R
RadioPatrol
Guest
leaked if you care .........
I know Clevalley - you probably already have it
I know Clevalley - you probably already have it
dn0121
New Member
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320))
its nothing special, anyone can paint an old car and try to sell it as new. pcs really won't change, I guess need to change until someone builds something new. xp and any pc from the last 5 years does everything 90% of all users need.
its nothing special, anyone can paint an old car and try to sell it as new. pcs really won't change, I guess need to change until someone builds something new. xp and any pc from the last 5 years does everything 90% of all users need.
B
Beaver-Cleaver
Guest
No. Windows 2000 and Windows XP SP2 are good operating systems. Build off those. :shrug:
Beta84
They're out to get us
Are you kidding? They'd destroy their market. It's already bad enough that alot of programs compatible with XP and earlier aren't compatible with Vista, but they're working on correcting that mistake. COMPATIBILITY is why they are ahead of Apple. If they threw everything away then eventually their old stuff would be gone and every company would be "up for grabs" on whether they put their stuff on Microsoft or Apple. Microsoft would lose that battle based on the current trend. Ouch...unless they made an absolutely outstanding OS, that could be the death of Microsoft. Holy crap.
Never gonna happen.
G1G4
Find em Hot, Leave em Wet
What more could you really do with a computer, in terms of software & operating systems? Microsoft pretty much hit everything. The thing that Microsoft has better than everyone else is accessibility. Windows (be it XP or Vista) is so diverse and dynamic, that someone just starting out can point and click and master Windows in a few hours. The Windows core file is so deep that advanced users can spend all their time on Windows, and still not figure out/master everything that Windows has to offer. Compare that to Linux and Mac, where you need some computing knowledge to operate both (moreso Linux than Mac), Windows blows away the other market share.
They did. Its called Vista.
Nope. Limiting themselves to continue developing off an OS that is 9 years old is useless. Vista showed us that. The only upgrade in Vista was Directx 10. The only upgrade in Windows 7 will be Directx 11. Everything else is just how cute and user friendly the GUI can become... which those of us that actually care about system performance go through and turn off anyway.
Start fresh and start new. Force people to go out and buy new components so that memory and cpu utilization stay low. Get rid of all the flare and cuteness. Make it raw yet still GUI based.
Then let all the corporations and non-computer geeks keep using XP.
But... either way it works out... Windows 7 will just be vista with a few perks (that will probably be worse having than not) with Directx 11, as vista is XP with a few perks (all of which are worse having than not).
Beta84
They're out to get us
Tell me, what exactly do you want out of an operating system? And Directx 10 wasn't the only thing that changed with Vista. Do you use Vista or just talking from all the BS that people published the first week Vista came out?
G1G4
Find em Hot, Leave em Wet
Yep, I use Vista. Triple boot with redhat and XP. The second I got it I disabled a majority of the crap that came with it. UAC, Aero, transparencies. Reverted everything back to run basically as Windows 2000.
I'm not saying Vista is a bad OS. I am saying it doesn't really have anything that is better than XP except Directx 10. Yes, there were changes between XP and vista. But none of them made it "better" than XP. Just different.
Theres already an OS like that, it's called Linux.
Exactly, and I use that. But most game companies dont make what I want available.
As soon as software companies start making the same software across all the systems, I will uninstall all Windows based OS'es and never turn back.
Beta84
They're out to get us
Theres already an OS like that, it's called Linux.
seriously. if u want to be a nerd then get a nerdy operating system. most people aren't computer nerds with nothing better to do than learn a computer, so the "flare" and "cuteness" is preferred by a vast majority of the population.
and Gwydion, you still haven't answered my question. What do you want from an operating system? What upgrades can you think of that would improve Windows?
I did answer you. A raw OS that has the software backings of windows.
Beta84
They're out to get us
and your solution is for windows to dump everything, including the coding required for its software backings (making everything incompatible with the new OS), so they can start fresh? wouldn't that potentially end their software backings? Maybe companies would take their products elsewhere
JimW711
Driving the Z
Vista....S U C K S!
theArtistFormerlyKnownAs
Well-Known Member
I say, give me all of the gizmos and gadgets, throw everything into a sandbox, and let me edit them to my required specs. I'd like the option to boot to the new Windows OS WITH all of the fancy-smancy pretty stuff if I've got a sudden urge to bog down my system, and then also have the option to boot to the same OS with JUST the required programs and features running if I want to game, edit video, etc.
I'm getting
just talking about it. 
theArtistFormerlyKnownAs
Well-Known Member
If you can explain why, I'll give you that statement.
B
Beaver-Cleaver
Guest
is Microsoft gonna blackmail us into upgrading to this?
If so, I'm going Linux.
If so, I'm going Linux.
R