Dakota
~~~~~~~
http://eagnews.org/michelle-os-healthy-lunches-going-to-the-pigs-literally/
I guess the bright side is more bacon.
I guess the bright side is more bacon.
"We throw away a ton of food"....
It's a bit like horses I guess.
You can lead a child to healthy food, but you can't make them eat it.
Actually I would have thought the kids would eat the fruit and toss away the garbage they serve as an entree'.
None of this is new - kids have been throwing away their school lunch for at least 45 years (which is my period of personal observation). Nice, though, that the food is being repurposed instead of just wasted.
When I was younger and my mother was alive, she only made us baked chicken or fish sticks for dinner but more often than not, we had baked chicken. Sometimes we got a side to go with our fish sticks or baked chicken but most often we did not. And when we did get a side, it was stewed tomatoes which, even to this day, I'd rather eat dog crap vs. wet soggy bread and tomatoes or carrots (which made me happy but my sister, not so much).
We never had anything sweet in the house so we would put butter and sugar on bread and lightly toast it in the oven.
So when I was growing up, my sister and I loved school lunches.
The problem with fruit is that many people on a budget will buy cheaper foods, canned veggies vs. expensive fruits and fresh veggies. Many children are not exposed early on to healthy eating. For my sisters and I, it came much later when we got older.
Was that all she knew how to cook? Or were you poor?
I had a wicked stepmom....all I got every day was a cheese sandwich..
One time an Aunt and Uncle came to visit, and so there was a plate of fried chicken in the fridge. I was so hungry I ate all of it. When it was discovered missing my Aunt took the blame.
You know.... they want us to save the enviroment and using food that is tossed away for another purpose seems like a perfect start.
However, "they" don't want us eating beef, pork and other wholesome foods because the so-called 'carbon footprint' on these foods is causing the earth to burn up from climate change. "They" would prefer we die in a fire and reduce the population so 'they' can enjoy all that green. In the interim, 'they' would prefer we take that uneaten food and give it to the homeless (and why not just give the homeless our homes while we're at it?)
Who is "they"? That handful of nutters whom we should be ignoring and not giving legitimacy? Why give a damn about what some tiny little group of fringers think? They are not a threat to you.
Who is "they"? That handful of nutters whom we should be ignoring and not giving legitimacy? Why give a damn about what some tiny little group of fringers think? They are not a threat to you.
You obviously haven't been listening to NPR lately.
Through the omnipotent forces of entities like FDA, DoE and EPA..."they" most certainly are legitimate and "they" most certainly are in control of more and more every year that passes.
http://eagnews.org/michelle-os-healthy-lunches-going-to-the-pigs-literally/
I guess the bright side is more bacon.
Who is "they"? That handful of nutters whom we should be ignoring and not giving legitimacy? Why give a damn about what some tiny little group of fringers think? They are not a threat to you.
Another thing I find incredibly amusing about the right -- fighting AGAINST people eating healthier school lunches ..
One again...you miss the main point: What I and many others (not including you..I get that) actually oppose is the ever-expanding control and overreach of the Federal government. In whatever forms it takes.