Michael Cohen written statement.

TCROW

TCROW

Well-Known Member
My favorite part is the bit about the proxy buyer (who was reimbursed from the Trump Foundation) for the art of Trump’s portrait.

Even better is that the jig was up back in 2013 when this happened.

What an egomaniac! Sad!

 
littlelady

littlelady

God bless the USA
BOP said:
Is that a cemetary?
Click to expand...

But, it really is not funny, sha, but I get it. This Congressional hearing is because libprog leapfrogs got outed. They are scrambling, and not doing a very good job at it; so to speak. God bless the USA. :patriot:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BOP
Kyle

Kyle

ULTRA-F###ING-MAGA!
PREMO Member
135299
 
This_person

This_person

Well-Known Member
TCROW said:
You mean he was convicted of lying to Congress when he said that Trump was a great guy and boss and did nothing wrong.

Hoo boy.
Click to expand...
Lying is lying, right?

All we know is that he is willing to lie for money or prestige. Given that, why should we believe a single word he said yesterday?

But, more importantly, he didn't say anything of consequence, because every charge or bad-mouth was based on opinion and not a bit of it was based on verifiable fact. As Vrai pointed out, even Debbie Shultz asked him if we should believe him and he said no.
 
TCROW

TCROW

Well-Known Member
This_person said:
Lying is lying, right?

All we know is that he is willing to lie for money or prestige. Given that, why should we believe a single word he said yesterday?

But, more importantly, he didn't say anything of consequence, because every charge or bad-mouth was based on opinion and not a bit of it was based on verifiable fact. As Vrai pointed out, even Debbie Shultz asked him if we should believe him and he said no.
Click to expand...

Generally, when incarcerated persons have info to share on some crimes, they are generally not believed just because their word is their bond. The info is checked out and, if appropriate, law enforcement acts on it. It's no different here. These things may not be verifiable fact by civilians using open sources of information, but they are certainly verifiable, or able to be debunked. I'll wait for more info.

Or, are you saying he should face a 2nd charge for lying to Congress? To what information do you have access to know either way?
 
This_person

This_person

Well-Known Member
TCROW said:
Generally, when incarcerated persons have info to share on some crimes, they are generally not believed just because their word is their bond. The info is checked out and, if appropriate, law enforcement acts on it. It's no different here. These things may not be verifiable fact by civilians using open sources of information, but they are certainly verifiable, or able to be debunked. I'll wait for more info.
Click to expand...

vraiblonde said:
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "How can we corroborate what you're saying?"

Cohen: "I don't know."

:roflmao:
Click to expand...
🤷

Or, are you saying he should face a 2nd charge for lying to Congress? To what information do you have access to know either way?
Click to expand...
Again, he didn't lie. They asked him what he "knew", and he said, "nothing, but I have my suspicions."

That's what testimony in the world of Rep Cummings looks like.
 
T

transporter

Well-Known Member
This_person said:
​
​
🤷


Again, he didn't lie. They asked him what he "knew", and he said, "nothing, but I have my suspicions."

That's what testimony in the world of Rep Cummings looks like.
Click to expand...

If I may...

So the original sessions in which Cohen lied...the ones in which of these people lied to Congress or simply refused to answer direct questions-despite having no legal standing upon which they could choose not to answer....and the committee chair or committee members just moved on.

ALL those sessions were run by REPUBLICAN committee chairmen! What do you think of testimony in the world of those members of Congress???
 
Monello

Monello

Smarter than the average bear
PREMO Member
TCROW said:
The info is checked out and, if appropriate, law enforcement acts on it. It's no different here. These things may not be verifiable fact by civilians using open sources of information, but they are certainly verifiable, or able to be debunked.
Click to expand...

Sort of like Blasy-Ford's Kavanaugh confirmation testimony. They took time to inverview the people she said were there and they all had no recollection of those events taking place. Funny but I missed the part where she was charged with lying. Or the other 2 women who also made claims against him ever being criminally punished in any way. Dozens of rape parties with dozens of participants, it should be easy to find at least 1 witness to that crime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top