Imagine is all one needs to do. He's convicted of being a liar to Congress
Is that a cemetary?If he was saying this crap in Congress about the Clinton's his next address would be Ft. Marcy.
Is that a cemetary?
Lying is lying, right?You mean he was convicted of lying to Congress when he said that Trump was a great guy and boss and did nothing wrong.
Hoo boy.
Lying is lying, right?
All we know is that he is willing to lie for money or prestige. Given that, why should we believe a single word he said yesterday?
But, more importantly, he didn't say anything of consequence, because every charge or bad-mouth was based on opinion and not a bit of it was based on verifiable fact. As Vrai pointed out, even Debbie Shultz asked him if we should believe him and he said no.
Generally, when incarcerated persons have info to share on some crimes, they are generally not believed just because their word is their bond. The info is checked out and, if appropriate, law enforcement acts on it. It's no different here. These things may not be verifiable fact by civilians using open sources of information, but they are certainly verifiable, or able to be debunked. I'll wait for more info.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "How can we corroborate what you're saying?"
Cohen: "I don't know."
Again, he didn't lie. They asked him what he "knew", and he said, "nothing, but I have my suspicions."Or, are you saying he should face a 2nd charge for lying to Congress? To what information do you have access to know either way?
Again, he didn't lie. They asked him what he "knew", and he said, "nothing, but I have my suspicions."
That's what testimony in the world of Rep Cummings looks like.
What do you think of testimony in the world of those members of Congress???
So, you don't believe Cohen?Kinda reminds me of Donald - peas in a pod.
Why else would anyone hire such a slimy lawyer?Kinda reminds me of Donald - peas in a pod.
Why else would anyone hire such a slimy lawyer?
So, you believe or don't believe Cohen?Donald hire Science - now that's funny.
Yes and no.Is that a cemetary?
The info is checked out and, if appropriate, law enforcement acts on it. It's no different here. These things may not be verifiable fact by civilians using open sources of information, but they are certainly verifiable, or able to be debunked.
Why do you despise successful, wealthy people?Kinda reminds me of Donald - peas in a pod.
Maybe he can hire Science and Kirk!