Massive pork bill passes

herb749

Well-Known Member
I've seen multiple stories about this. This one says $1.2T, Another says $1T and another says $500 billion. So which is it .? The $1T story lists what's in it that only adds up to $470 billion.

Now we know why the people don't trust the media .
 

limblips

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
"Massive pork bill passes"


Joe just tweeted that this bill will have wide-sweeping impacts on American's quality of life. He stated that the people will soon see lower pork prices in the stores which will show how the economy is growing under his leadership.
 

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
Not 1 middle class family will benefit from this disaster. Instead of costing us $0, it will probably exceed their modest cost estimate.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
If I may ...


How sad. It would be nice if the American people understood that this is OUR money they're spending. Money that WE work for and they just piss away like it's nothing.
And unfortunately, this is the fallacy most people think. It's NOT our money. It is the banks money. Which bank? Any bank. All banks. The Central Bank, (the FED). Since all currency, money, in circulation is the result of a loan, hence, the reason it's called debt money, the bankers own that currency. The United States does not issue it's own money anymore, since 1913 private international bankers took over that role. Therefore it is not our money. Even the money in your bank account is not your money, it belongs to banks, because somewhere along the line, banks lent out that money sitting in your account

What's being spent is YOUR labor, and your future labor, and your children and grandchildren's future labor, and mandatory taxes/fees, to pay back this currency created out of thin air and its requisite interest payments that suck more money out of the system when 'repaid' than that was created in the first place.

Our money? Too funny, that We the People, as a Sovereign Nation, don't own even our own currency. Let that sink in.
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
If I may ...


And unfortunately, this is the fallacy most people think. It's NOT our money. It is the banks money. Which bank? Any bank. All banks. The Central Bank, (the FED). Since all currency, money, in circulation is the result of a loan, hence, the reason it's called debt money, the bankers own that currency. The United States does not issue it's own money anymore, since 1913 private international bankers took over that role. Therefore it is not our money. Even the money in your bank account is not your money, it belongs to banks, because somewhere along the line, banks lent out that money sitting in your account

What's being spent is YOUR labor, and your future labor, and your children and grandchildren's future labor, and mandatory taxes/fees, to pay back this currency created out of thin air and its requisite interest payments that suck more money out of the system when 'repaid' than that was created in the first place.

Our money? Too funny, that We the People, as a Sovereign Nation, don't own even our own currency. Let that sink in.
Only the fiat money, if you have gold or silver coins those belong to you.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
If I may ...

Only the fiat money, if you have gold or silver coins those belong to you.
Yup.

For the class:

It's called specie money, which is defined as metallic money in all of its forms, gold or silver traditionally, but including nickel and copper as well. And why? Because it takes labor and time to mine, smelt, refine, pour, and coin. A true store of value for one's labor. Today, buying and taking possession of gold and silver coin, or ingots, is still a store of value. For it is not that gold and silver increase in value over time, it is the dollar losing value. Paper dollars and digital dollars can be created ad infinitum, whereas not so with a finite amount of gold and silver. Gold and silver coin are the banker's enemy because they show the effects that the expansion of the money supply has on the economy.

Today’s post ‘71 system of neo-plantation debt slavery is a modern counterfeiting operation, an unlimited, debt based currency, created by the banks, sold as loans, constantly debasing the existing supply, thereby debasing its purchasing power, as expressed in compounding price inflation of everything from stocks to soup. A currency pyramid scheme of created debts, each currency unit sold worthless than the previous one. As the debts accumulate around the necks of the nation, so the purchasing power of each currency unit falls. What cost $100 before, now costs $1000, the Nation becoming poorer in real terms as the cost of living soars. Only lenders, financiers, and speculators benefit, those who profit from the misery of others. Modern “growth” is a euphemism for more debt and debasement, more misery and suffering, as the banks and speculators invert language to present the steady removal of rights, freedoms and liberties, the implementation of neo-slavery, as freedom and human progress.

Banks, internationale, are the manipulators, in addition to working on, and pushing, "Building Back Better".
 

herb749

Well-Known Member
The media has taken their cue on promoting the 2nd pork bill. Articles are being written about how much your state will get and where it will go.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I can't wait to buy a car I have to give a blow job to, in order to run out to the store.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BOP

herb749

Well-Known Member
Did I hear from Biden's talk in Baltimore that their way of solving the supply problem was to lower the CDL license age from 21 to 18 .?

There's enough crazy driving truckers on highways to allow 18 yr olds a try.
 

PrchJrkr

Long Haired Country Boy
Ad Free Experience
Patron
Did I hear from Biden's talk in Baltimore that their way of solving the supply problem was to lower the CDL license age from 21 to 18 .?

There's enough crazy driving truckers on highways to allow 18 yr olds a try.
You've got to consider the source, bless his heart.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
At 18, they can vote, they can die serving their country, and they should be allowed to drink a beer if they want to.
I don't have a problem with 18 year old's driving trucks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

herb749

Well-Known Member
At 18, they can vote, they can die serving their country, and they should be allowed to drink a beer if they want to.
I don't have a problem with 18 year old's driving trucks.

I only see it as a stop gap measure just to make people think he's doing something about it . His problem will be getting some to do it, and how long it will take them to train and be ready.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I only see it as a stop gap measure just to make people think he's doing something about it . His problem will be getting some to do it, and how long it will take them to train and be ready.

You are right of course, but then eventually it will put more drivers on the road.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
You are right of course, but then eventually it will put more drivers on the road.
That raises a great point that I see little discussion of in Washington DC...the severe congestion on key transportation routes. More than a decade ago, Congress and MARAD/DoT started working on ways to improve/streamline/grow the "maritime highway" system. Smaller and more numerous ports to facilitate container handling that is now concentrated in a few larger ports, specialized high speed modular container-carrying vessels - "Sea trains":..that would move containers up and down the East coast to the smaller feeder ports to offload I-95 truck traffic, well-designed transportation "nodes" where truck, rail, air and sea transport modes would intersect and be supported efficiently. etc etc...

Congress passed a "Marine Highways" bill and started the initial studies with some very measly funding levels and never followed up any of it after that.
 
Last edited:

herb749

Well-Known Member
That raises a great point that I see little discussion of in Washington DC...the severe congestion on key transportation routes. More than a decade ago, Congress and MARAD/DoT started working on ways to improve/streamline/grow the "maritime highway" system. Smaller and more numerous ports to facilitate container handling that is now concentrated in a few larger ports, specialized high speed modular container-carrying vessels - "Sea trains":..that would move containers up and down the East coast to the smaller feeder ports to offload I-95 truck traffic, well-designed transportation "nodes" where truck, rail, air and sea transport modes would intersect and be supported efficiently. etc etc...

Congress passed a "Marine Highways" bill and started the initial studies with some very measly funding levels and never followed up any of it after that.


The unions will get very upset if these ships started using smaller ports where they couldn't control everything.
 
Top