Middle East War Briefing
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
glhs837
Power with Control
And it shows. They should have been so quick with the Pallywood accounts.
there is a push for Twix to add a region blocking filter to Twixt Feeds, so the world can FILTER OUT Indian slop accounts
The Ayatollah T-shirt and an Death To America Ball Cap! 
He did not get me that memo.
glhs837
Power with Control
She
The Real Reason the U.S. Att@cked Iran, And It’s Not About Israel(A Deep Dive)
The YouTube video you linked (from the channel "Mody Speaks," uploaded recently in March 2026) is titled "The Real Reason the U.S. Att@cked Iran, And It’s Not About Israel (A Deep Dive)". It's a long-form discussion/breakdown of U.S.-Iran tensions, arguing that the core issues aren't primarily driven by Israel (pushing back against common online claims that U.S. policy is controlled by or solely for Israel). Instead, the creator frames it around broader geopolitical threats from the Islamic Republic: its "fanatical" ideology, funding of proxies (like Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas), nuclear program, human rights abuses, alliances with China/Russia, and threats to global energy/security.
A big chunk of the video covers historical context, especially the 1953 events in Iran. You've heard the standard story (CIA + British MI6 overthrew an elected government), and the video addresses that but pushes back with a revisionist or contrarian take on the "second bit" (the fuller/more nuanced side).
The Standard Narrative You've Heard
In 1951–1953, Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh (or Mosaddegh) nationalized the oil industry, which had been dominated by the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (now BP). This threatened Western (especially British) economic interests during the early Cold War, when there were also fears of Soviet/communist influence via Iran's Tudeh Party.- Britain (MI6, Operation Boot) pushed hard for action.
- The U.S. (CIA, Operation Ajax/TP-AJAX, led on the ground by Kermit Roosevelt) joined in.
- In August 1953, after an initial failed attempt, a coup removed Mossadegh. The Shah (Mohammad Reza Pahlavi) was reinstated with more power, and Iran became a pro-Western monarchy until the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
- Declassified U.S. docs (especially 2013 releases) confirm the CIA's direct role in planning, funding paid protesters, bribing officials/military, false flags, and orchestrating events. The CIA has admitted it was "undemocratic" and under direct U.S. policy direction.
What the Video Claims as the "Other Side" / "Second Bit"
The creator challenges the simplified "CIA straight-up overthrew a popular elected hero" view, arguing it's exaggerated for propaganda (both Western Cold War self-congratulation and later Iranian/anti-imperialist narratives). Key points from the video's summary:- Mossadegh was appointed PM by parliament and initially backed by the Shah, but he lost broad support due to economic chaos after nationalization (British boycott crippled the economy), street protests against him, and internal political divisions.
- The Shah had constitutional power to dismiss him, which he did.
- The CIA's role (via Kermit Roosevelt) was more advisory/logistical—organizing, funding elements, and amplifying unrest—rather than a full solo orchestration. Iranian military, royalists, religious figures (some Shia clerics opposed Mossadegh), and anti-Mossadegh crowds played major roles in the final push.
- It portrays 1953 as a complex internal crisis with foreign meddling, not purely a foreign-imposed coup. The goal was anti-communist and pro-oil stability, but the video downplays direct CIA "overthrow" as mythologized.
- Ties this into why U.S. actions against the current regime (post-1979) aren't just about Israel but countering Iran's export of revolution, terrorism sponsorship, nuclear threats, etc.
Bottom Line on the History
The mainstream consensus (from declassified docs, historians like Stephen Kinzer in All the Shah's Men, and official U.S. acknowledgments) supports the CIA/MI6-led coup narrative as the primary driver—without foreign intervention, Mossadegh likely stays in power despite troubles. But there are debates on the degree of CIA control vs. Iranian internal dynamics.The video is presenting a counter-narrative to push back on "everything is Israel's fault" claims and justify ongoing U.S. opposition to Iran's government. If you've only heard the pro-Mossadegh version, this is the "other side" emphasizing complications and shifting blame to Iran's post-1979 regime.
Last edited:
why in hell are we letting these companies operate
itsbob
I bowl overhand
No Whey!