent kid?



He should pay restitution to his victim and/or be thrown off the bench on the grounds that he's to STUPID to be allowed hold sway over other people's lives.


And I think the judge should be the one to pay the restitution because we all know damn well that the ignorant biitch that got the 20 grand to begin with isn't going to pay it back, court order or no. She should just go straight to jail. Do not pass go, do not collect $20,000 dollars.
 

Makavide

Not too talkative
The sad part is, that this will probably result in new rules making it that much harder for those needing their child support payments, from dead beats, to get them.
 

sleuth

Livin' Like Thanksgivin'
Toxick said:
He should pay restitution to his victim and/or be thrown off the bench on the grounds that he's to STUPID to be allowed hold sway over other people's lives.


And I think the judge should be the one to pay the restitution because we all know damn well that the ignorant biitch that got the 20 grand to begin with isn't going to pay it back, court order or no. She should just go straight to jail. Do not pass go, do not collect $20,000 dollars.
Let's not forget interest. :yay:
 
Top