Ha! I told you so. Buried in yesterdayâs NBC News article headlined, âSyria thrust back into civil war as its allies focus on other fronts,â was this nugget about the weekendâs surprise attack by rebels in Syria, which I have called the new front in the Proxy War. First, look at this surprising question NBC just slipped into the middle of the paragraph:
There it was! Like an overnight Amazon Prime package, a new narrative, delivered right on schedule. But ⌠why should the U.S. get involved? Amongst all the various byzantine explanations for the new Syrian conflict, what suggests any possible U.S. interest?
When I first reported this story, I speculated that the U.S. had secretly started the conflict using its captive Muslim terrorist groups. I guessed it was the latest front in the Proxy War, since plans to let Ukraine launch missiles deep into Russian territory have abruptly fallen through. (Russiaâs new super-weapon makes direct U.S. involvement too risky. The U.S. is directly involved in Ukraineâs missile launches since America must provide the launch codes and satellite guidance coordinates.)
For full disclosure, the warbloggers I normally follow have not connected Syria to the Proxy War. They seem to think the dispute is related to some kind of grudge between Turkeyâs President Erdogan and Syriaâs President Assad. But to me, this kind of overly-simplistic, personality-centric conflict analysis is another red flag for deep-state narrative hijinx.
âď¸ STRATEGIC WITHDRAWAL â Wednesday, December 4, 2024 â C&C NEWS đŚ
Awful nominee out; Trump's strategic nominee now on the chessboard; Syria story starts leaking; personality journalism; Russian crackdown on Satanists raises eyebrows; Supremes consider trans; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com